POCO C71vsZTE Blade A75
We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
POCO C71
#967
+15
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T615 (T7250)
RAM:3 GBGB
Storage:64 GBGB
Quick Stats
POCO C71’s 5200 mAh battery with 15W fast charging ensures all-day endurance in a slim design.
POCO C71’s 120Hz IPS LCD display with TÜV Rheinland Eye Comfort Certification ensures smooth visuals and reduced strain.
POCO C71’s 32MP dual rear and 8MP front cameras with HDR and LED flash deliver vibrant, detailed photos.
POCO C71’s Unisoc T7250 processor with 3–6GB RAM ensures smooth daily performance and efficient multitasking.
ZTE Blade A75
#964
Winner
+9
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T606
RAM:4 GBGB
Storage:256 GBGB
Quick Stats
The ZTE Blade A75’s 5000mAh battery with 22.5W fast charging ensures long-lasting power and quick recharging.
The ZTE Blade A75’s 90Hz LCD IPS display with 2.5D curved glass offers smooth visuals and a modern design.
The ZTE Blade A75’s 50MP main camera pairs with basic secondary and front lenses, ideal for casual photography.
The ZTE Blade A75’s Unisoc T606 processor and 4GB/8GB RAM ensure smooth performance for everyday tasks and light multitasking.
Specifications Comparison
Specification
POCO POCO C71
ZTE ZTE Blade A75
Model
Unisoc Tiger T615 (T7250)
Unisoc Tiger T606
CPU
2 x ARM Cortex, A75 1.8Ghz + 6 x ARM Cortex, A55 1.6Ghz
2x1.6 GHz Cortex, A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex, A55
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12 nm
12 nm
Frequency
1,8 GHz
1,6 GHz
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Mali-G57 MP1
ARM Mali-G57
RAM
3 GB
4 GB
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
N/A
Capacity
64 GB
256 GB
Type
eMMC 5.1 Storage
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
N/A
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
N/A
Yes
Ultrasonic proximity virtual sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
DTS / DTS X, Stereo Speakers
DTS / DTS X
Antutu Score
308681
240000
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 61% of devices
Overall performance better than 57% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
Rankings
Connectivity
POCO C71
#930
Winner
ZTE Blade A75
#995
Design
POCO C71
#926
ZTE Blade A75
#892
Winner
Display
POCO C71
#692
Winner
ZTE Blade A75
#866
Performance
POCO C71
#996
ZTE Blade A75
#991
Winner
Battery
POCO C71
#1002
ZTE Blade A75
#898
Winner
Camera
POCO C71
#995
ZTE Blade A75
#979
Winner
| Metric | POCO C71 | ZTE Blade A75 |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity | #930 Winner | #995 |
| Design | #926 | #892 Winner |
| Display | #692 Winner | #866 |
| Performance | #996 | #991 Winner |
| Battery | #1002 | #898 Winner |
| Camera | #995 | #979 Winner |
Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.
Key Differences
No significant specification differences found between these devices.
Scores by Category
Pros and Cons
POCO C71
Strengths
Long-lasting 5200 mAh battery with 15W fast charging for extended use.
120Hz IPS LCD display with TÜV Rheinland Eye Comfort Certification for smooth visuals and reduced strain.
32MP dual rear camera system with HDR and LED flash for vibrant, detailed photos.
Sleek, lightweight design with 8.3mm thickness, 193g weight, and premium color options.
Balanced performance from Unisoc T7250 (1.8GHz) and Mali-G57 GPU, handling daily tasks smoothly.
Weaknesses
720p HD+ resolution on the 6.9-inch display may feel underwhelming for flagship expectations.
Unisoc T7250 processor, while efficient, lacks flagship-tier power for heavy gaming or multitasking.
Rear camera lacks optical stabilization, potentially affecting low-light or motion photography.
No 5G support, limiting connectivity options for future-proofing.
ZTE Blade A75
Strengths
Large 5000mAh battery with 22.5W fast charging for extended use.
Sleek polycarbonate design with vibrant color options and a 2.5D curved glass display.
90Hz HD+ LCD IPS screen for smooth scrolling and immersive visuals.
Budget-friendly pricing with 4GB/8GB RAM and 128GB/256GB storage variants.
Weaknesses
Mid-tier Unisoc T606 processor may struggle with heavy multitasking or gaming.
Secondary rear camera (0.3MP) and basic front camera (8MP) offer limited photography versatility.
No 5G support in certain regional variants, limiting connectivity options.
Lacks IP rating for water/dust resistance, reducing durability in harsh conditions.
Read Full Reviews
POCO C71
Discover the POCO C71: a budget-friendly phone with a premium design, advanced camera, long-lasting battery, and smooth display. Perfect value for money!
ZTE Blade A75
ZTE Blade A75: A budget-friendly 5G smartphone with a sleek design, vibrant display, and long-lasting battery. Enjoy seamless performance and vibrant visuals for everyday use.
Need help choosing?
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Compare other phones
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Compare phones
VS
VS
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features