Google Pixel Foldvsvivo Y300 Pro

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Google
Google Pixel Fold
Pixel Fold
Processor:Google Tensor G2
RAM:12GB
Storage:256GB

Quick Stats

The Google Pixel Fold's weak battery life is a significant drawback despite its impressive design and features.
The Pixel Fold's display offers vibrant colors and excellent contrast, but with noticeable compromises and limitations.
The Pixel Fold's camera is a solid but not spectacular effort, lacking vibrancy and detail in photos.
The Pixel Fold's performance is a major strength, offering seamless execution and snappy transitions with ease always.
vivo
vivo Y300 Pro
Y300 Pro
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen1
RAM:8GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Vivo Y300 Pro boasts an exceptional battery life that outperforms competitors with its massive 6,500mAh capacity and fast charging feature.
The Vivo Y300 Pro's display is exceptionally smooth, vibrant, and feature-rich with impressive brightness and color accuracy.
The Vivo Y300 Pro's camera struggles to deliver impressive results, particularly in low-light conditions and depth-of-field.
The Vivo Y300 Pro boasts impressive performance, handling demanding tasks with ease and efficiency.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
Google Pixel Fold
2.85 GHz
vivo Y300 Pro
2.20 GHz

RAM

Winner
Google Pixel Fold
12GB
vivo Y300 Pro
8GB

Storage

Winner
Google Pixel Fold
256GB
vivo Y300 Pro
128GB

Weight

Winner
Google Pixel Fold
283g
vivo Y300 Pro
194g
Rank
Google Pixel Fold
Winner
#323
vivo Y300 Pro
#385
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
Google Pixel Fold
#77
Winner
vivo Y300 Pro
#219
Design
Google Pixel Fold
#327
Winner
vivo Y300 Pro
#459
Display
Google Pixel Fold
#407
vivo Y300 Pro
#165
Winner
Performance
Google Pixel Fold
#310
Winner
vivo Y300 Pro
#406
Battery
Google Pixel Fold
#195
vivo Y300 Pro
#102
Winner
Camera
Google Pixel Fold
#373
Winner
vivo Y300 Pro
#641
item_phones_categoryId
Google Pixel Fold
#1
Tie
vivo Y300 Pro
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
Google Google Pixel Fold
vivo vivo Y300 Pro
Model
Google Tensor G2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen1
CPU
2x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex, X1 +2x2.35 GHz ARM Cortex, A76 + 4x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex, A55
4x2.2GHz Cortex A78 + 4x1.80GHz Cortex A55
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
5
4
Frequency
2.85
2.20
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
ARM Mali-G710 MP7
Adreno 710
RAM
12
8
Type
RAM LPDDR5
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
256
128
Type
UFS Storage 3.1
UFS Storage 2.2
SD slot
No
No
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, in screen
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Barometer sensor
Yes
N/A
Gravity sensor
N/A
Yes
Hall sensor
Yes
N/A
Magnetometer sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
Stereo Speakers
N/A
Antutu Score
793800
575000
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 83% of devices
Overall performance better than 77% of devices
Cooling system
Yes
Yes
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Google Pixel Fold

Strengths

Feels well-optimized for using it closed
Great haptics and speakers
5 years of promise security updates
New design from Channel sponsor dbrand looks sick
Android 14 coming up soon
Great form factor with thin design and innovative hinge

Weaknesses

Camera quality is a step down from Pixel Flagship cameras
Some apps are not optimized for larger screen size
Weak battery life with only wireless charging available
$1,800 price point makes it inaccessible to casual buyers
Notable crease on inside display and bezels
App situation issues with some apps looking terrible

vivo Y300 Pro

Strengths

Long-lasting battery life
Fast charging capabilities
Powerful processor
Good display quality
IP65 waterproof rating
Good camera performance
Affordable price

Weaknesses

Large size
Below-average camera quality
Limited color options
Read Full Reviews

Google Pixel Fold

The Google Pixel Fold is an intriguing device, with its unique form factor and impressive first-gen features. The phone's design feels familiar yet distinct from the standard Pixel series, with a passport-sized size and conscious decisions to make it thin. However, some compromises are evident, such as weak battery life, imperfect app optimization, and a slightly higher price point of $1,800. The camera, while not on par with the Pixel Flagships, is still decent for a first-gen device. The phone's ability to switch seamlessly between closed and open modes is a major highlight, offering an unparalleled user experience when unfolded. Android 14 support, great haptics, and excellent speakers are also notable features. The battery life is disappointing, with wireless charging available but no fast charging option beyond 30W. App optimization remains an issue, with popular apps like Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube Studio not fully utilizing the phone's larger screen. Despite these drawbacks, I found myself enjoying using the Pixel Fold, especially when closed, which feels more like a normal phone experience. The device excels in its ability to transition between modes, offering an intriguing new world of functionality. With five years of security updates promised, this could be a reliable choice for enthusiasts and early adopters. Ultimately, the Pixel Fold is not without its quirks, but it shows promise as a first-gen product. If you're willing to overlook some imperfections, the phone's strengths might make it an appealing option. However, at $1,800, it's exclusive to a niche market of enthusiasts and fans, making it challenging for casual upgraders to justify the expense.

vivo Y300 Pro

The Vivo Y300 Pro stands out with its massive 6,500mAh battery, making it an attractive option for those seeking long-lasting power without added bulk. Despite its large capacity, the phone's thickness and weight are comparable to regular flagship devices, thanks to Vivo's innovative battery packaging and reduced motherboard size. In our testing, the phone performed exceptionally well, lasting 5 hours in a heavy endurance test with minimal battery drop. Video watching consumed just 4% of the battery, allowing for up to 20 hours of continuous playback. Gaming performance was also impressive, with Honor of Kings playable at 90 FPS for up to 11 hours. The Vivo Y300 Pro supports fast charging, reaching 100% in just 48 minutes. Its battery can be charged up to 1,700 times and still retain over 80% capacity. The phone's design is sleek, with a 6.7-inch OLED display featuring rounded corners and a slight curve for comfortable handling. The Y300 Pro also boasts an IR remote control and IP65 waterproof rating, making it practical for everyday use. With up to 12GB of RAM and 512GB storage, the phone performs well in daily tasks and can handle demanding games like Honor of Kings at 90 FPS. However, camera quality is below average, with no optical image stabilization. The Vivo Y300 Pro starts at CNY 799 (around $253 USD) for its base variant with 8GB RAM and 128GB storage. This phone is ideal for those prioritizing battery life, multimedia use, and casual gaming. While it may have some drawbacks, the Y300 Pro's impressive battery performance makes it a compelling option for those seeking a long-lasting device without added bulk.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features