Motorola Moto G60vsXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+

Motorola Moto G60

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+

Motorola Moto G60

The Motorola Moto G60 is an intriguing mid-range smartphone that checks many boxes on the feature list. Priced around $300, this device boasts a massive 6,000mAh battery, 108MP back camera, and 4K-capable front camera with LED flash. Other notable specs include a high-refresh-rate display (120Hz), 8nm Qualcomm processor, and 4GB RAM. This phone offers impressive value for its price, making it a strong contender in the budget-friendly market.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ is a mid-range device that brings two distinct models: one with a 4G chipset and the other with a 5G capable one. Despite their differences in chipsets, both devices share an identical look and feel, along with nearly the same specs. The phone's design features a flat glass back and plastic frame with a matte metallic finish, making it sleek and minimalistic. The IP53-rated dust and splashproofing is a premium feature that returns from last year. Both devices have a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 1080p resolution, Gorilla Glass 5 protection, and a fast 120Hz refresh rate. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ has a 108MP main camera, an 8MP ultrawide lens, a 2MP macro cam, and a depth sensor. While the camera performance is decent for its class, it lacks HDR10 support and 4K video recording, which was available on last year's model. In terms of performance, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ has a MediaTek Helio G96 chipset, which is less powerful than the one in the 5G version. As a result, the battery life is also not as long-lasting, with a 100-hour endurance compared to the 5G model's 150 hours. The phone's cameras produce good results, especially in low-light conditions and portrait mode. However, the ultrawide camera struggles with dynamic range and noise reduction. Selfies from the 16MP front camera are also decent but lack resolved detail. Overall, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ has some standout features like its AMOLED display and fast charging, it falls short of last year's model in terms of performance and camera capabilities. Its price is also not competitive with other devices on the market, making it a less desirable option for those seeking value.