POCO F7vsXiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro

POCO F7
#140
Winner
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen4
RAM:12 GBGB
Storage:256 GBGB

Quick Stats

POCO F7's 6500mAh battery offers exceptional endurance and 90W ultra-fast charging for all-day use.
POCO F7’s AMOLED display delivers 120Hz refresh rate, 1700 nits brightness, and HDR10+ for vibrant, immersive visuals in all lighting.
POCO F7’s 50MP main camera delivers sharp daylight shots but struggles with dynamic range and over-sharpening, lacking advanced features.
POCO F7 delivers flagship performance with Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, 12GB RAM, and efficient cooling for smooth multitasking and gaming.
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
#142
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen4
RAM:12 GBGB
Storage:256 GBGB

Quick Stats

The Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro's 7550mAh battery with 90W fast charging and 22.5W reverse charging ensures all-day power and rapid top-ups.
The Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro features a vibrant AMOLED display with 3200-nit brightness, 120Hz refresh rate, and HDR10+ for immersive visuals.
The Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro's 50MP OIS main camera with ultra-wide and 20MP front lens delivers sharp, vibrant, and stable photography.
The Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro delivers flagship performance with Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, 16GB RAM, 1TB UFS 4.1, 6000mm² cooling, and Antutu score of 2.4 million.
Specifications Comparison
Specification
POCO POCO F7
Xiaomi Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
Model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen4
CPU
1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex, X4 + 3x 3 GHz – Cortex, A720 + 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex, A720 + 2x 2.02 GHz – Cortex, A720
1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex, X4 + 3x 3 GHz – Cortex, A720 + 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex, A720 + 2x 2.02 GHz – Cortex, A720
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
4 nm
4 nm
Frequency
4,3 GHz
4,3 GHz
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Adreno 825
Adreno 825
RAM
12 GB
12 GB
Type
RAM LPDDR5X
RAM LPDDR5X
Capacity
256 GB
256 GB
Type
UFS Storage 4.1
UFS Storage 4.1
SD slot
No
No
Fingerprint security
Yes, in screen
Yes, in screen
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Ultrasonic proximity virtual sensor
Yes
Yes
Audio
Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers
Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers
Antutu Score
2084535
2406698
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 96% of devices
Overall performance better than 98% of devices
Cooling system
Yes
Yes
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
6000mm² ultra-large area ice circulation cold pump
6000mm² ultra-large area ice circulation cold pump

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Rankings
Connectivity
POCO F7
#658
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
#696
Design
POCO F7
#154
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
#270
Display
POCO F7
#54
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
#66
Performance
POCO F7
#70
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
#48
Winner
Battery
POCO F7
#241
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
#292
Camera
POCO F7
#767
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro
#770

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Key Differences

No significant specification differences found between these devices.

Scores by Category
Pros and Cons

POCO F7

Strengths

Exceptional battery life with 6500mAh capacity and 90W fast charging for rapid recharging.
Premium build quality with durable glass and aluminum frame, plus IP68 water/dust resistance.
Vibrant AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate, high brightness, and HDR10+ for immersive visuals.
Flagship performance via Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset, 12GB RAM, and efficient thermal management.
Reverse charging and 512GB storage options cater to power users and multitaskers.
Competitive pricing for a device with high-end specs and gaming-optimized features.

Weaknesses

Camera system struggles with dynamic range and over-sharpening in daylight, lacking advanced zoom features.
Absence of expandable storage (no SD card slot) limits flexibility for media-heavy users.
Slightly heavy (216g) and thick (8.2mm) design may not suit all preferences.
Display lacks adaptive refresh rate adjustments, impacting energy efficiency in some scenarios.
Price not specified in source text, potentially testing value expectations for budget-conscious buyers.

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro

Strengths

Flagship Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset with 16GB RAM and 1TB storage for seamless multitasking and gaming.
7550mAh battery with 90W fast charging and 22.5W reverse charging for all-day power and rapid top-ups.
Vibrant 6.8-inch AMOLED display with 3200-nit brightness, 120Hz refresh rate, and HDR10+ for immersive visuals.
Premium aluminum frame, matte glass back, and IP68 water/dust resistance for durable, refined design.
Advanced 50MP main camera with OIS and 8MP ultra-wide lens for sharp photos and 4K/8K video recording.
Competitive pricing for flagship specs, balancing performance, battery, and camera capabilities.

Weaknesses

No microSD slot for expandable storage, limiting flexibility for users needing extra space.
High weight (205–219g) may feel heavy for prolonged single-handed use.
No IP68 rating confirmed in all sources, raising uncertainty about water/dust resistance.
50MP main camera may lack software optimization seen in higher-end competitors.
No 5G support in some regional variants (if applicable), limiting connectivity options.
Potential heat buildup during intensive gaming or multitasking despite cooling system.
Read Full Reviews

POCO F7

Elevate your experience with the POCO F7: premium design, vibrant display, powerful performance, and ultra-fast charging for gamers and multitaskers. Discover seamless innovation in every detail.

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro blends sleek design, vibrant display, and flagship performance. Power through intense tasks, immersive visuals, and all-day battery with rapid charging for an unmatched mobile experience.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features