POCO C61vsSamsung Galaxy F04
We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
POCO C61
#1042
+12
Processor:Mediatek Helio G36
RAM:3 GBGB
Storage:64 GBGB
Quick Stats
The POCO C61's 5000mAh battery lasts up to two days but charges slowly at 10W.
The POCO C61's 6.7-inch 720p display offers 90Hz refresh and 500 nits brightness for budget-friendly performance.
The POCO C61's basic dual-camera setup offers autofocus and HDR but struggles in low light and lacks advanced features.
POCO C61's MediaTek Helio G36 and 3-6GB RAM handle light tasks but struggle with heavy gaming or multitasking.
Samsung Galaxy F04
#1038
Winner
+14
Processor:MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765
RAM:4 GBGB
Storage:64 GBGB
Quick Stats
The Galaxy F04's 5000mAh battery with 15W fast charging ensures long-lasting power and quick recharges.
The Galaxy F04's 6.5-inch LCD display offers HD+ resolution, 270 PPI, and an immersive 20:9 aspect ratio for everyday use.
The Galaxy F04's dual-camera system offers basic portrait mode and adequate performance for everyday photography.
MediaTek Helio P35 processor with 4GB RAM delivers smooth performance for everyday tasks.
Specifications Comparison
Specification
POCO POCO C61
Samsung Samsung Galaxy F04
Model
Mediatek Helio G36
MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765
CPU
8x Cortex, A53 2.2 GHz
4x Cortex, A53 2.3 GHz + 4x Cortex, A53 1.8 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12 nm
14 nm
Frequency
2,2 GHz
2,3 GHz
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
IMG PowerVR GE8320 680 MHz
PowerVR GE8320
RAM
3 GB
4 GB
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
N/A
Capacity
64 GB
64 GB
Type
eMMC 5.1 Storage
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
No
Fingerprint sensor
No
No
Proximity sensor
N/A
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
N/A
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Gravity sensor
Yes
N/A
Ultrasonic proximity virtual sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
N/A
N/A
Antutu Score
127000
121534
Antutu Version
Antutu v9
Antutu v9
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 52% of devices
Overall performance better than 52% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
Rankings
Connectivity
POCO C61
#1045
Samsung Galaxy F04
#1028
Winner
Design
POCO C61
#1037
Winner
Samsung Galaxy F04
#1044
Display
POCO C61
#1033
Samsung Galaxy F04
#979
Winner
Performance
POCO C61
#1023
Samsung Galaxy F04
#974
Winner
Battery
POCO C61
#1004
Winner
Samsung Galaxy F04
#1027
Camera
POCO C61
#1046
Samsung Galaxy F04
#1003
Winner
| Metric | POCO C61 | Samsung Galaxy F04 |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity | #1045 | #1028 Winner |
| Design | #1037 Winner | #1044 |
| Display | #1033 | #979 Winner |
| Performance | #1023 | #974 Winner |
| Battery | #1004 Winner | #1027 |
| Camera | #1046 | #1003 Winner |
Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.
Key Differences
No significant specification differences found between these devices.
Scores by Category
Pros and Cons
POCO C61
Strengths
Long-lasting battery with 5000mAh capacity for up to 2 days of casual use.
Durable build with Corning Gorilla Glass 3 and a lightweight, portable design.
Affordable price with essential features like dual SIM, Wi-Fi 5, and Bluetooth 5.4.
Clear display with 500 nits peak brightness and smooth 180Hz touch sampling.
Basic performance sufficient for everyday tasks like browsing, calls, and light media.
Weaknesses
Underpowered processor struggles with heavy multitasking or gaming.
Modest 8MP rear camera with limited low-light performance and no optical zoom.
720p resolution and 268 PPI display may feel outdated for modern standards.
Slow 10W charging speed requires overnight recharging for full capacity.
Samsung Galaxy F04
Strengths
Long-lasting 5000mAh battery with 15W fast charging for extended use.
Stylish design with a glossy back panel and vibrant color options.
Dual-camera system offering basic portrait mode and HDR capabilities.
Android 12 with promised software updates up to Android 14.
Affordable price point for budget-conscious users.
Sleek, lightweight build with a slim 9.1mm profile for portability.
Weaknesses
Plastic construction may feel less premium compared to metal or glass.
LCD display lacks the brightness and color depth of modern OLED panels.
Entry-level MediaTek Helio P35 processor limits performance for heavy tasks.
5MP front camera may not meet expectations for high-quality selfies.
No fingerprint sensor; relies solely on face unlock for security.
Lacks USB-C 3.0 and NFC for modern connectivity and convenience.
Read Full Reviews
POCO C61
POCO C61: A budget-friendly phone with long-lasting battery, clear display, and essential features for everyday use. Lightweight and durable, perfect for calls, texts, and light browsing.
Samsung Galaxy F04
Stylish design meets reliable performance in the Galaxy F04, featuring dual cameras, face unlock, and a long-lasting battery with Android updates.
Need help choosing?
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Compare other phones
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Compare phones
VS
VS
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features