Oppo A3 4GvsZTE Blade A73 5G

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Oppo
Oppo A3 4G
A3 4G
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen3
RAM:4GB
Storage:64GB

Quick Stats

The Oppo A3 4G's long-lasting battery life is a standout feature, offering up to two days of moderate use.
The display is solid, providing vivid colors and decent contrast, despite some minor flaws in darker scenes.
The Oppo A3 4G's disappointing camera performance makes it hard to recommend as a top camera-centric device overall.
The Oppo A3 4G's performance is average, but sufficient for everyday tasks and entry-level gaming with adjusted settings.
ZTE
ZTE Blade A73 5G
Blade A73 5G
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T760
RAM:4GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The ZTE Blade A73 5G offers impressive battery life, lasting up to two days with moderate use.
The ZTE Blade A73 5G's stunning display with 90Hz refresh rate is its standout feature overall.
The ZTE Blade A73 5G's camera is decent but struggles with low-light photography.
The ZTE Blade A73 5G's performance is adequate for everyday tasks but limited for demanding activities like gaming.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
Oppo A3 4G
2.30 GHz
ZTE Blade A73 5G
2.20 GHz

RAM

Tie
Oppo A3 4G
4GB
ZTE Blade A73 5G
4GB

Storage

Winner
Oppo A3 4G
64GB
ZTE Blade A73 5G
128GB

Weight

Winner
Oppo A3 4G
186g
ZTE Blade A73 5G
200g
Rank
Oppo A3 4G
Winner
#692
ZTE Blade A73 5G
#754
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
Oppo A3 4G
#718
ZTE Blade A73 5G
#609
Winner
Design
Oppo A3 4G
#517
Winner
ZTE Blade A73 5G
#745
Display
Oppo A3 4G
#702
ZTE Blade A73 5G
#701
Winner
Performance
Oppo A3 4G
#532
Winner
ZTE Blade A73 5G
#669
Battery
Oppo A3 4G
#412
Winner
ZTE Blade A73 5G
#681
Camera
Oppo A3 4G
#831
Winner
ZTE Blade A73 5G
#860
item_phones_categoryId
Oppo A3 4G
#1
Tie
ZTE Blade A73 5G
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
Oppo Oppo A3 4G
ZTE ZTE Blade A73 5G
Model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen3
Unisoc Tiger T760
CPU
Kryo 2x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex, A78 +6x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex, A55
4x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex, A76 +4x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex, A55
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
6
6
Frequency
2.30
2.20
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Qualcomm Adreno 619
ARM Mali-G57 MP4
RAM
4
4
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
64
128
Type
eMMC 5.1 Storage
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Audio
Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers
N/A
Antutu Score
575000
390176
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 77% of devices
Overall performance better than 68% of devices
Cooling system
Yes
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Oppo A3 4G

Strengths

The phone has a premium design that looks good, especially with its iPhone-like aesthetic.
It has a triple card slot, allowing for expandable storage via microSD.
The phone is said to be drop-resistant and military standard (810h), which adds an extra layer of durability.
The camera has a 50MP main sensor with a wide aperture, capable of taking decent photos in good lighting conditions.
The battery life is reportedly good, lasting up to four years with moderate use.

Weaknesses

The phone's performance is merely 'so-so', lacking the power expected from a mid-range device.
The camera performance is subpar, especially in low-light conditions and when using the front-facing camera.
The front-facing camera resolution is very bad and shaky, making it unsuitable for any type of photography beyond video chatting.
The phone's Snapdragon 6s gen one chip is reportedly a rebranded older model (Snapdragon 685), which may lead to performance issues.
The phone's price point of 9,000 pesos seems too high considering its relatively weak specs and camera capabilities compared to other options like the Infinix Hot 3 4G.

ZTE Blade A73 5G

Strengths

The phone is priced reasonably at Ringgit Malaysia 749, making it an affordable option.
It features 5G Network, which is a significant selling point given its price point.
The phone has a large 6.52 HD Plus display running at a 90 Hertz refresh rate.
The 5000 milliamp hour battery provides decent battery life for its price.
The phone's performance is reasonable, making it suitable for casual gaming and general use.
The adaptive 5G feature allows users to prioritize certain applications for 5G data usage.

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

Read Full Reviews

Oppo A3 4G

The Oppo A3 4G is an intriguing smartphone that boasts premium features at an affordable price point of 8,999 pesos. With its sleek design and iPhone-like aesthetics, it's hard to ignore its attractive exterior. The phone also comes with a range of impressive specs, including a 6nm Snapdragon 680 processor, 128GB storage, and 5,100mAh battery. But is it worth the hype? Our review will delve into the device's performance, camera capabilities, and gaming experience to help you decide if this phone is truly worth its price tag.

ZTE Blade A73 5G

The ZTE Blade A73 5G is an affordable smartphone that boasts impressive features for its price point. Priced at RM749 in Malaysia, this device offers a balance between affordability and performance. With a 6.52-inch HD+ display, 5000mAh battery, and 128GB internal storage, it's a solid option for those on a budget. The phone also supports 5G connectivity, making it an attractive choice for those who want to future-proof their devices without breaking the bank. Let's dive deeper into its features and see how it stacks up against other options in this segment.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Read Oppo A3 4G ReviewRead ZTE Blade A73 5G Review

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features