Motorola Razr 40 UltravsXiaomi Redmi K50

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
#279
Winner
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen1
RAM:8 GBGB
Storage:256 GBGB

Quick Stats

The Razr 40 Ultra offers a 3800 mAh battery with 30W fast charging and 83-hour endurance, though external screen heat may slightly impact longevity.
The Razr 40 Ultra features a vibrant 6.9-inch pOLED display with 165Hz refresh and 1400 cd/m² brightness, paired with a 144Hz cover screen for seamless multitasking.
The Razr 40 Ultra’s dual rear cameras (12MP + 13MP) offer 4K video, night mode, advanced autofocus, and a 32MP front camera for sharp, versatile results.
The Razr 40 Ultra delivers flagship performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen1, 8–12GB RAM, Adreno 730 GPU, and an Antutu score of 1,238,000.
Xiaomi Redmi K50
#315
Processor:MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Max
RAM:8 GBGB
Storage:128 GBGB

Quick Stats

The Xiaomi Redmi K50's battery life is disappointing, lasting around 4-5 hours with heavy use, a major letdown.
The Xiaomi Redmi K50's high-quality AMOLED display is its standout feature, offering a smooth viewing experience with vibrant colors.
The Xiaomi Redmi K50's camera is a major letdown due to poor low-light performance and unnatural results.
The Xiaomi Redmi K50 delivers mixed results, with decent performance for gaming and multitasking being its strongest aspect.
Specifications Comparison
Specification
Motorola Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Xiaomi Xiaomi Redmi K50
Model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen1
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Max
CPU
1x3.2 GHz Cortex, X2 +3x2.8 GHz Cortex, A710 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex, A510
4x Cortex, A78 2.85 GHz + 4x Cortex, A55 2.0 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
4 nm
5 nm
Frequency
3,2 GHz
2,8 GHz
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Qualcomm Adreno 730 875 MHz
Mali-G610 MC6
RAM
8 GB
8 GB
Type
RAM LPDDR5
RAM LPDDR5
Capacity
256 GB
128 GB
Type
UFS Storage 3.1
UFS Storage 3.1
SD slot
No
No
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
N/A
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Gravity sensor
Yes
N/A
RGB sensor
N/A
Yes
Ultrasonic proximity virtual sensor
N/A
Yes
Audio
Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers, 3 microphones
Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones
Antutu Score
1238000
824926
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 89% of devices
Overall performance better than 82% of devices
Cooling system
No
Yes
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
Super large VC liquid-cooled heat dissipation 3950 mm2

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Rankings
Connectivity
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
#141
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi K50
#277
Design
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
#170
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi K50
#709
Display
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
#283
Xiaomi Redmi K50
#89
Winner
Performance
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
#147
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi K50
#306
Battery
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
#453
Xiaomi Redmi K50
#147
Winner
Camera
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
#696
Xiaomi Redmi K50
#519
Winner

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Key Differences

No significant specification differences found between these devices.

Scores by Category
Pros and Cons

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Strengths

Premium foldable clamshell design with a durable 7000-series aluminum frame and refined hinge technology.
Dual high-refresh-rate displays (165Hz main screen, 144Hz cover screen) for vibrant visuals and seamless multitasking.
30W fast charging, 8W wireless charging, and reverse charging for rapid power replenishment and versatility.
Advanced camera system with optical stabilization, 4K video, and phase/laser autofocus for sharp, detailed results.
Flagship Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 chipset and up to 12GB RAM for smooth performance and multitasking efficiency.
Android 15 with 5G, Wi-Fi 6E, and eSIM support, ensuring future-proof connectivity and software features.

Weaknesses

Premium price tag (unspecified) may limit accessibility for budget-conscious buyers.
Foldable design and external screen may be prone to wear or damage over time despite IP52 protection.
External screen can heat up during prolonged use, potentially impacting battery life and performance.
Camera megapixel details for rear lenses are unspecified, which may deter photography enthusiasts.
Limited app optimization for dual-display setups could lead to inconsistent user experiences.
No exact price or release timeline provided, creating uncertainty for potential buyers.

Xiaomi Redmi K50

Strengths

The display is great, with high refresh rate gaming performance, even if Asphalt 9 hasn't adapted to it.
Battery life for gaming and everyday use is good, with up to 8 hours of screen time.
The camera takes phenomenal daytime photos with high dynamic range and detail.
The phone has great speakers that are perfect for music and gaming.

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

Read Full Reviews

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Experience the future of mobile with the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra—sleek foldable design meets vibrant dual displays for an immersive, premium experience.

Xiaomi Redmi K50

I recently had the opportunity to try out the Xiaomi Redmi K50, and unfortunately, my experience was underwhelming. Despite its impressive specs on paper, this phone failed to deliver in several key areas. The camera performance was abysmal, especially in low-light conditions. The sensor size is decent, but it seems that the software is not optimized to extract the best from it. Daytime photos are okay, but nowhere near as good as what I've seen on other phones with similar cameras. The gaming experience was actually quite enjoyable, thanks to the phone's powerful processor and snappy performance. However, only a few games, like Asphalt 9, have adapted to take full advantage of the phone's high refresh rate capabilities. Battery life is decent for general use, but drops significantly when gaming or using resource-intensive apps. The display is nice, and the speakers are quite good, making it enjoyable to watch videos or listen to music on this phone. My biggest disappointment lies in the camera performance, which I believe is a software issue rather than a hardware one. For a phone priced around $500-$600, there are better options available that offer superior camera capabilities. If you're a gamer and don't mind a mediocre camera experience, then the Redmi K50 might be worth considering. However, if you prioritize taking good photos or have high expectations for your camera, I would suggest looking elsewhere. There are simply better phones on the market that offer more value for the price.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features