We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific cons listed for this device
The Samsung Galaxy A02 is a budget-friendly smartphone that fails to deliver on its promises. Despite having a quad-core Mediatek processor and 3GB of RAM, the phone's performance is sluggish, making everyday tasks like web browsing and app usage frustrating experiences. The phone's camera, display, and battery life are average at best, but it's the poor performance that really stands out as a major issue. Even simple tasks like loading apps or browsing the web become long-winded processes, making it feel like a chore to use the phone. What's even more puzzling is that when you do finally manage to get into a game, it runs surprisingly smoothly. It's a strange paradox where the phone can handle demanding games but struggles with everyday tasks. This inconsistency makes no sense and only adds to the overall frustration of using this device. In terms of specifications, the phone has a 4-year-old quad-core Mediatek processor and either 2 or 3GB of RAM, which is not impressive compared to other devices in its price range. The Geekbench scores are also underwhelming, putting it at the bottom of the list among recent phones. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A02 feels like a phone that's been left behind by time and technology. Even considering its low price point, it's hard to recommend this device when there are better options available for the same or slightly higher cost. The a02s and a12, both more expensive than the A02 but still budget-friendly, offer far superior performance, cameras, and features. Unless Samsung releases some significant software updates in the near future, it's best to avoid the Galaxy A02 altogether. Instead, consider one of its better siblings or other devices from different manufacturers that can provide a much smoother and more enjoyable user experience.
The Samsung Galaxy F13 is a budget smartphone that competes in a crowded market with intense rivalry from other brands. Its design language is unmistakably Samsung, but the phone's plastic build and chunky size may be off-putting to some. The rear panel has a nice texture, making it easier to hold, while the front features a dewdrop notch and thick chin. The phone's 6.6-inch LCD display with full HD resolution and 60Hz refresh rate is a significant improvement over its predecessor, the F12. While the peak brightness is underwhelming, the colors and viewing angles are good. The device is powered by Samsung's Exynos 850 chipset, which may not be the strongest performer in this segment but handles occasional gaming fine. The camera setup includes a 50-megapixel primary sensor, 5-megapixel ultra-wide snapper, and 2-megapixel depth sensor. While the dynamic range is limited, photos are good enough for social media posts. The phone also features an 8-megapixel selfie camera with decent results but no autofocus. One of the standout features of the Galaxy F13 is its large 6000mAh battery, which provides easily two days of battery life even with heavy usage. While charging takes a bit over two hours, the phone's great battery life more than makes up for it. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy F13 is a solid budget smartphone with impressive battery life and an ad-free UI. Its onboard ultra-wide-angle camera is also a plus, making it a good buy for those on a tight budget.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features