We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific cons listed for this device
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a significant upgrade over its predecessor, with notable improvements in design, display, and performance. The phone's folding mechanism has been refined, making it more seamless to use. However, the price tag remains a major concern, with many feeling that it's still not worth the premium. One of the standout features of the Pixel 9 Pro Fold is its large internal screen, which provides an excellent viewing experience. The external display, while smaller, is still capable and convenient for checking notifications or taking quick selfies. Camera performance has also been improved, although some may find the "Pro" moniker to be misleading. The fingerprint scanner can be finicky, particularly in dry environments, and always-on setup needs to be enabled manually. These issues aside, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold's AI capabilities are robust, making it a great choice for those invested in Google's ecosystem. In comparison to other foldable phones on the market, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold holds its own, with a bigger internal screen and more seamless experience. However, some may prefer the design of older models like the Oppo Find N, which offered a unique "passport-style" aesthetic. Ultimately, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a solid choice for those interested in foldable phones, particularly if you're already invested in Google's ecosystem. The addition of 7 years of OS updates and security patches provides peace of mind. While it may not be perfect, this phone has made significant strides forward, making it a viable option for those willing to consider its price.
The Vivo V40E is a mid-range smartphone that boasts an impressive 5500 mAh battery capacity and 80W super fast charging capabilities. In this test review, we put the phone's charging speed to the test. With a fully dead battery (1% charge), we connected the phone to its 80W charger and let it run for 15 minutes, after which it reached 46%. The charging speed was remarkably fast, considering the phone's size and capacity. At 25 minutes, the battery had reached 67%, and by 35 minutes, it had climbed to 87%. The phone continued to charge quickly, hitting 96% by the 40-minute mark. After a further three minutes, the battery finally hit 100%. The entire charging process took just 43 minutes, a testament to the power of Vivo's 80W super fast charging technology. In our test conditions (21°C room temperature), the phone's charging speed was impressive, and we would expect similar results in everyday use. While the battery size is substantial, the phone's overall design is still sleek, with a glass back and plastic frame, featuring dual cameras and a 50MP primary sensor. While this review focused solely on the battery charging test, it's clear that the Vivo V40E has plenty to offer, including its speedy charging capabilities. If you're in the market for a mid-range smartphone with impressive specs, the Vivo V40E is definitely worth considering.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features