Oppo A3 ProvsSharp Aquos R7s

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Oppo
Oppo A3 Pro
A3 Pro
Processor:MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (MT6877)
RAM:8GB
Storage:256GB

Quick Stats

The Oppo A3 Pro's battery life is solid and sufficient for most users' needs, with some limitations.
The Oppo A3 Pro's display is functional but average, suitable for general use, not spectacular overall.
The Oppo A3 Pro's camera experience falls short of expectations due to compromised image quality and features.
The Oppo A3 Pro's performance is decent for everyday tasks but struggles with gaming and multitasking demands.
Sharp
Sharp Aquos R7s
Aquos R7s
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1
RAM:12GB
Storage:256GB

Quick Stats

The Sharp Aquos R7's battery life is sufficient for daily use with moderate to heavy usage.
The Sharp Aquos R7's EXO display offers exceptional visuals with natural color reproduction and energy efficiency.
The Sharp Aquos R7's natural-looking images with accurate color reproduction are its most notable camera feature.
The Sharp Aquos R7's exceptional performance rivals top-tier smartphones, offering a seamless experience for demanding users always.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
Oppo A3 Pro
2.60 GHz
Sharp Aquos R7s
3 GHz

RAM

Winner
Oppo A3 Pro
8GB
Sharp Aquos R7s
12GB

Storage

Tie
Oppo A3 Pro
256GB
Sharp Aquos R7s
256GB

Weight

Winner
Oppo A3 Pro
177g
Sharp Aquos R7s
208g
Rank
Oppo A3 Pro
Winner
#476
Sharp Aquos R7s
#544
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
Oppo A3 Pro
#453
Sharp Aquos R7s
#40
Winner
Design
Oppo A3 Pro
#319
Sharp Aquos R7s
#146
Winner
Display
Oppo A3 Pro
#402
Winner
Sharp Aquos R7s
#849
Performance
Oppo A3 Pro
#422
Sharp Aquos R7s
#233
Winner
Battery
Oppo A3 Pro
#528
Sharp Aquos R7s
#524
Winner
Camera
Oppo A3 Pro
#625
Winner
Sharp Aquos R7s
#756
item_phones_categoryId
Oppo A3 Pro
#1
Tie
Sharp Aquos R7s
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
Oppo Oppo A3 Pro
Sharp Sharp Aquos R7s
Model
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (MT6877)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1
CPU
2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex, A78+6x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex, A55
1x3.0GHz Cortex X2 + 3x2.5GHz Cortex A710 + 4x1.80GHz Cortex A510
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
6
4
Frequency
2.60
3
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Mali-G68 MC4
Adreno 730
RAM
8
12
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
RAM LPDDR5
Capacity
256
256
Type
UFS Storage 3.1
UFS Storage 3.1
Fingerprint security
Yes, in screen
Yes, in screen
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
N/A
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Gravity sensor
N/A
Yes
Hall sensor
Yes
Yes
Geomagnetic sensor
Yes
Yes
Audio
N/A
Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers
Antutu Score
545000
900000
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v9
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 76% of devices
Overall performance better than 87% of devices
Cooling system
Yes
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Oppo A3 Pro

Strengths

For about $200 you're going to get a very good sturdy phone
The display is good kind of display over here
The software experience is actually pretty decent and it doesn't really fail you that much
The battery is normal for a full day of usage

Weaknesses

You won't get an ultra wide lens, which would make a lot of difference
The rear cameras are not the best, especially under good lighting conditions
The selfie camera's sharpness is not the best, but it still gives you a good amount of details
The software has to cut some corners to give you more of a simple approach

Sharp Aquos R7s

Strengths

The Sharp Aquos R7 features a high-quality EXO display known for its excellent color accuracy and Energy Efficiency.
Its EXO display is praised for its natural color reproduction, high pixel density, and smooth performance up to 240Hz refresh rate.
The Sharp Aquos R7 offers expandable memory support allowing users to store a vast amount of content without worrying about running out of space.
It stands out as a more affordable option compared to the Google Pixel 8 Pro despite offering comparable features and performance.
The Sharp Aquos R7's camera system prioritizes natural-looking images through its large 1-in sensor, resulting in detailed and high-quality images.
The EXO display on the Sharp Aquos R7 has a peak brightness of 200 nits, making it suitable for outdoor use.
It offers excellent value for money with its competitive pricing and solid performance.

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

Read Full Reviews

Oppo A3 Pro

The Oppo A3 Pro is a budget-friendly smartphone that offers a compelling package for its price point. With a sturdy build and decent display, this phone is perfect for those looking for a reliable device without breaking the bank. The software experience is also noteworthy, with a clean interface and AI-driven features that make it suitable for everyday use. While the camera capabilities may not be the strongest, they are still respectable given the phone's price. This review aims to provide an in-depth look at the Oppo A3 Pro's strengths and weaknesses.

Sharp Aquos R7s

The Sharp Aquos R7 from Japan and the Google Pixel 8 Pro from the USA are two flagship smartphones that offer unique features and functionalities. While both devices boast premium construction and sleek designs, they cater to different preferences in photography. The Aquos R7 excels in capturing natural-looking images with its large sensor camera system, whereas the Pixel 8 Pro leverages AI-enhanced imaging capabilities for vibrant and detailed shots. This review will delve into the strengths of each device and compare their performance in various aspects, ultimately determining which one stands out as the better choice.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features