Oppo A3 4GvsZTE Blade A53 Pro

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Oppo
Oppo A3 4G
A3 4G
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen3
RAM:4GB
Storage:64GB

Quick Stats

The Oppo A3 4G's long-lasting battery life is a standout feature, offering up to two days of moderate use.
The display is solid, providing vivid colors and decent contrast, despite some minor flaws in darker scenes.
The Oppo A3 4G's disappointing camera performance makes it hard to recommend as a top camera-centric device overall.
The Oppo A3 4G's performance is average, but sufficient for everyday tasks and entry-level gaming with adjusted settings.
ZTE
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
Blade A53 Pro
Processor:Spreadtrum Unisoc SC9863A
RAM:4GB
Storage:64GB

Quick Stats

The ZTE Blade A53 Pro's battery life is underwhelming, even by budget phone standards, and a significant letdown.
The ZTE Blade A53 Pro's subpar display is its major downfall and main drawback overall.
The ZTE Blade A53 Pro's camera system is a major disappointment with poor image quality overall.
The ZTE Blade A53 Pro's underwhelming performance makes it a poor choice for seamless smartphone experiences overall.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
Oppo A3 4G
2.30 GHz
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
1.60 GHz

RAM

Tie
Oppo A3 4G
4GB
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
4GB

Storage

Tie
Oppo A3 4G
64GB
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
64GB

Weight

Winner
Oppo A3 4G
186g
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
198g
Rank
Oppo A3 4G
Winner
#692
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#850
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
Oppo A3 4G
#718
Winner
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#858
Design
Oppo A3 4G
#517
Winner
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#839
Display
Oppo A3 4G
#702
Winner
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#838
Performance
Oppo A3 4G
#532
Winner
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#839
Battery
Oppo A3 4G
#412
Winner
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#853
Camera
Oppo A3 4G
#831
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#824
Winner
item_phones_categoryId
Oppo A3 4G
#1
Tie
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
Oppo Oppo A3 4G
ZTE ZTE Blade A53 Pro
Model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen3
Spreadtrum Unisoc SC9863A
CPU
Kryo 2x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex, A78 +6x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex, A55
4x Cortex, A55 1.6 GHz + 4x Cortex, A55 1.2 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
6
28
Frequency
2.30
1.60
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Qualcomm Adreno 619
PowerVR GE8322
RAM
4
4
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4 RAM
Capacity
64
64
Type
eMMC 5.1 Storage
eMMC 5.1 Storage
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, in the back
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
No
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
N/A
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers
N/A
Antutu Score
575000
112000
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v9
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 77% of devices
Overall performance better than 49% of devices
Cooling system
Yes
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Oppo A3 4G

Strengths

The phone has a premium design that looks good, especially with its iPhone-like aesthetic.
It has a triple card slot, allowing for expandable storage via microSD.
The phone is said to be drop-resistant and military standard (810h), which adds an extra layer of durability.
The camera has a 50MP main sensor with a wide aperture, capable of taking decent photos in good lighting conditions.
The battery life is reportedly good, lasting up to four years with moderate use.

Weaknesses

The phone's performance is merely 'so-so', lacking the power expected from a mid-range device.
The camera performance is subpar, especially in low-light conditions and when using the front-facing camera.
The front-facing camera resolution is very bad and shaky, making it unsuitable for any type of photography beyond video chatting.
The phone's Snapdragon 6s gen one chip is reportedly a rebranded older model (Snapdragon 685), which may lead to performance issues.
The phone's price point of 9,000 pesos seems too high considering its relatively weak specs and camera capabilities compared to other options like the Infinix Hot 3 4G.

ZTE Blade A53 Pro

Strengths

The phone comes with a screen protector, which is a nice surprise.
It has 4GB of RAM and 64GB of storage, although some of it may be reserved for system use.
The device has a dual camera setup, even if the cameras are not impressive
The phone's price is relatively low at $150.
It comes with a SIM tool and a charger

Weaknesses

The packaging is cheap and flimsy.
The charging port is micro USB, which is outdated and a major inconvenience.
The cameras are not impressive, especially the 2MP sensor
The display has a low resolution of 720p and no high refresh rate
The processor is weak and not powerful enough to handle demanding tasks
Read Full Reviews

Oppo A3 4G

The Oppo A3 4G is an intriguing smartphone that boasts premium features at an affordable price point of 8,999 pesos. With its sleek design and iPhone-like aesthetics, it's hard to ignore its attractive exterior. The phone also comes with a range of impressive specs, including a 6nm Snapdragon 680 processor, 128GB storage, and 5,100mAh battery. But is it worth the hype? Our review will delve into the device's performance, camera capabilities, and gaming experience to help you decide if this phone is truly worth its price tag.

ZTE Blade A53 Pro

The ZTE Blade A53 Pro - a budget smartphone that falls short on several fronts. With a subpar display resolution, outdated micro USB charging port, and questionable camera setup, this device struggles to justify its $150 price tag. Add to that a weak processor, limited storage, and no NFC or 5G capabilities, and you're left with a phone that feels like a major compromise. Can it still be considered a budget option, or is it simply not worth the money?

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features