HTC U24 provsSamsung Galaxy M62

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

HTC
HTC U24 pro
U24 pro
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (SM7550-AB)
RAM:12GB
Storage:256GB

Quick Stats

The HTC U24 Pro's battery life is decent but not outstanding, suited for casual users primarily.
The HTC U24 Pro's display offers smooth performance and crisp visuals, but design choices may be polarizing.
The HTC U24 Pro's triple-camera setup is satisfactory but lacks optical stabilization and versatility compared to others.
The HTC U24 Pro's subpar performance is its most significant drawback, despite decent specs and battery life.
Samsung
Samsung Galaxy M62
Galaxy M62
Processor:Samsung Exynos 9 9825
RAM:8GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Samsung Galaxy M62's massive 7000mAh battery delivers impressive all-day power with minimal need for recharging.
The Samsung Galaxy M62's impressive AMOLED Plus HD display is its standout feature and greatest value.
The Galaxy M62's camera setup offers reliable results with good color accuracy and decent low-light performance, mostly.
The Samsung Galaxy M62's top-notch performance is its standout feature, delivering seamless multitasking and efficient power usage.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
HTC U24 pro
2.63 GHz
Samsung Galaxy M62
2.73 GHz

RAM

Winner
HTC U24 pro
12GB
Samsung Galaxy M62
8GB

Storage

Winner
HTC U24 pro
256GB
Samsung Galaxy M62
128GB

Weight

Winner
HTC U24 pro
198g
Samsung Galaxy M62
218g
Rank
HTC U24 pro
Winner
#274
Samsung Galaxy M62
#559
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
HTC U24 pro
#1
Winner
Samsung Galaxy M62
#600
Design
HTC U24 pro
#549
Winner
Samsung Galaxy M62
#795
Display
HTC U24 pro
#311
Winner
Samsung Galaxy M62
#592
Performance
HTC U24 pro
#262
Winner
Samsung Galaxy M62
#418
Battery
HTC U24 pro
#212
Winner
Samsung Galaxy M62
#590
Camera
HTC U24 pro
#189
Samsung Galaxy M62
#186
Winner
item_phones_categoryId
HTC U24 pro
#1
Tie
Samsung Galaxy M62
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
HTC HTC U24 pro
Samsung Samsung Galaxy M62
Model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (SM7550-AB)
Samsung Exynos 9 9825
CPU
1x2.63 GHz Cortex, A715 +3x2.4 GHz Cortex, A715 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex, A510
2x Exynos M4 2.73 GHz + 2x Cortex, A75 2.4 GHz + Cortex, A55 1.95 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
4
7
Frequency
2.63
2.73
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Qualcomm Adreno 720
ARM MaliG76 MP12
RAM
12
8
Type
RAM LPDDR5
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
256
128
Type
UFS Storage 3.1
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, in screen
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
N/A
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Gravity sensor
Yes
N/A
Geomagnetic sensor
N/A
Yes
Audio
N/A
N/A
Antutu Score
865000
660800
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 85% of devices
Overall performance better than 79% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

HTC U24 pro

Strengths

The device has a high-quality display with 6.8 inches, 1080x2436 pixels, OLED display running at 120Hz refresh rate
It supports wireless charging up to 15 watts and also has USB-C fast charging at 60 watts
The phone comes with 12GB of RAM and 256/512GB of storage, both being UFS 3.1 storage type
Expendable storage using a Micro SD card is available, making it a relatively okay internal specification
The device can record videos at 4K up to 30 frames and 1080p up to 60 frames with the front camera having a 50-megapixel sensor
It has a large 4600mAh battery which is good for long usage

Weaknesses

The build of this device is weirdly shaped with slanted edges, making it feel sharp in hand
The phone has a blocky feel due to its side edges being made in the same way, making it uncomfortable to hold
The plastic back feels cheap and doesn't look great, giving a low-quality feel
The top bezel of the device is quite substantial despite having an 88% screen-to-body ratio
The camera setup at the back has a confusing design with two cameras being 50 megapixel sensors, one wide and one telephoto, but still lacking features like zoom or macro mode
The price tag of €760 is too high for what it offers, especially when compared to other alternatives in the market

Samsung Galaxy M62

Strengths

The Samsung Galaxy M62 offers a lot of value for its price of just RM1,999
It packs a large 7,000mAh battery that supports up to 25 watts of fast charging and power sharing
The phone has an Exynos 9825 chipset, which is the same as the one found in the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 series
It features an AMOLED display with a resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels
The camera setup includes a 64MP main camera, a 12MP ultra-wide lens, and two 5MP lenses for macro and depth sensing
The phone runs on One UI 3.1 based on Android 11, which is clean, minimal, and easy to use
It has a side-mounted fingerprint sensor and comes in a glossy finish at the back panel with a holographic design
The phone feels premium due to its gorgeous AMOLED display and flagship chipset

Weaknesses

The phone's size can be a bit of a concern, as it's quite chunky due to the large battery
Some might find the Exynos 9825 chipset to be a little old compared to newer flagships
There's no mention of any exciting features or innovations that would set this phone apart from others in its class
Read Full Reviews

HTC U24 pro

The HTC U24 Pro boasts an impressive 6.8-inch OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, a triple-camera setup, and a large 4,600mAh battery. The device's design is unique, featuring slanted edges and a curved screen that extends further than traditional bezels. However, the plastic back and sharp-edged design may not be to everyone's taste. With a price tag of €760, the U24 Pro faces stiff competition from other devices with similar specs but at significantly lower prices. Can it justify its premium price?

Samsung Galaxy M62

The Samsung Galaxy M62 is a surprisingly impressive device that offers a range of exciting features at an affordable price point of RM1,999. One of the standout aspects of this phone is its massive 7,000mAh battery, which provides all-day battery life and supports up to 25 watts of fast charging. The phone's display is another highlight, featuring a large 6.7-inch AMOLED Plus HD screen that offers vibrant colors and excellent maximum brightness. The glossy finish on the back panel adds a premium touch, with a holographic design that features a gradient effect that transitions from blue to a mirror-like silver finish at the bottom. Under the hood, the Galaxy M62 is powered by an Exynos 9825 chipset, which is the same processor used in the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 series. This provides robust performance and ensures smooth multitasking. The phone also comes with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage as standard. The camera setup on the Galaxy M62 is a solid effort, featuring a 64MP main camera, a 12MP ultra-wide lens, and two additional lenses for macro and depth sensing. While it may not offer cutting-edge camera capabilities, Samsung's software expertise shines through with decent photography and videography performance. The phone runs on One UI 3.1 based on Android 11, which is clean, minimal, and easy to use. The side-mounted fingerprint sensor adds a touch of convenience, while the phone's overall design makes it feel premium without breaking the bank. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy M62 is an excellent value for money, offering a unique blend of features, performance, and affordability. Its large battery, vibrant display, and robust Exynos chipset make it an attractive option for those looking for a premium experience without the hefty price tag.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Read HTC U24 pro ReviewRead Samsung Galaxy M62 Review

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features