Samsung Galaxy A06vsSamsung Galaxy F12

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A06
Galaxy A06
Processor:MediaTek Helio G85 (MT6769V/CZ)
RAM:4GB
Storage:64GB

Quick Stats

The Samsung Galaxy A06 boasts an impressive 13 hours and 50 minutes of active use battery life.
The Samsung Galaxy A06's display is adequate but lacks advanced features and vibrancy expected at its price point.
The most important takeaway is that the Galaxy A06's camera performance is disappointing and falls short of expectations significantly.
The Samsung Galaxy A06's poor performance makes it unsuitable for demanding tasks and high-performance expectations.
Samsung
Samsung Galaxy F12
Galaxy F12
Processor:Samsung Exynos 850
RAM:4GB
Storage:64GB

Quick Stats

The Galaxy F12's battery life is decent, but falls short of expectations due to sluggish charging times.
The Samsung Galaxy F12's display boasts a 90Hz refresh rate, making for a smooth viewing experience overall.
The Samsung Galaxy F12's camera setup delivers decent results, but lacks video stabilization and has limited resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy F12 delivers impressive performance, handling everyday tasks with ease and minimal lag overall.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Tie
Samsung Galaxy A06
2 GHz
Samsung Galaxy F12
2 GHz

RAM

Tie
Samsung Galaxy A06
4GB
Samsung Galaxy F12
4GB

Storage

Tie
Samsung Galaxy A06
64GB
Samsung Galaxy F12
64GB

Weight

Winner
Samsung Galaxy A06
189g
Samsung Galaxy F12
221g
Specifications Comparison
Specification
Samsung Samsung Galaxy A06
Samsung Samsung Galaxy F12
Model
MediaTek Helio G85 (MT6769V/CZ)
Samsung Exynos 850
CPU
2x Cortex, A75 2.0 GHz + 6x Cortex, A55 1.8 GHz
4x Cortex, A55 2.0 GHz + 4x Cortex, A55 2.0 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12
8
Frequency
2
2
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Arm Mali-G52 MC2 950MHz
ARM Mali-G52
RAM
4
4
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
64
64
Type
eMMC 5.1 Storage
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
No
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Audio
N/A
Dolby Atmos
Antutu Score
225154
117300
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v8
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 57% of devices
Overall performance better than 50% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Samsung Galaxy A06

Strengths

No specific pros listed for this device

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

Samsung Galaxy F12

Strengths

No specific pros listed for this device

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

Read Full Reviews

Samsung Galaxy A06

The Samsung Galaxy A06 is the most affordable device in the A series lineup, offering a basic but reliable smartphone experience. The phone's design is straightforward with rounded corners and a plastic back and frame. Despite being made from plastic, the device feels solid and not cheap or flimsy. The display is a 6.7-inch LCD with 720p resolution and a 60Hz refresh rate. While it gets bright enough for indoor use, it's not ideal for outdoor use on sunny days. The pixel density of 262 PPI is lower than more expensive phones, making it less sharp and less contrasty than OLED displays. The phone has a single bottom-firing speaker that performed well in loudness tests but lacked bass and had some distortion at higher volumes. There's also an 8MP front-facing camera for selfies, which are soft and have off-colors. Under the hood is the MediaTek Helio G85 chipset, which is not powerful and doesn't support 5G connectivity. The phone's performance was sluggish in benchmarks, and even routine tasks sometimes stuttered or lagged. However, the battery life was good with a 13 hour 50 minute active use score. The camera setup is basic with a single 12.5MP rear camera that struggles with contrast and dynamic range. Low-light photos are noisy, and there's no video stabilization. The interface is Samsung's One UI 6.1 on top of Android 14, which provides most features from more expensive Samsung devices but lacks fancy AI features. Overall, the Galaxy A06 is a budget phone that offers a basic smartphone experience at an affordable price. While it may not be ideal for gaming or demanding tasks, it could work as a backup phone or for those on a tight budget. However, there are better options available in the market.

Samsung Galaxy F12

The Samsung Galaxy F12 is a new budget smartphone that starts from ₹10,999. It boasts a unique textured back with a wave-like pattern, setting it apart from other smartphones in its price range. The device features a 6.5-inch HD+ 90Hz LCD display, which provides punchy colors and a sharp viewing experience. The rear camera setup consists of a 48MP primary sensor, 5MP ultra-wide sensor, 2MP depth sensor, and 2MP macro sensor, offering versatility in capturing various scenes. However, there's no video stabilization, and video recording is limited to 1080p at 30fps. The phone runs on the Exynos 850 chipset with 4GB RAM and 128GB storage, providing a smooth performance. It also features a side-mounted fingerprint scanner, USB Type-C port, and a headphone jack. The device ships with Android 11 and One UI Core 3.1, which is expected to receive updates for a longer period. The Galaxy F12's battery is a 6000mAh unit that should provide a long-lasting experience. However, it only supports 15W charging, which takes around three hours to fully charge the device. Despite this, the phone's pricing seems competitive, and Samsung has done a decent job of packing in features without breaking the bank. Overall, the Galaxy F12 appears to be another solid addition to Samsung's lineup of budget smartphones, offering a feature-rich experience at an affordable price point.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features