We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Metric | Google Pixel Fold | vivo Y300 Pro |
---|---|---|
Connectivity | #77 Winner | #219 |
Design | #327 Winner | #459 |
Display | #407 | #165 Winner |
Performance | #310 Winner | #406 |
Battery | #195 | #102 Winner |
Camera | #373 Winner | #641 |
item_phones_categoryId | #1 Tie | #1 Tie |
Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
The Google Pixel Fold is an intriguing device, with its unique form factor and impressive first-gen features. The phone's design feels familiar yet distinct from the standard Pixel series, with a passport-sized size and conscious decisions to make it thin. However, some compromises are evident, such as weak battery life, imperfect app optimization, and a slightly higher price point of $1,800. The camera, while not on par with the Pixel Flagships, is still decent for a first-gen device. The phone's ability to switch seamlessly between closed and open modes is a major highlight, offering an unparalleled user experience when unfolded. Android 14 support, great haptics, and excellent speakers are also notable features. The battery life is disappointing, with wireless charging available but no fast charging option beyond 30W. App optimization remains an issue, with popular apps like Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube Studio not fully utilizing the phone's larger screen. Despite these drawbacks, I found myself enjoying using the Pixel Fold, especially when closed, which feels more like a normal phone experience. The device excels in its ability to transition between modes, offering an intriguing new world of functionality. With five years of security updates promised, this could be a reliable choice for enthusiasts and early adopters. Ultimately, the Pixel Fold is not without its quirks, but it shows promise as a first-gen product. If you're willing to overlook some imperfections, the phone's strengths might make it an appealing option. However, at $1,800, it's exclusive to a niche market of enthusiasts and fans, making it challenging for casual upgraders to justify the expense.
The Vivo Y300 Pro stands out with its massive 6,500mAh battery, making it an attractive option for those seeking long-lasting power without added bulk. Despite its large capacity, the phone's thickness and weight are comparable to regular flagship devices, thanks to Vivo's innovative battery packaging and reduced motherboard size. In our testing, the phone performed exceptionally well, lasting 5 hours in a heavy endurance test with minimal battery drop. Video watching consumed just 4% of the battery, allowing for up to 20 hours of continuous playback. Gaming performance was also impressive, with Honor of Kings playable at 90 FPS for up to 11 hours. The Vivo Y300 Pro supports fast charging, reaching 100% in just 48 minutes. Its battery can be charged up to 1,700 times and still retain over 80% capacity. The phone's design is sleek, with a 6.7-inch OLED display featuring rounded corners and a slight curve for comfortable handling. The Y300 Pro also boasts an IR remote control and IP65 waterproof rating, making it practical for everyday use. With up to 12GB of RAM and 512GB storage, the phone performs well in daily tasks and can handle demanding games like Honor of Kings at 90 FPS. However, camera quality is below average, with no optical image stabilization. The Vivo Y300 Pro starts at CNY 799 (around $253 USD) for its base variant with 8GB RAM and 128GB storage. This phone is ideal for those prioritizing battery life, multimedia use, and casual gaming. While it may have some drawbacks, the Y300 Pro's impressive battery performance makes it a compelling option for those seeking a long-lasting device without added bulk.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features