Motorola Moto G04vsSamsung Galaxy F13

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Motorola
Motorola Moto G04
Moto G04
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T606
RAM:4GB
Storage:64GB

Quick Stats

The Motorola Moto G04's battery life is surprisingly efficient, lasting through a day with ease always.
The Motorola Moto G04's standout feature is its display with a smooth 90Hz refresh rate, however.
The Motorola Moto G04's disappointing camera performance is a major letdown for potential buyers seeking good photography.
The Motorola Moto G04's performance is acceptable for its price point, but not spectacular overall.
Samsung
Samsung Galaxy F13
Galaxy F13
Processor:Samsung Exynos 850
RAM:4GB
Storage:64GB

Quick Stats

The Samsung Galaxy F13's impressive battery life is its strongest feature and biggest selling point overall.
The Samsung Galaxy F13's average display gets the job done for casual use with good colors and vibrancy mostly.
The Samsung Galaxy F13's camera delivers decent results for its price point, meeting basic photography needs.
The Exynos 850 chipset delivers decent performance at the price point, despite being an entry-level processor from 2020.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
Motorola Moto G04
1.60 GHz
Samsung Galaxy F13
2 GHz

RAM

Tie
Motorola Moto G04
4GB
Samsung Galaxy F13
4GB

Storage

Tie
Motorola Moto G04
64GB
Samsung Galaxy F13
64GB

Weight

Winner
Motorola Moto G04
179g
Samsung Galaxy F13
207g
Rank
Motorola Moto G04
#789
Samsung Galaxy F13
Winner
#720
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
Motorola Moto G04
#761
Samsung Galaxy F13
#680
Winner
Design
Motorola Moto G04
#232
Winner
Samsung Galaxy F13
#788
Display
Motorola Moto G04
#648
Samsung Galaxy F13
#587
Winner
Performance
Motorola Moto G04
#727
Winner
Samsung Galaxy F13
#788
Battery
Motorola Moto G04
#744
Samsung Galaxy F13
#711
Winner
Camera
Motorola Moto G04
#850
Samsung Galaxy F13
#659
Winner

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
Motorola Motorola Moto G04
Samsung Samsung Galaxy F13
Model
Unisoc Tiger T606
Samsung Exynos 850
CPU
2x1.6 GHz Cortex, A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex, A55
4x Cortex, A55 2.0 GHz + 4x Cortex, A55 2.0 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12
8
Frequency
1.60
2
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
ARM Mali-G57
ARM Mali-G52
RAM
4
4
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
64
64
Type
UFS Storage 2.2
eMMC 5.1 Storage
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
N/A
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
Dolby Atmos
N/A
Antutu Score
220000
117300
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v8
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 57% of devices
Overall performance better than 50% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Motorola Moto G04

Strengths

The performance for the price is decent
I like the style of the phone, the screen is nice 90 HZ is nice to see
You're getting decent value here maybe not a supremely exciting phone but a solid little workhorse
It has a 5,000 mAh battery which is decent for everyday usage
The Moto G04 manages fairly well in terms of balance and compromise at this lower price point
The charging is not particularly fast either, but it's still okay for casual users

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

Samsung Galaxy F13

Strengths

Good display
Long battery life
Impressive camera performance
Ad-free UI
Great battery charging time

Weaknesses

Underwhelming peak brightness
Slow ambient light sensor
Limited performance
No stabilization in video recording
Older Exynos 850 chipset
Read Full Reviews

Motorola Moto G04

The Motorola Moto G04 offers decent value for those on a tight budget. It's a solid little workhorse that won't blow you away with performance or camera quality, but will get the job done. The 90Hz screen and 5,000mAh battery are highlights, while the charging speed is underwhelming. For casual users, it's a good option at this price point, but gamers and those who want a more premium experience may find themselves wanting more. A balance of what you get for your money, rather than an exciting phone.

Samsung Galaxy F13

The Samsung Galaxy F13 is a budget smartphone that competes in a crowded market with intense rivalry from other brands. Its design language is unmistakably Samsung, but the phone's plastic build and chunky size may be off-putting to some. The rear panel has a nice texture, making it easier to hold, while the front features a dewdrop notch and thick chin. The phone's 6.6-inch LCD display with full HD resolution and 60Hz refresh rate is a significant improvement over its predecessor, the F12. While the peak brightness is underwhelming, the colors and viewing angles are good. The device is powered by Samsung's Exynos 850 chipset, which may not be the strongest performer in this segment but handles occasional gaming fine. The camera setup includes a 50-megapixel primary sensor, 5-megapixel ultra-wide snapper, and 2-megapixel depth sensor. While the dynamic range is limited, photos are good enough for social media posts. The phone also features an 8-megapixel selfie camera with decent results but no autofocus. One of the standout features of the Galaxy F13 is its large 6000mAh battery, which provides easily two days of battery life even with heavy usage. While charging takes a bit over two hours, the phone's great battery life more than makes up for it. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy F13 is a solid budget smartphone with impressive battery life and an ad-free UI. Its onboard ultra-wide-angle camera is also a plus, making it a good buy for those on a tight budget.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features