We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
The Google Pixel 3 XL is a solid device that excels in camera performance and software capabilities. The phone's camera takes excellent photos with strong dynamic range, tack-sharp details, and excellent edge detection in portrait mode. However, the HDR can sometimes feel too aggressive, resulting in overdone effects. Despite some drawbacks, the camera is one of the best features of this phone. Motion autofocus works well, allowing users to track objects around the frame. Super resume, a feature that enables digital zoom without loss of detail, still needs work and often results in watercolor-like effects at high zoom levels. The selfie camera is exceptional, with great portrait mode capabilities and sharp, natural-looking photos. Video recording is good but not as impressive as the iPhone's capabilities, particularly in 4K resolution and stabilization. The phone's design is overshadowed by its large notch, which may be a turn-off for some users. However, Google has clearly focused on software development, with features like Google Assistant, AI-powered performance enhancements, and timely security updates. While not a groundbreaking device, the Pixel 3 XL offers a reliable and feature-rich experience that's hard to beat in terms of camera performance and software capabilities. For those who value these aspects, this phone is an excellent choice. However, for others, there may be better options available.
The Realme Narzo 50A is an affordable smartphone priced from Rs. 11,999 in India. While it checks all the right boxes on paper, its worthiness of the price tag remains uncertain. Design-wise, the phone sticks to Realme's familiar principles with a simple yet practical back panel made of polycarbonate. The rear camera module extends till the center of the phone and engulfs the fingerprint reader, making it sometimes difficult to find. However, the grooved texture on the back helps with grip due to its big and heavy build at 207 grams. Performance-wise, the Realme Narzo 50A is decent for casual gaming but struggles with heavy games. The Mediatek Helio G85 Soc doesn't always allow heavy games to run smoothly, with Call of Duty Mobile just playable at default low graphics settings. Moreover, the phone warmed up quickly during gameplay. In terms of display, the phone features a 6.5-inch HD+ screen with a water drop style notch that looks outdated compared to punch-hole displays offered by competitors. However, the display looked sufficiently sharp and had decent viewing angles. Battery life is an area where the Narzo 50A excels, lasting two whole days with casual gaming and up to three days on light usage. The cameras, though impressive on paper, failed to impress in real-world scenarios. The primary camera struggled to produce detailed photos, especially when zoomed in. Selfies had good detail but looked over-sharpened, and the portrait mode was subpar. Macros weren't great either, looking over-sharpened and dramatic. In conclusion, the Realme Narzo 50A is a smartphone with reliable battery life and basic features. However, it's not ideal for gamers due to its performance limitations. Its cameras also fall short of expectations. Overall, this phone is best suited for those seeking a budget option with long battery life but can live with average cameras, design, and performance.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features