We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Metric | realme Narzo 50i | Samsung Galaxy M02s |
---|---|---|
Connectivity | #850 | #838 Winner |
Design | #828 | #798 Winner |
Display | #781 Winner | #801 |
Performance | #848 Winner | #851 |
Battery | #845 | #835 Winner |
Camera | #855 | #818 Winner |
item_phones_categoryId | #1 Tie | #1 Tie |
Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific cons listed for this device
The Realme Narzo 50i is a budget-friendly smartphone that offers decent performance and features at an affordable price point. Design-wise, it has a polycarbonate back with a textured pattern design that's not too smudge-prone but can attract dirt on oily hands. The camera module is sleek, and the phone lacks a fingerprint scanner. The display is a 6.5-inch IPS LCD screen with a 720p resolution, which is good for indoor use but not ideal for outdoor visibility. It also has a single rear camera, an 8MP shooter that can produce sharp images but struggles in low-light conditions. The front camera is a 5MP sensor that takes decent selfies with vibrant colors. Performance-wise, the phone runs on a UniSOC SC9838 processor paired with 4GB of RAM and 64GB storage, making multitasking and heavy gaming challenging. It also has a large 5000mAh battery that can last up to two days on moderate use, but charging it takes around 2-3 hours. The phone comes with Android 11 skinned with Realme UI Go Edition, which is simpler and easier to navigate than the standard Realme UI. Connectivity options include dual-SIM, 4G LTE, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GPS, and screencast. Priced at around PHP 6,290, the Narzo 50i offers a good balance of performance, features, and price. However, it faces stiff competition from other budget smartphones that offer better performance and cameras for similar prices.
The budget segment was dominated by Xiaomi and Realme in 2020, with Samsung's M Series struggling to keep pace. To rectify this, Samsung released the Galaxy M02s in 2021, priced at a premium of ₹1,000 over its competitors like Poco C3. In this review, we'll explore whether the Galaxy M02s is worth the extra cash or if you should stick with the more affordable Poco C3. The Galaxy M02s boasts a sleek design aesthetic that's ergonomic and comfortable to hold. The dual-tone finish is attractive, and the phone's plastic build doesn't scratch easily. While the camera lenses don't protrude, the overall design quality has improved significantly from Samsung's J Series of old. Both the Poco C3 and Galaxy M02s feature a 6.5-inch LCD screen with an HD+ resolution and a 20:9 aspect ratio. The display quality is similar on both devices, although the Poco C3's Panda Glass protection gives it an edge. Surprisingly, there's little difference in performance between the two phones, despite the Poco C3 having a Helio G35 processor and the Galaxy M02s using a Snapdragon 450. The UI feels slightly faster on the Poco C3 due to animations, but both devices have similar performance in everyday usage. The camera setup is identical on both devices, with a 13MP primary sensor, 2MP macro lens, and 5MP selfie camera. While the images from both phones are comparable, the Poco C3 takes slightly better photos, especially in portrait mode. Both phones have a similar 5000mAh battery life, but the Galaxy M02s has an upper hand with a USB Type-C connection and 15W fast charging support. We recommend getting a 15W fast charger to juice up your phone quickly. Overall, while not perfect, the Galaxy M02s is a decent entry in the budget segment, especially considering Samsung's availability and after-sales services. If you're looking for a reliable option with a premium brand backing, the Galaxy M02s might be worth considering over its competitors.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features