Motorola Moto G41vsSamsung Galaxy A04e

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Motorola
Motorola Moto G41
Moto G41
Processor:MediaTek Helio G85 (MT6769V/CZ)
RAM:6GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Motorola Moto G41's impressive battery life is its standout feature and most notable selling point overall.
The Motorola Moto G41's vibrant OLED display with great viewing angles is its standout feature and major selling point.
The Motorola Moto G41's camera has a significant drawback, particularly in low-light environments and without OIS.
The Motorola Moto G41's performance is average, suitable for everyday tasks but lacking in gaming or multitasking scenarios.
Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A04e
Galaxy A04e
Processor:MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765
RAM:3GB
Storage:32GB

Quick Stats

The most important takeaway is that the Samsung Galaxy A04e has an impressive and consistent long-lasting battery life.
The Samsung Galaxy A04e's display is its standout feature, offering an enjoyable viewing experience with great value for price.
The Samsung Galaxy A04e's camera has decent features but lacks in certain areas, particularly low-light performance.
The Samsung Galaxy A04e's performance is sufficient for everyday tasks but may be slow with heavy use or multitasking.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
Motorola Moto G41
2 GHz
Samsung Galaxy A04e
2.30 GHz

RAM

Winner
Motorola Moto G41
6GB
Samsung Galaxy A04e
3GB

Storage

Winner
Motorola Moto G41
128GB
Samsung Galaxy A04e
32GB

Weight

Winner
Motorola Moto G41
178g
Samsung Galaxy A04e
188g
Rank
Motorola Moto G41
Winner
#650
Samsung Galaxy A04e
#844
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
Motorola Moto G41
#669
Winner
Samsung Galaxy A04e
#835
Design
Motorola Moto G41
#338
Winner
Samsung Galaxy A04e
#849
Display
Motorola Moto G41
#659
Winner
Samsung Galaxy A04e
#790
Performance
Motorola Moto G41
#702
Winner
Samsung Galaxy A04e
#817
Battery
Motorola Moto G41
#552
Winner
Samsung Galaxy A04e
#832
Camera
Motorola Moto G41
#377
Winner
Samsung Galaxy A04e
#815
item_phones_categoryId
Motorola Moto G41
#1
Tie
Samsung Galaxy A04e
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
Motorola Motorola Moto G41
Samsung Samsung Galaxy A04e
Model
MediaTek Helio G85 (MT6769V/CZ)
MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765
CPU
2x Cortex, A75 2.0 GHz + 6x Cortex, A55 1.8 GHz
4x Cortex, A53 2.3 GHz + 4x Cortex, A53 1.8 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12
14
Frequency
2
2.30
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Arm Mali-G52 MC2 950MHz
PowerVR GE8320
RAM
6
3
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
N/A
Capacity
128
32
Fingerprint security
Yes, in the back
No
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
No
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
N/A
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
N/A
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
N/A
Hall sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
Dolby Atmos, 2 microphones
N/A
Antutu Score
225154
121345
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v9
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 58% of devices
Overall performance better than 51% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Motorola Moto G41

Strengths

The phone features an OLED screen with a PPI of 411
The 5000mAh battery provides long-lasting power
The display is brilliant when playing games
The phone's audio quality is also impressive

Weaknesses

The Motorola Moto G41 is a relatively slow phone
The camera quality could be better
The phone only receives one Android update and three years of security patches
The pricing is a bit steep for some users

Samsung Galaxy A04e

Strengths

Decent performance
Large battery life
Good value
Android 12 software
Samsung's skin
Long-lasting battery
Good camera performance
Unique design

Weaknesses

Slow processor
Limited RAM
No 5G support
No NFC
Plastic construction
Average camera performance
Older processor
Read Full Reviews

Motorola Moto G41

The Motorola Moto G41: a budget-friendly device that's making waves with its impressive OLED screen and long-lasting 5000mAh battery. With a 6.4-inch display that boasts stunning viewing angles, this phone is a joy to use for watching YouTube videos and streaming Netflix content. Add to that a snappy performance, albeit not the most powerful, and you have a solid device that's perfect for everyday tasks. But does it hold up against its peers? And are there any notable drawbacks? Let's dive in and find out.

Samsung Galaxy A04e

The Samsung Galaxy A04e is a budget-friendly smartphone that offers decent performance and features at an affordable price. The device is made of plastic, except for the glass display, which is typical of its segment. However, I appreciate the unique wavy design on the back, which makes up for the glossy finish. Under the hood, the phone is powered by a Mediatek Helio P35 processor and 3GB of RAM. While it's not the most powerful combination, it should handle basic tasks like phone calls, text messages, watching videos, and occasional social media use without any issues. However, heavy users may experience some slowdowns. The camera department is another highlight of this device. It features a dual-camera setup with additional modes like Pro mode, Panorama, food mode, and hyperlapse. While not the most advanced cameras, they're decent for their price point. Other notable features include a 5,000mAh battery, which should provide generous battery life, Android 12 with Samsung's skin laid over, and a 3.5mm headphone jack. Unfortunately, it lacks NFC, making mobile contactless payments impossible. In terms of hardware, the phone is relatively low-end, but its price point makes up for that. If you're looking for a reliable device from a reputable brand without breaking the bank, the Samsung Galaxy A04e might be worth considering.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features