Motorola Edge 30 NeovsHonor X7c

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Motorola
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Edge 30 Neo
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (SM6375)
RAM:8GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Moto Edge 30 Neo's impressive battery life is its standout feature and a major selling point.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo's stunning display boasts exceptional brightness, smooth refresh rate, and vivid colors with good contrast.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo's camera performance is decent, delivering good results in various lighting conditions overall.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo's performance falls short compared to its competitors due to a mid-range Snapdragon 695 chipset.
Honor
Honor X7c
X7c
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (SM6225)
RAM:8GB
Storage:256GB

Quick Stats

The Honor X7c's impressive battery life is its standout feature, providing long-lasting power and efficient recharging.
The Honor X7c's HD+ display is sufficient for basic tasks, but lacks outdoor visibility and high resolution.
The Honor X7c's cameras offer decent performance for everyday use at a surprisingly affordable price point overall.
The Honor X7c's performance is decent for everyday use but unremarkable and lacking in more demanding scenarios.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
2.20 GHz
Honor X7c
2.80 GHz

RAM

Tie
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
8GB
Honor X7c
8GB

Storage

Winner
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
128GB
Honor X7c
256GB

Weight

Winner
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
155g
Honor X7c
196g
Specifications Comparison
Specification
Motorola Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Honor Honor X7c
Model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (SM6375)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (SM6225)
CPU
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold +6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
4x2.8 GHz Cortex, A73 + 4x1.9GHz Cortex, A53
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
6
6
Frequency
2.20
2.80
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Adreno 610
RAM
8
8
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
128
256
SD slot
No
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, in screen
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Gravity sensor
N/A
Yes
Audio
Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones
Stereo Speakers
Antutu Score
425200
321000
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 72% of devices
Overall performance better than 64% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Motorola Edge 30 Neo

Strengths

The phone has a snazzy compact design, super fast charging, and a bright 120hz OLED display
The phone is very lightweight (just 155 grams) and easy to wield
The LED ring around the camera Island acts as a notification light and charging indicator
The phone has ingress protection against dust and light splashes on the front
The battery life is pretty good, with an endurance rating of 104 hours in our proprietary tests

Weaknesses

The chipset is far from Flagship grade (Snapdragon 695 5G) and underwhelming compared to competitors
HDR support is missing on the display
The camera performance is affected by the chipset, with slow night mode processing speed
There's no 4K video recording capability, only 1080p
The ultra wide camera struggles to deliver usable photos at night

Honor X7c

Strengths

The Honor X7c has a durable design with a matte finish on its back panel that looks and feels like leather.
It has good grip and is comfortable to hold, weighing only 194g and having a thickness of 8.09mm.
The device comes with an IP64 rating, making it resistant to dust and water splashes on multiple angles.
The Honor X7c can handle some drop tests due to its five-star drop resistance from SGS.
It has a decent camera setup with a 108MP main shooter that delivers good details and sharpness.
The device is powered by a Snapdragon 685 chip paired with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, making it suitable for multitasking and gaming.

Weaknesses

The Honor X7c comes with an entry-level spec sheet, which may not be impressive for some users.
It only has an HD+ display with a resolution of 1610 x 720 and a 120Hz refresh rate, which is not ideal for outdoor use.
The camera can have oversaturated results and deep shadows in certain conditions.
The selfie camera can capture soft details in low-light environments.
Video recording is limited to 1080p at 30fps without stabilization features on both sensors.
The device's charging speed is slower than usual, taking around 1 hour and 30 minutes to charge from 0 to 100%
Read Full Reviews

Motorola Edge 30 Neo

The Moto Edge 30 Neo is the most affordable and compact offering in Motorola's new series. This mid-ranger boasts a snazzy design, super-fast charging, and a bright 120Hz OLED display. Weighing just 155 grams, it's incredibly lightweight and easy to wield. A unique purple hue and frosted coating on the back panel add visual interest. The phone also features an LED ring notification light, ingress protection against dust and water, and a fingerprint reader under the display. But does its compact size come at the cost of performance?

Honor X7c

The Honor X7c is a budget smartphone that stands out in the market with its impressive design and durable build quality. Its Forest Green back panel has a matte finish that resembles leather, making it comfortable to hold and providing good grip. One of its key selling features is its IP64 rating, ensuring resistance to dust and water splashes on multiple angles. With an affordable price tag of 8,999 pesos, this device offers decent performance, cameras, and battery life, making it a solid entry-level option for those seeking value without sacrificing style.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Read Motorola Edge 30 Neo ReviewRead Honor X7c Review

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features