We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Metric | Samsung Galaxy A04s | Ulefone Power Armor 14 |
---|---|---|
Connectivity | #679 Winner | #698 |
Design | #786 | #372 Winner |
Display | #791 Winner | #808 |
Performance | #818 | #797 Winner |
Battery | #709 Winner | #788 |
Camera | #587 Winner | #639 |
item_phones_categoryId | #1 Tie | #1 Tie |
Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
The Samsung Galaxy A04s is an entry-level phone that attempts to balance budget-friendly specs with desirable features. As the lowest-tier model offered by Samsung this year, the A04s doesn't impress with its specs, but it does offer a large 5,000mAh battery, which provides good battery life. The phone's design is plastic and glossy on the back, making it prone to fingerprints. The 6.5-inch LCD screen has a 720p resolution and a teardrop-shaped notch, with a welcome 90Hz refresh rate that can be dialed down to 60Hz to save energy. However, the display's resolution gives away its budget nature, and brightness is mediocre at best. The camera setup consists of three cameras, but only the 50-megapixel main cam is truly useful. The macro camera delivers subpar results, while low-light photos from the main camera are decent considering the phone's price. Selfies are also average. Under the hood, the A04s packs an Exynos 850 chipset, which struggles to run smoothly with Samsung's feature-packed interface, One UI Core. The phone often experiences slowdowns and stutters even during basic tasks. The Galaxy A04s is an okay phone considering its price point. It offers a high refresh rate on the display, solid battery life, and decent camera performance. However, the software struggles to run smoothly due to the low-power chipset, making it a phone that feels like a compromise between budget and features. Overall, it's a decent option for those who want a feature-packed phone at an affordable price, but there are better options available in this class.
The Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro is a rugged smartphone designed for those who value durability over style. While the phone's IP69K rating makes it waterproof, I have my doubts about its shockproof claims, as the screen is still covered with glass and can shatter on impact. One of the standout features of this device is its massive 10,000mAh battery, which provides over 15 hours of screen time on a single charge. However, pairing this with the Mediatek Helio G85 processor results in a relatively slow performance experience. The phone's Android 12 operating system and 6GB of RAM help keep everyday apps running smoothly, but don't expect to edit videos or play demanding games. The camera setup is underwhelming, with two cameras (including one for portrait mode) offering average quality images and no image stabilization in video recording. While the phone can capture decent photos, it's not a strong selling point for this device. In terms of design, the Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro has a bulky build with rubberized corners, metal sides, and a plastic/rubber back. It's functional but unremarkable in terms of aesthetics. The phone's speakers are another area where the Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro falls short, offering average sound quality that can be easily muffled by holding the device in your hand. While not expensive, this phone is outperformed by more affordable options from brands like Xiaomi and Poco. The only redeeming feature of the Ulefone Power Armor 14 Pro is its massive battery life, which may appeal to those who need a phone that can last for days on a single charge. However, all things considered, there are better choices available in this price range.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features