realme C55vsXiaomi Redmi A3

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

realme
realme C55
C55
Processor:MediaTek Helio G88
RAM:6GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Realme C55's impressive battery life and efficient charging feature make it a standout choice for long-lasting use.
The Realme C55 boasts an impressive 6.72-inch LCD display with a 1080p resolution and 90Hz refresh rate.
The Realme C55's camera performance is more than satisfactory for its price point overall.
The Realme C55's underwhelming performance makes it a mediocre choice for those prioritizing speed and multitasking capabilities.
Xiaomi
Xiaomi Redmi A3
Redmi A3
Processor:Mediatek Helio G36
RAM:3GB
Storage:64GB

Quick Stats

The Xiaomi Redmi A3 boasts exceptional battery life, lasting three days or more with heavy use effortlessly.
The Xiaomi Redmi A3's display offers a reliable and enjoyable viewing experience for its price point effectively.
The Redmi A3's camera is a mixed bag, offering decent quality but poor low-light performance and autofocus issues.
The Xiaomi Redmi A3's performance is its most significant limitation for demanding use cases and gaming.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
realme C55
2 GHz
Xiaomi Redmi A3
2.20 GHz

RAM

Winner
realme C55
6GB
Xiaomi Redmi A3
3GB

Storage

Winner
realme C55
128GB
Xiaomi Redmi A3
64GB

Weight

Winner
realme C55
185g
Xiaomi Redmi A3
199g
Rank
realme C55
Winner
#699
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#806
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
realme C55
#738
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#747
Design
realme C55
#449
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#835
Display
realme C55
#575
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#689
Performance
realme C55
#694
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#821
Battery
realme C55
#564
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#798
Camera
realme C55
#773
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#825
item_phones_categoryId
realme C55
#1
Tie
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
realme realme C55
Xiaomi Xiaomi Redmi A3
Model
MediaTek Helio G88
Mediatek Helio G36
CPU
2x Cortex, A75 2.0 GHz + 6x Cortex, A55 1.8 GHz
8x Cortex, A53 2.2 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12
12
Frequency
2
2.20
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Arm Mali-G52 MC2 1000MHz
IMG PowerVR GE8320 680 MHz
RAM
6
3
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
128
64
Type
N/A
eMMC 5.1 Storage
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
No
Proximity sensor
Yes
N/A
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Ultrasonic proximity virtual sensor
N/A
Yes
Audio
N/A
N/A
Antutu Score
245800
127000
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v9
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 59% of devices
Overall performance better than 51% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

realme C55

Strengths

A large 1080p screen with a 90Hz refresh rate, providing smooth scrolling and swiping.
Good battery life with an endurance rating of 123 hours in our battery tests.
Decently fast charging with 33W supervoque charging, able to charge from zero to fifty percent in half an hour.
A great camera for the price, with a 64MP main Cam and decent low-light photos.
A solid design with a flat back and matte finish, making it look good despite being made of plastic.
An affordable price point, fitting the budget mid-ranger category.

Weaknesses

Poor audio quality when capturing video, with bad sound quality and no video stabilization.
Only one speaker available, which is below average in loudness.
The Dynamic Island feature feels gimmicky and doesn't do much for now, only showing charging status or data limit warnings.
Performance can be slow at times, especially during loading times of games.
No always on display, large folders, or dynamic widgets available due to the LCD screen.
A quiet speaker and poor audio quality when capturing video might turn some people off.

Xiaomi Redmi A3

Strengths

No specific pros listed for this device

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

Read Full Reviews

realme C55

The Realme C55 is a budget-friendly smartphone that's making waves with its Dynamic Island feature, a notch-style cutout turned into a usable interface. This mid-ranger boasts a higher-res display, updated chipset, and improved main camera compared to its predecessor. With a large 5000mAh battery, 90Hz refresh rate, and decent performance, it's an attractive option for those seeking a capable phone on a low budget. But does it live up to the hype?

Xiaomi Redmi A3

The Xiaomi Redmi A3 is a budget-friendly smartphone that offers decent value for its price. The phone's design is modern with clean lines, but the camera bump may not appeal to everyone. The display is nice and the battery life is surprisingly good, lasting up to 3 days on a single charge. Performance-wise, the phone is suitable for casual users who only need it for basic tasks like calls, texts, browsing, and occasional social media use. It can handle some lighter games, but hardcore gaming enthusiasts may want to look elsewhere. The phone's RAM, storage, and processor are pretty basic, making it a no-frills champion. One of the notable improvements is the charging speed, which has been upgraded to 18W fast charging. This allows for faster charging times, making it convenient for users who prioritize battery life. Overall, the Redmi A3 is worth considering if you're on a tight budget and only need a phone for the essentials. However, it's not a powerhouse device that can handle demanding tasks or high-performance games. In summary, this phone gets the job done, but doesn't excel in any particular area. It earns a 6 out of 10 rating, making it a decent value play for those who don't need much from their smartphone.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features