Samsung A03 CorevsUlefone Power Armor 14

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Samsung
Samsung A03 Core
A03 Core
Processor:Spreadtrum Unisoc SC9863A
RAM:2GB
Storage:32GB

Quick Stats

The Samsung A03 Core series offers up to two days of normal usage battery life, a crucial aspect to consider.
The Samsung A03 Core's display is decent but not the best, lacking detail and clarity.
The Samsung A03 Core's single-lens camera setup delivers mediocre image quality with notable color accuracy issues.
The Samsung A03 Core's performance is decent for basic tasks but limited by its quad-core processor and 3GB RAM.
Ulefone
Ulefone Power Armor 14
Power Armor 14
Processor:MediaTek Helio G35 (MT6765V/WB)
RAM:4GB
Storage:64GB

Quick Stats

The Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro boasts an impressive battery life, delivering over 15 hours of screen time on one charge.
The Ulefone Power Armor 14's display is a major letdown with poor brightness and resolution issues overall.
The most notable takeaway is that the camera performance of the Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro is somewhat disappointing overall.
The Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro's underwhelming performance is its most significant and disappointing aspect altogether unfortunately.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
Samsung A03 Core
1.60 GHz
Ulefone Power Armor 14
2.30 GHz

RAM

Winner
Samsung A03 Core
2GB
Ulefone Power Armor 14
4GB

Storage

Winner
Samsung A03 Core
32GB
Ulefone Power Armor 14
64GB

Weight

Winner
Samsung A03 Core
195g
Ulefone Power Armor 14
358g
Rank
Samsung A03 Core
#855
Ulefone Power Armor 14
Winner
#750
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
Samsung A03 Core
#851
Ulefone Power Armor 14
#698
Winner
Design
Samsung A03 Core
#852
Ulefone Power Armor 14
#372
Winner
Display
Samsung A03 Core
#794
Winner
Ulefone Power Armor 14
#808
Performance
Samsung A03 Core
#849
Ulefone Power Armor 14
#797
Winner
Battery
Samsung A03 Core
#846
Ulefone Power Armor 14
#788
Winner
Camera
Samsung A03 Core
#857
Ulefone Power Armor 14
#639
Winner
item_phones_categoryId
Samsung A03 Core
#1
Tie
Ulefone Power Armor 14
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
Samsung Samsung A03 Core
Ulefone Ulefone Power Armor 14
Model
Spreadtrum Unisoc SC9863A
MediaTek Helio G35 (MT6765V/WB)
CPU
4x Cortex, A55 1.6 GHz + 4x Cortex, A55 1.2 GHz
4x2.3 GHz Cortex, A53 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex, A53
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
28
12
Frequency
1.60
2.30
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
PowerVR GE8322
IMG PowerVR GE8320
RAM
2
4
Type
N/A
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
32
64
Type
eMMC 5.1 Storage
N/A
Fingerprint security
No
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
No
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
N/A
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
N/A
Yes
Audio
N/A
N/A
Antutu Score
112312
110000
Antutu Version
Antutu v9
Antutu v8
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 49% of devices
Overall performance better than 49% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Samsung A03 Core

Strengths

It's not bad for $100 or less, considering you get so much more phone with the regular A03 or A03S
Has a decent selfie camera that captures a solid picture, although color accuracy could be improved
The display is decent, and you won't find it too shabby for its price class
It's perfect if all you need to do is take random pictures without much concern about the result
If budget is your main constraint and you're looking for the cheapest option among Samsung's A-series phones, the A03 Core might just fit the bill
Has enough battery life to last a day, especially considering its limited features

Weaknesses

The camera capabilities are severely lacking compared to the regular A03 or A03S models, with much lower megapixel count and fewer shooting modes
The display quality could be better, although it's decent for its price class
No fingerprint sensor, which might be a drawback for some users
It lacks any form of portrait mode or depth effect in selfie shots
Compared to the regular A03 or A03S, you'll get much less phone with $50 more spent on either model
The Android Go experience can be clunky at times, especially if you're used to the full-fledged A-series experience

Ulefone Power Armor 14

Strengths

No specific pros listed for this device

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

Read Full Reviews

Samsung A03 Core

The Samsung A03 Core is the most budget-friendly option among the three variants, but its limitations are evident. It features a single 8MP rear camera, a 5MP front camera, and a minimalist camera app with limited features. In contrast, the regular A03 and A03s offer more impressive camera capabilities, including dual or triple lens setups, respectively. The latter two also come with additional features like portrait mode, night mode, and hyperlapse. While the A03 Core's selfie lens produced natural-looking results, its rear camera struggled to capture detailed images. When it comes to battery life, all three devices offer similar performance, lasting around two days under normal usage. However, the A03 Core with Android Go and limited app selection may provide slightly better battery efficiency. The regular A03 and A03s share a similar design, with the latter featuring a USB-C port, whereas the former retains the micro-USB port. The A03s also boasts an additional fingerprint sensor. In terms of specifications, the regular A03 outperforms the A03s in almost every aspect, except for its charging standard. Ultimately, the Samsung A03 Core is suitable for those on a tight budget who want a basic smartphone experience. However, for $50-100 more, users can upgrade to the regular A03 or A03s, which offer significantly better cameras and overall performance. The decision ultimately comes down to individual needs and preferences. The Samsung A03 series has become increasingly confusing due to its varied specifications and regional availability. As a result, potential buyers may find it challenging to make an informed decision.

Ulefone Power Armor 14

The Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro is a rugged smartphone designed for those who value durability over style. While the phone's IP69K rating makes it waterproof, I have my doubts about its shockproof claims, as the screen is still covered with glass and can shatter on impact. One of the standout features of this device is its massive 10,000mAh battery, which provides over 15 hours of screen time on a single charge. However, pairing this with the Mediatek Helio G85 processor results in a relatively slow performance experience. The phone's Android 12 operating system and 6GB of RAM help keep everyday apps running smoothly, but don't expect to edit videos or play demanding games. The camera setup is underwhelming, with two cameras (including one for portrait mode) offering average quality images and no image stabilization in video recording. While the phone can capture decent photos, it's not a strong selling point for this device. In terms of design, the Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro has a bulky build with rubberized corners, metal sides, and a plastic/rubber back. It's functional but unremarkable in terms of aesthetics. The phone's speakers are another area where the Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro falls short, offering average sound quality that can be easily muffled by holding the device in your hand. While not expensive, this phone is outperformed by more affordable options from brands like Xiaomi and Poco. The only redeeming feature of the Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro is its massive battery life, which may appeal to those who need a phone that can last for days on a single charge. However, all things considered, there are better choices available in this price range.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features