Honor X30vsUlefone Power Armor 13

Honor X30
#549
Winner
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (SM6375)
RAM:6 GBGB
Storage:128 GBGB

Quick Stats

The Honor X30 offers all-day battery life with 66W fast charging, ensuring quick replenishment and sustained performance.
The Honor X30's 120Hz display with 240Hz touch sampling delivers vibrant, smooth visuals for an immersive experience.
Honor X30’s camera offers versatile mid-range performance with 4K video and HDR, but lacks an ultra-wide lens for broader shots.
The Honor X30's Snapdragon 695 delivers smooth mid-range performance for daily tasks and light gaming.
Ulefone Power Armor 13
#634
Processor:MediaTek Helio G95
RAM:8 GBGB
Storage:256 GBGB

Quick Stats

The Ulefone Power Armor 13's battery life is its crowning jewel, offering unprecedented endurance and reliability.
The Power Armor 13's display is a standout feature, delivering vibrant colors and impressive brightness.
The Ulefone Power Armor 13's cameras are disappointing and fail to impress, even in good lighting conditions generally.
The Ulefone Power Armor 13 delivers exceptional performance, making it an excellent choice for demanding users every time.
Specifications Comparison
Specification
Honor Honor X30
Ulefone Ulefone Power Armor 13
Model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (SM6375)
MediaTek Helio G95
CPU
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold +6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
2x Cortex, A76 2.05 GHz + 6x Cortex, A55 1.95 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
6 nm
12 nm
Frequency
2,2 GHz
2,0 GHz
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Arm Mali-G76 3EEMC4720 MHz
RAM
6 GB
8 GB
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
128 GB
256 GB
Type
N/A
UFS Storage 2.1
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Barometer sensor
N/A
Yes
Gravity sensor
Yes
N/A
Geomagnetic sensor
N/A
Yes
Audio
N/A
N/A
Antutu Score
395000
409878
Antutu Version
Antutu v9
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 66% of devices
Overall performance better than 68% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Rankings
Connectivity
Honor X30
#567
Winner
Ulefone Power Armor 13
#701
Design
Honor X30
#218
Winner
Ulefone Power Armor 13
#375
Display
Honor X30
#446
Winner
Ulefone Power Armor 13
#734
Performance
Honor X30
#618
Ulefone Power Armor 13
#514
Winner
Battery
Honor X30
#425
Winner
Ulefone Power Armor 13
#597
Camera
Honor X30
#571
Ulefone Power Armor 13
#452
Winner

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Key Differences

No significant specification differences found between these devices.

Scores by Category
Pros and Cons

Honor X30

Strengths

Premium build quality with a sleek aluminum alloy frame and modern design.
Fast 66W charging and 4800mAh battery for all-day endurance.
120Hz refresh rate display with vibrant visuals and smooth performance.
Competitive mid-range pricing with feature-rich specifications.

Weaknesses

Lacks an ultra-wide camera for enhanced photography versatility.
No Google Mobile Services (GMS) pre-installed in certain regions.
IPS LCD display instead of a more advanced AMOLED panel.
Absence of water resistance certification (IP rating).

Ulefone Power Armor 13

Strengths

Powerful performance
Fast and snappy UI
Long battery life
Unique features
Good camera performance in good lighting
Wide compatibility

Weaknesses

Large and heavy design
Average camera performance in low light
Stabilization issues during video recording
Some fingerprint scanner quirks
Not a 5G device
Read Full Reviews

Honor X30

The Honor X30 blends sleek, premium design with smooth performance and a vibrant display, offering a versatile camera and long-lasting battery for an affordable, feature-packed smartphone experience.

Ulefone Power Armor 13

The Ulefone Power Armor 13 is a behemoth of a phone, weighing in at an astonishing 492 grams, making it the largest and heaviest device I've ever had the pleasure of trying. While its size may be intimidating, this rugged phone packs a punch with its impressive feature set. Under the hood, you'll find the Mediatek Helio G95 processor paired with 8GB of RAM, delivering snappy performance that's more than capable of handling demanding tasks and games. The phone runs Android 11 out of the box, with a light launcher that feels remarkably close to stock Android. I was impressed by how fast it opens apps, switches between them, and even handles graphics-intensive games like Call of Duty. The display is another highlight, offering a larger screen than most rugged phones, making it perfect for those who need a device that can keep up with their active lifestyle. The battery life is equally impressive, providing days of use without needing to be plugged in. While the cameras are decent, they're not exactly setting any standards. In good light conditions, images are passable, but as soon as you venture into low-light situations, things start to degrade quickly. Video recording maxes out at 4K at 30fps, but lacks stabilization, resulting in shaky footage. The Ulefone Power Armor 13 is a solid choice for those seeking a rugged phone that can keep up with their active lifestyle. Its impressive battery life, larger screen, and robust feature set make it stand out from the competition. However, its massive size and weight may be a turn-off for some users, making it more suited to those who prioritize functionality over form. Overall, I'd say the Ulefone Power Armor 13 is a step up from other rugged phones on the market, but its size and weight may limit its appeal to some. If you're in the market for a reliable and feature-packed phone that can withstand the rigors of daily use, this device is definitely worth considering.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features