We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
The Google Pixel 7a is a mid-range smartphone that offers a good camera experience for its price point. The device features a 64-megapixel main camera, which bins down to 16 megapixels by default, and a 13-megapixel ultra-wide sensor. While the camera produces good photos with plenty of dynamic range, it lacks a macro mode and has noticeable distortion on the ultra-wide shots. The phone's camera processing is improved compared to its predecessor, the Pixel 6a, but it still can't match the quality of more expensive Google Pixels like the standard 7 model. The selfie camera is solid, with plenty of range for good photos. In other areas, the Pixel 7a feels like a solid mid-range smartphone. Haptics are decent, and the optical fingerprint reader is fast enough. However, it's worth noting that the phone's price point has increased, making it more expensive than its predecessor. Compared to the standard Google Pixel 7, which shares many of the same specs but with better cameras, faster wireless charging, and other features, the 7a feels like a slightly inferior option for its $500-$550 price tag. However, if you can find the 7 model on sale for around $450, it's worth considering that option instead. Overall, the Pixel 7a is a good phone for those who want a decent camera experience and don't need the latest and greatest features. However, for its price point, there are other options available that may offer better value.
The Vivo Y300 Pro stands out with its massive 6,500mAh battery, making it an attractive option for those seeking long-lasting power without added bulk. Despite its large capacity, the phone's thickness and weight are comparable to regular flagship devices, thanks to Vivo's innovative battery packaging and reduced motherboard size. In our testing, the phone performed exceptionally well, lasting 5 hours in a heavy endurance test with minimal battery drop. Video watching consumed just 4% of the battery, allowing for up to 20 hours of continuous playback. Gaming performance was also impressive, with Honor of Kings playable at 90 FPS for up to 11 hours. The Vivo Y300 Pro supports fast charging, reaching 100% in just 48 minutes. Its battery can be charged up to 1,700 times and still retain over 80% capacity. The phone's design is sleek, with a 6.7-inch OLED display featuring rounded corners and a slight curve for comfortable handling. The Y300 Pro also boasts an IR remote control and IP65 waterproof rating, making it practical for everyday use. With up to 12GB of RAM and 512GB storage, the phone performs well in daily tasks and can handle demanding games like Honor of Kings at 90 FPS. However, camera quality is below average, with no optical image stabilization. The Vivo Y300 Pro starts at CNY 799 (around $253 USD) for its base variant with 8GB RAM and 128GB storage. This phone is ideal for those prioritizing battery life, multimedia use, and casual gaming. While it may have some drawbacks, the Y300 Pro's impressive battery performance makes it a compelling option for those seeking a long-lasting device without added bulk.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features