Motorola Moto G22vsUlefone Note 10

Motorola Moto G22
#707
Winner
Processor:MediaTek Helio G37
RAM:4 GBGB
Storage:128 GBGB

Quick Stats

The Moto G22's 5000mAh battery offers up to 3 days of light use, making it ideal for users needing extended battery life with minimal recharging.
Motorola Moto G22's 90Hz HD+ display offers smooth visuals and efficient power consumption for budget-friendly performance.
Motorola Moto G22’s 50MP primary camera offers sharp daylight photos but lacks low-light performance and advanced features.
Motorola Moto G22's entry-level performance ensures smooth daily use but struggles with heavy multitasking or gaming.
Ulefone Note 10
#847
Processor:Spreadtrum Unisoc SC9863A
RAM:2 GBGB
Storage:32 GBGB

Quick Stats

The Ulefone Note 10 boasts impressive battery life, lasting over a day and a half with moderate use.
The Ulefone Note 10's display is limited by low brightness and struggles with demanding situations outdoors.
The Ulefone Note 10's camera performance is decent but limited, with inconsistent results and frustrating focus issues often.
The Ulefone Note 10 offers decent performance at an affordable price point, making it a viable option.
Specifications Comparison
Specification
Motorola Motorola Moto G22
Ulefone Ulefone Note 10
Model
MediaTek Helio G37
Spreadtrum Unisoc SC9863A
CPU
8x2.3GHz Cortex, A53
4x Cortex, A55 1.6 GHz + 4x Cortex, A55 1.2 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12 nm
28 nm
Frequency
2,3 GHz
1,6 GHz
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
PowerVR GE832
PowerVR GE8322
RAM
4 GB
2 GB
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
128 GB
32 GB
Type
eMMC 5.1 Storage
eMMC 5.1 Storage
Fingerprint security
Yes, in the back
Yes, in the back
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
N/A
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
N/A
Barometer sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
N/A
N/A
Antutu Score
159800
111300
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v9
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 53% of devices
Overall performance better than 50% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Rankings
Connectivity
Motorola Moto G22
#667
Winner
Ulefone Note 10
#855
Design
Motorola Moto G22
#576
Winner
Ulefone Note 10
#802
Display
Motorola Moto G22
#658
Winner
Ulefone Note 10
#813
Performance
Motorola Moto G22
#767
Winner
Ulefone Note 10
#854
Battery
Motorola Moto G22
#752
Winner
Ulefone Note 10
#850
Camera
Motorola Moto G22
#324
Winner
Ulefone Note 10
#799

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Key Differences

No significant specification differences found between these devices.

Scores by Category
Pros and Cons

Motorola Moto G22

Strengths

Exceptional 5000mAh battery life for extended usage
90Hz HD+ display with smooth scrolling and vibrant visuals
Clean stock Android experience with minimal bloatware
Splash-resistant build for added durability
Affordable price for casual users seeking reliability

Weaknesses

Entry-level performance struggles with heavy multitasking or gaming
Camera setup underperforms in low light and lacks advanced features
No 5G support or expandable storage options
Plastic construction and outdated processor limit premium appeal
Bundled 10W charger slows full battery charging cycles

Ulefone Note 10

Strengths

The phone's performance is surprisingly good, especially considering its price of $100.
The display is pretty decent and suitable for indoor use.
The speaker is surprisingly good, producing decently loud sound with a bit of bass.
The fingerprint sensor and face unlock are both quick and convenient.
The phone's camera performance is decent, despite some focus issues.
The battery life seems to be sufficient, although not specifically mentioned in the review.
The phone's design is sleek and plasticky, but not too cheap-feeling.

Weaknesses

The display doesn't get bright enough for outdoor use.
The camera can struggle with focus, requiring multiple taps on the screen to adjust.
There are some slight stutters in performance when gaming, although they seem to disappear after turning off animations.
The rear-facing camera only has 8 megapixels and a 720p resolution.
The front camera also only has 8 megapixels and a 720p resolution.
Read Full Reviews

Motorola Moto G22

Experience long-lasting battery life and a clean interface with the Motorola Moto G22. A budget-friendly smartphone for seamless everyday use.

Ulefone Note 10

The Ulefone Note 10 is a budget-friendly smartphone that packs a punch with its specs. For $100, you get a phone with two gigs of RAM, 32GB of storage, and a 6.52-inch 720p display. The sc9863a CPU runs on Android 11 Go Edition, and the 5,500mAh battery provides decent power for the device. In terms of design, the Note 10 feels plasticky but not cheap in the hand. The TPU case that comes with it is a nice touch. The display looks good indoors, but brightness is an issue outdoors. The camera setup is decent, with an 8MP rear and front camera. However, autofocus can be slow at times. Performance-wise, the Note 10 surprised me with its snappiness, especially considering its price. Gaming performance was also better than expected, although some frame drops were noticed in demanding games. The speaker gets reasonably loud but suffers from single mono syndrome. The fingerprint sensor and face unlock features work well once you get used to them. The battery life is decent, but not exceptional. Overall, I'd say the Ulefone Note 10 is a solid budget device that delivers on its promise of performance for $100. While it has some minor flaws, such as a dim display and slow autofocus, it's hard to find fault with its overall value proposition. For anyone looking for an affordable smartphone without breaking the bank, the Ulefone Note 10 is definitely worth considering.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features