realme X7 Maxvsvivo Y300 Pro

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

realme
realme X7 Max
X7 Max
Processor:MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (MT6893)
RAM:8GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Realme X7 Max offers impressive battery life, lasting over a day and a half with moderate use.
The Realme X7 Max boasts an impressive display with vibrant colors and silky smooth performance for everyday use.
The Realme X7 Max's camera system offers good primary sensor images and decent night mode performance overall.
The Realme X7 Max delivers solid performance, making it an excellent option for those seeking a powerful device.
vivo
vivo Y300 Pro
Y300 Pro
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen1
RAM:8GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Vivo Y300 Pro boasts an exceptional battery life that outperforms competitors with its massive 6,500mAh capacity and fast charging feature.
The Vivo Y300 Pro's display is exceptionally smooth, vibrant, and feature-rich with impressive brightness and color accuracy.
The Vivo Y300 Pro's camera struggles to deliver impressive results, particularly in low-light conditions and depth-of-field.
The Vivo Y300 Pro boasts impressive performance, handling demanding tasks with ease and efficiency.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
realme X7 Max
3 GHz
vivo Y300 Pro
2.20 GHz

RAM

Tie
realme X7 Max
8GB
vivo Y300 Pro
8GB

Storage

Tie
realme X7 Max
128GB
vivo Y300 Pro
128GB

Weight

Winner
realme X7 Max
179g
vivo Y300 Pro
194g
Rank
realme X7 Max
Winner
#306
vivo Y300 Pro
#385
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
realme X7 Max
#17
Winner
vivo Y300 Pro
#219
Design
realme X7 Max
#343
Winner
vivo Y300 Pro
#459
Display
realme X7 Max
#136
Winner
vivo Y300 Pro
#165
Performance
realme X7 Max
#299
Winner
vivo Y300 Pro
#406
Battery
realme X7 Max
#469
vivo Y300 Pro
#102
Winner
Camera
realme X7 Max
#357
Winner
vivo Y300 Pro
#641
item_phones_categoryId
realme X7 Max
#1
Tie
vivo Y300 Pro
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
realme realme X7 Max
vivo vivo Y300 Pro
Model
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (MT6893)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen1
CPU
1x Cortex, A78 3.0 GHz + 3x Cortex, A78 2.6 GHz + 4x Cortex, A55 2.0 GHz
4x2.2GHz Cortex A78 + 4x1.80GHz Cortex A55
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
6
4
Frequency
3
2.20
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
9x Arm Mali-G77 MC9 886MHz
Adreno 710
RAM
8
8
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
128
128
Type
UFS Storage 3.1
UFS Storage 2.2
SD slot
No
No
Fingerprint security
Yes, in screen
Yes, in screen
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
N/A
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Gravity sensor
N/A
Yes
Geomagnetic sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones
N/A
Antutu Score
711664
575000
Antutu Version
Antutu v9
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 80% of devices
Overall performance better than 77% of devices
Cooling system
Yes
Yes
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
4D tactil engine linear motor
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

realme X7 Max

Strengths

The Realme X7 Max has a nice looking design with a glossy stripe accent and shiny logo.
It features a great AMOLED screen with a fast 120Hz refresh rate, making swiping and scrolling extra smooth.
The phone has good battery life, scoring a good endurance rating of 110 hours in our proprietary tests.
It supports 50W Super Dart charging, which is still quite solid, although slower than the Realme GT's 65W charging.
The camera performance is decent, with solid 16MP photos from the main cam and nice detail and colors.
The phone has a traditional headphone jack and hybrid stereo speakers that earned a rating of 'very good' on our loudness charts.
It features an under-display fingerprint reader that's fast and responsive.

Weaknesses

The design is not flashy, but rather catchy, which might be a subjective preference.
The phone has a mediatek Dimensity 1200 5G chipset, which doesn't quite reach the high benchmark scores of the GT, although performance is still flagship-grade.
Games run great, but lack of high FPS support and thermal issues might be a concern for heavy gamers.
The ultra-wide camera takes average-quality photos with different color rendition from the main cam.
Macro shots are decent but require manual focusing due to lack of autofocus.

vivo Y300 Pro

Strengths

Long-lasting battery life
Fast charging capabilities
Powerful processor
Good display quality
IP65 waterproof rating
Good camera performance
Affordable price

Weaknesses

Large size
Below-average camera quality
Limited color options
Read Full Reviews

realme X7 Max

The Realme X7 Max is an alternative to the popular Realme GT, specifically designed for the Indian market and globally sold as the Realme GT Neo. The phone has a high-end MediaTek chipset, replacing the Snapdragon 888 in the original GT model. Design-wise, the X7 Max has a glossy stripe accent and shiny logo, giving it a rather catchy look. The phone's build is made from plastic, not glass, but still feels premium and on the lighter side. The display is a 6.43-inch AMOLED with a 1080p resolution, fast 120Hz refresh rate, and punch-hole selfie camera. The display itself is really nice, sharp, and contrasty, with vivid colors that can be made accurate with color settings. The phone's audio features a traditional headphone jack and hybrid stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support. In terms of performance, the X7 Max has a MediaTek Dimensity 1200 5G chipset, which provides flagship-grade performance comparable to Snapdragon 860 or 870 chipsets. Battery life is also good, with a 4500mAh battery that supports 50W Super Dart charging. The camera setup is identical to the Realme GT, with a 64MP main cam, 8MP ultra-wide camera, and 2MP macro cam. While not flagship-grade, the cameras are decent for the class, producing good quality photos and videos. Overall, the Realme X7 Max offers a great user experience, similar to the Realme GT, but at a potentially lower price point. If you can find it, it's definitely worth considering as a more affordable alternative to the flagship model.

vivo Y300 Pro

The Vivo Y300 Pro stands out with its massive 6,500mAh battery, making it an attractive option for those seeking long-lasting power without added bulk. Despite its large capacity, the phone's thickness and weight are comparable to regular flagship devices, thanks to Vivo's innovative battery packaging and reduced motherboard size. In our testing, the phone performed exceptionally well, lasting 5 hours in a heavy endurance test with minimal battery drop. Video watching consumed just 4% of the battery, allowing for up to 20 hours of continuous playback. Gaming performance was also impressive, with Honor of Kings playable at 90 FPS for up to 11 hours. The Vivo Y300 Pro supports fast charging, reaching 100% in just 48 minutes. Its battery can be charged up to 1,700 times and still retain over 80% capacity. The phone's design is sleek, with a 6.7-inch OLED display featuring rounded corners and a slight curve for comfortable handling. The Y300 Pro also boasts an IR remote control and IP65 waterproof rating, making it practical for everyday use. With up to 12GB of RAM and 512GB storage, the phone performs well in daily tasks and can handle demanding games like Honor of Kings at 90 FPS. However, camera quality is below average, with no optical image stabilization. The Vivo Y300 Pro starts at CNY 799 (around $253 USD) for its base variant with 8GB RAM and 128GB storage. This phone is ideal for those prioritizing battery life, multimedia use, and casual gaming. While it may have some drawbacks, the Y300 Pro's impressive battery performance makes it a compelling option for those seeking a long-lasting device without added bulk.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features