We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Metric | Google Pixel 6 | Samsung Galaxy F54 |
---|---|---|
Connectivity | #81 Winner | #205 |
Design | #50 Winner | #641 |
Display | #303 | #148 Winner |
Performance | #325 Winner | #499 |
Battery | #542 | #479 Winner |
Camera | #606 | #117 Winner |
item_phones_categoryId | #1 Tie | #1 Tie |
Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
The Google Pixel 6 offers a unique design with its custom camera bump that stretches across the back panel, creating a two-tone look. The phone's premium Gorilla Glass 6 panel and rounded matte aluminum frame provide a sturdy feel in hand, while maintaining IP68-rated dust and water resistance. The 6.4-inch flat AMOLED display features a punch hole for the selfie camera and Gorilla Glass Victus protection. Although it has a slower 90Hz refresh rate and lower 1080p resolution compared to the Pro model, the display remains decent with sharp visuals, smooth performance, and HDR10+ support. The Pixel 6 boasts the new 5nm Tensor chipset, which provides advanced machine learning capabilities, enabling features like automatic speech recognition and real-time translation. The camera processing is also improved, producing excellent photos with good sharpness, contrast, and dynamic range. However, the absence of a telephoto zoom lens and lower battery life are notable downgrades. The dual cameras include a 50MP main sensor and a 12MP ultra-wide camera, delivering great results in both bright and low-light conditions. The selfie camera produces sharp images with minimal noise and excellent dynamic range. Video recording capabilities are also impressive, with stable footage at up to 4K resolution and 60fps. Overall, the Pixel 6 offers a compelling package with its premium design, improved cameras, and advanced Tensor chipset. While it may not match the Pro model's features, it provides a competitive price point and is worth considering for those seeking a reliable Android smartphone experience.
The Samsung Galaxy F54 is a new addition to the Indian market, offering a good value for money option in the under 30K segment. The phone's design is sleek, with a plastic build and mirror-finish variant that looks striking. However, it does become a fingerprint magnet. One of the standout features of the Galaxy F54 is its display - a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED Plus screen with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR support, and punchy colors. The camera system is also impressive, with a 108MP primary sensor, OIS, an 8MP ultra-wide-angle lens, and a macro camera on the back. The front camera is 32MP, offering good detail and exposure. The phone's software is another highlight, running on OneUI 5.1 with Android 13, promising four OS updates and five years of security patches. This is one of the best update commitments in this price segment. Performance-wise, the Galaxy F54 is powered by the Exynos 1380 processor, paired with 8GB RAM and 256GB storage. The phone's benchmark scores are impressive, with good stability and no throttling issues. Day-to-day performance is smooth, with no lag while scrolling or launching apps. The battery life is also commendable, lasting a long time on heavy usage. Charging is done via a 25W fast charger, which can refill the massive 6,000mAh unit in no time. Connectivity options include 10 5G bands and carrier aggregation support. Priced at Rs. 29,999, the Galaxy F54 is a solid option for those looking for a Samsung phone under 30K. While it may not have any major negatives at this price point, it does offer some standout features that make it a good package overall.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features