Motorola Moto E14vsSamsung Galaxy F12

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Motorola
Motorola Moto E14
Moto E14
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T606
RAM:2GB
Storage:64GB

Quick Stats

The Motorola Moto E14 offers a decent battery life with up to 12 hours of screen time per charge.
The Motorola Moto E14's display offers a smooth scrolling experience with a 90Hz refresh rate at an affordable price point.
The Motorola Moto E14's camera is surprisingly good, delivering decent photos and smooth video recording at an affordable price.
The Motorola Moto E14 falls significantly short of expectations due to sluggish and unresponsive performance.
Samsung
Samsung Galaxy F12
Galaxy F12
Processor:Samsung Exynos 850
RAM:4GB
Storage:64GB

Quick Stats

The Galaxy F12's battery life is decent, but falls short of expectations due to sluggish charging times.
The Samsung Galaxy F12's display boasts a 90Hz refresh rate, making for a smooth viewing experience overall.
The Samsung Galaxy F12's camera setup delivers decent results, but lacks video stabilization and has limited resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy F12 delivers impressive performance, handling everyday tasks with ease and minimal lag overall.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
Motorola Moto E14
1.60 GHz
Samsung Galaxy F12
2 GHz

RAM

Winner
Motorola Moto E14
2GB
Samsung Galaxy F12
4GB

Storage

Tie
Motorola Moto E14
64GB
Samsung Galaxy F12
64GB

Weight

Winner
Motorola Moto E14
179g
Samsung Galaxy F12
221g
Rank
Motorola Moto E14
#796
Samsung Galaxy F12
Winner
#721
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
Motorola Moto E14
#760
Winner
Samsung Galaxy F12
#782
Design
Motorola Moto E14
#231
Winner
Samsung Galaxy F12
#793
Display
Motorola Moto E14
#647
Winner
Samsung Galaxy F12
#679
Performance
Motorola Moto E14
#765
Winner
Samsung Galaxy F12
#792
Battery
Motorola Moto E14
#743
Samsung Galaxy F12
#717
Winner
Camera
Motorola Moto E14
#852
Samsung Galaxy F12
#387
Winner
item_phones_categoryId
Motorola Moto E14
#1
Tie
Samsung Galaxy F12
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
Motorola Motorola Moto E14
Samsung Samsung Galaxy F12
Model
Unisoc Tiger T606
Samsung Exynos 850
CPU
2x1.6 GHz Cortex, A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex, A55
4x Cortex, A55 2.0 GHz + 4x Cortex, A55 2.0 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12
8
Frequency
1.60
2
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
ARM Mali-G57
ARM Mali-G52
RAM
2
4
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
64
64
Type
UFS Storage 2.2
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
Dolby Atmos
Dolby Atmos
Antutu Score
220000
117300
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v8
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 56% of devices
Overall performance better than 50% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Motorola Moto E14

Strengths

The device comes with a charger, cable, and case pre-applied to it, making it a great value for the price.
It has a 90Hz refresh rate, which is surprising at this price point.
The screen-to-body ratio is decent at 84.9%.
The battery size is relatively large at 5000mAh, which should provide good battery life.

Weaknesses

The device only comes with 2GB of RAM, making it a sluggish performer.
The storage type is UFS 2.2, which is slow and not optimal for running apps directly from the phone storage.
The charging speed is limited to 10W, which is slower than the maximum capability of the device.
The operating system is a heavily cut-down version of Android (Go Edition), due to the low RAM capacity.

Samsung Galaxy F12

Strengths

No specific pros listed for this device

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

Read Full Reviews

Motorola Moto E14

The Motorola Moto E14 is a budget device that packs a punch with its features, considering its price tag of around €80. Unboxing the phone reveals a charger, cable, and case, making it an attractive option for those seeking value. The display boasts a 6.56-inch IPS LCD screen with a 90Hz refresh rate, a notable upgrade at this budget level. However, concerns arise regarding the device's internal specs, particularly its meager 2GB of RAM, which may impact performance and make it less suitable as a daily driver.

Samsung Galaxy F12

The Samsung Galaxy F12 is a new budget smartphone that starts from ₹10,999. It boasts a unique textured back with a wave-like pattern, setting it apart from other smartphones in its price range. The device features a 6.5-inch HD+ 90Hz LCD display, which provides punchy colors and a sharp viewing experience. The rear camera setup consists of a 48MP primary sensor, 5MP ultra-wide sensor, 2MP depth sensor, and 2MP macro sensor, offering versatility in capturing various scenes. However, there's no video stabilization, and video recording is limited to 1080p at 30fps. The phone runs on the Exynos 850 chipset with 4GB RAM and 128GB storage, providing a smooth performance. It also features a side-mounted fingerprint scanner, USB Type-C port, and a headphone jack. The device ships with Android 11 and One UI Core 3.1, which is expected to receive updates for a longer period. The Galaxy F12's battery is a 6000mAh unit that should provide a long-lasting experience. However, it only supports 15W charging, which takes around three hours to fully charge the device. Despite this, the phone's pricing seems competitive, and Samsung has done a decent job of packing in features without breaking the bank. Overall, the Galaxy F12 appears to be another solid addition to Samsung's lineup of budget smartphones, offering a feature-rich experience at an affordable price point.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features