We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Metric | Honor X7a | Google Pixel 3a |
---|---|---|
Connectivity | #755 | #658 Winner |
Design | #540 | #160 Winner |
Display | #754 | #712 Winner |
Performance | #779 | #763 Winner |
Battery | #690 Winner | #827 |
Camera | #399 Winner | #833 |
item_phones_categoryId | #1 Tie | #1 Tie |
Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
Choosing a budget-friendly smartphone can be a challenge, especially when every peso counts. The new Honor X7a is an entry-level phone that retails for 7990 pesos, making it an attractive option for those with limited budgets. Design-wise, the Honor X7a's design is similar to its predecessor, the Honor X7, but with some minor tweaks. The rear camera bezel has been redesigned with a new rectangular housing and separate camera lenses. While the phone feels nice to hold, the back side can be a fingerprint magnet, making a case necessary. The 6.74-inch IPS screen is large and produces great colors with good contrast, although it can be too saturated at times. However, there are some issues with lag, especially when scrolling or tapping the screen quickly. This could be related to the phone's hardware. The quad-camera setup on the back takes decent photos in well-lit conditions, but struggles in low light or night mode. The front camera is also underwhelming, producing filtered photos that require touch-ups. Video recording is limited to 1080p at 30fps without optical stabilization. Performance-wise, the Honor X7a's specs are not impressive, but it can still run basic tasks and games like Asphalt 9 with graphic settings set to low. However, it struggles with more demanding games. On the bright side, the phone has a massive 6000mAh battery that can last up to three days. In conclusion, the Honor X7a is an okay phone for its price point of under 8000 pesos in this day and age. While it may not be the most powerful device, it has everything you might need from a smartphone, including dual SIM support, a big battery, and a decent camera. If budget is a concern, the Honor X7a is worth considering at its affordable price of 7990 pesos.
The Google Pixel 3a is a solid mid-range smartphone that boasts an impressive camera system, excellent battery life, and a clean software experience. While it doesn't have the super high-end specs and features found in its flagship counterparts, it makes up for these limitations by offering a more affordable price point of $400. One of the standout features of the Pixel 3a is its camera performance, which is on par with the more expensive Pixel models. The single rear camera produces detailed and colorful photos, even in challenging lighting conditions. Additionally, the phone's battery life is impressive, consistently delivering over five hours of screen time and easily lasting a full day. The phone's performance is decent but not exceptional, with some noticeable lag when opening multiple apps or editing large files. However, this didn't detract from my overall experience, as I found it to be more than sufficient for general use. Other notable features include a fingerprint reader on the back, a squeeze gesture for assistance, and a haptic motor that provides a great typing and notification experience. The phone's software is also up-to-date with regular security patches and feature updates. While there are other mid-range phones available in this price range, such as the Zenfone 6 and OnePlus 7, the Pixel 3a stands out for its exceptional camera quality and clean software experience. If you're looking for a reliable phone that takes great photos and offers a seamless user experience, the Pixel 3a is definitely worth considering.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features