Motorola Moto G52vsUlefone Armor 15

Motorola Moto G52
#552
Winner
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (SM6225)
RAM:4 GBGB
Storage:128 GBGB

Quick Stats

The Moto G52’s 5000 mAh battery delivers 2-day endurance with 30W fast charging for rapid power-ups.
The Moto G52’s 6.6\" AMOLED display offers FHD+ resolution, 90Hz refresh rate, and Corning Gorilla Glass 5 for vibrant, durable visuals.
Triple rear cameras with 50MP main sensor, 4K video, and versatile features for diverse photography.
Snapdragon 680 with 4GB/6GB RAM ensures smooth multitasking and efficient performance for casual users.
Ulefone Armor 15
#762
Processor:Mediatek Helio G35
RAM:6 GBGB
Storage:128 GBGB

Quick Stats

The Ulefone Armor 15 boasts an impressive battery life, lasting over 36 hours with moderate use consistently.
The main issue with the Ulefone Armor 15 is its low screen brightness, particularly outdoors.
The Ulefone Armor 15's camera is adequate for casual use, but lacks advanced features and impressive image quality overall.
The Ulefone Armor 15's performance is sluggish and disappointing, especially for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing.
Specifications Comparison
Specification
Motorola Motorola Moto G52
Ulefone Ulefone Armor 15
Model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (SM6225)
Mediatek Helio G35
CPU
4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold + 4x1.9GHz Kryo 265 Silver
8x Cortex, A53 2.3 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
6 nm
12 nm
Frequency
2,4 GHz
2,3 GHz
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Adreno 610
IMG PowerVR GE8320 680MHz
RAM
4 GB
6 GB
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
128 GB
128 GB
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Audio
Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones
Stereo Speakers
Antutu Score
216000
122000
Antutu Version
Antutu v9
Antutu v9
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 56% of devices
Overall performance better than 52% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Rankings
Connectivity
Motorola Moto G52
#666
Winner
Ulefone Armor 15
#745
Design
Motorola Moto G52
#242
Ulefone Armor 15
#134
Winner
Display
Motorola Moto G52
#337
Winner
Ulefone Armor 15
#844
Performance
Motorola Moto G52
#731
Winner
Ulefone Armor 15
#762
Battery
Motorola Moto G52
#255
Winner
Ulefone Armor 15
#784
Camera
Motorola Moto G52
#479
Winner
Ulefone Armor 15
#784

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Key Differences

No significant specification differences found between these devices.

Scores by Category
Pros and Cons

Motorola Moto G52

Strengths

Long-lasting 5000 mAh battery with 30W fast charging for 2-day endurance.
Vibrant 6.6" AMOLED display with 90Hz refresh rate and 400 PPI clarity.
Triple rear camera system (50MP main, 8MP wide, 2MP macro) for versatile photography.
Premium-feeling frosted plastic build with 3.5mm headphone jack and dual speakers.
Balanced performance from Snapdragon 680 with 4GB/6GB RAM for smooth multitasking.

Weaknesses

No 5G support (limited to 4G connectivity).
Plastic construction may feel less premium than glass.
Lacks optical image stabilization for sharper low-light photos.
No expandable storage (no microSD slot).
Average Antutu score (~216,000) limits heavy gaming/performance tasks.
90Hz refresh rate, while smooth, trails behind competitors with 120Hz+ displays.

Ulefone Armor 15

Strengths

The phone has built-in wireless earbuds that connect automatically when removed from the phone.
The earbuds sound pretty good, getting fairly loud with a lot of bass (although they don't support active noise cancellation or transparency mode).
The phone's speakers are also quite loud and face you when holding the device.
The phone has a customizable key that can open any application.
The fingerprint scanner is fast and reliable.
The phone supports NFC payments with Google Pay.
The price of the phone is inexpensive, making it hard to criticize its limitations.

Weaknesses

The screen doesn't get very bright, making it difficult to see outside.
The phone's CPU (Mediatek G35) is not fast, resulting in slower app loading and performance.
The phone's camera quality is decent at best, but not exceptional.
Read Full Reviews

Motorola Moto G52

Powerful budget smartphone with vibrant visuals, 2-day battery endurance, and premium feel—ideal for everyday use and multimedia.

Ulefone Armor 15

The Ulefone Armor 15 is a rugged smartphone that boasts impressive features at an affordable price. The device's design is unique, with two rubber flaps on top that conceal built-in wireless earbuds. These earbuds connect to the phone and can be used for hands-free calls, music streaming, and more. They are always charged and stored within the phone, eliminating the need for a separate charging case. The Armor 15 has a 5.45-inch IPS screen with a 720p resolution, which is decent but not exceptional. The device's performance is powered by the Mediatek G35 CPU, paired with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage. While it's capable of running most applications, it's not the fastest phone on the market, with an Antutu score of around 130,000. The camera setup includes a main camera, ultra-wide camera, and selfie camera, but don't expect high-quality images from these cameras. The phone also features an NFC chip for contactless payments and a GPS unit that takes a few seconds to find your location. While the Armor 15 has some impressive features, such as its wireless earbuds and speakers, it's not the fastest or most powerful smartphone out there. However, considering its affordable price, it's hard to criticize it too harshly. Overall, the Ulefone Armor 15 is a solid choice for those looking for a rugged phone with unique features at an budget-friendly price.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features