We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Metric | Motorola Moto G53 | realme Narzo 50A |
---|---|---|
Connectivity | #320 Winner | #830 |
Design | #569 Winner | #775 |
Display | #569 Winner | #780 |
Performance | #562 Winner | #734 |
Battery | #699 Winner | #769 |
Camera | #612 | #446 Winner |
Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
The Motorola Moto G53 is an affordable smartphone that offers a pure Android experience without the bloat of unnecessary software. Priced at £189, it's a budget-friendly option for those who want a hassle-free device with decent specs. The phone boasts a 5,000mAh battery, which provides more than a day of use, and a 50MP primary camera with a 2MP macro sensor. While the display may not be top-notch, the Moto G53's strengths lie in its efficient performance, snappy interface, and reliable battery life.
The Realme Narzo 50A is an affordable smartphone priced from Rs. 11,999 in India. While it checks all the right boxes on paper, its worthiness of the price tag remains uncertain. Design-wise, the phone sticks to Realme's familiar principles with a simple yet practical back panel made of polycarbonate. The rear camera module extends till the center of the phone and engulfs the fingerprint reader, making it sometimes difficult to find. However, the grooved texture on the back helps with grip due to its big and heavy build at 207 grams. Performance-wise, the Realme Narzo 50A is decent for casual gaming but struggles with heavy games. The Mediatek Helio G85 Soc doesn't always allow heavy games to run smoothly, with Call of Duty Mobile just playable at default low graphics settings. Moreover, the phone warmed up quickly during gameplay. In terms of display, the phone features a 6.5-inch HD+ screen with a water drop style notch that looks outdated compared to punch-hole displays offered by competitors. However, the display looked sufficiently sharp and had decent viewing angles. Battery life is an area where the Narzo 50A excels, lasting two whole days with casual gaming and up to three days on light usage. The cameras, though impressive on paper, failed to impress in real-world scenarios. The primary camera struggled to produce detailed photos, especially when zoomed in. Selfies had good detail but looked over-sharpened, and the portrait mode was subpar. Macros weren't great either, looking over-sharpened and dramatic. In conclusion, the Realme Narzo 50A is a smartphone with reliable battery life and basic features. However, it's not ideal for gamers due to its performance limitations. Its cameras also fall short of expectations. Overall, this phone is best suited for those seeking a budget option with long battery life but can live with average cameras, design, and performance.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features