We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Metric | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Samsung Galaxy F62 |
---|---|---|
Connectivity | #71 Winner | #784 |
Design | #45 Winner | #796 |
Display | #507 Winner | #593 |
Performance | #200 Winner | #419 |
Battery | #1 Winner | #591 |
Camera | #33 Winner | #222 |
item_phones_categoryId | #1 Tie | #1 Tie |
Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a classy flagship device that boasts a clean and great-looking design. Its display is the brightest around, making it perfect for still photos. The camera system, although not revolutionary, delivers excellent results during the day with crisp detail and well-balanced color rendition. The rear main camera captures high-contrast images with hints of pixelation in certain situations, but textures don't look overprocessed. The telephoto cam provides solid five-time zoom photos with good dynamic range and colors, but some competitors are sharper. The ultra-wide camera delivers bright exposures at night, although the detail level leaves more to be desired. The selfie camera has seen a significant upgrade this year, capturing nicely detailed selfies with vivid colors, lifelike skin tones, and excellent dynamic range. Video recording is where the Pixel 9 Pro XL falls short, particularly in low light conditions where the main cam's 4K videos are softer than the competition. Battery life has improved slightly from last year's model, but it still lags behind some competitors. Charging speed has been increased to 37 watts, and wireless charging and reverse wireless charging are supported. The device runs smoothly with hiccup-free performance in our testing. Overall, the Pixel 9 Pro XL is a solid flagship device that excels in still photography and AI features. Its display and design are top-notch, and software support will be available for an extended period. However, it may not be the best choice for those seeking the most powerful chipset or video recording capabilities. If you're looking for alternatives, consider last year's Pixel 8 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a powerful smartphone that boasts impressive performance, battery life, and features within the Rs. 25-30,000 price range. The device packs a large 7000mAh battery that can last for two days under moderate use, making it ideal for those who need a phone with extended battery life. The phone's camera is another highlight, featuring a 64MP primary sensor, and supports features like portrait mode, super slow-motion video recording, and pro mode. However, the lack of stereo sound and 60fps video recording are notable drawbacks. The Galaxy F62 runs on One UI Core 3.1, which is a slightly toned-down version of Samsung's latest skin. This means that some features and services available on the flagship series might not be accessible on this device. Despite these limitations, the phone offers a lot of value for its price. It comes with features like Samsung Pay, Secure Folder, and Linked to Windows, making it a great choice for those who want a reliable smartphone with good security features. In terms of build quality, the F62 has a solid design, but lacks protective casing and screen protector out-of-the-box. The phone also doesn't come with earbuds in the box, which might be a disappointment for some users. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy F62 is a great option for those who want a powerful smartphone with excellent battery life within the Rs. 25-30,000 price range. While it may not offer all the bells and whistles of the flagship series, it makes up for it in terms of performance, features, and value for money.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features