Samsung Galaxy A13vsZTE Blade A53 Pro

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A13
Galaxy A13
Processor:MediaTek Helio G80 (MT6769T)
RAM:3GB
Storage:32GB

Quick Stats

The Samsung Galaxy A13's impressive battery life and efficient power consumption are its standout features.
The Samsung Galaxy A13's display has a mixed bag of qualities, with some notable shortcomings and limitations.
The Samsung Galaxy A13's camera performance is a decent effort, but struggles with low-light and ultrawide capabilities.
The Samsung Galaxy A13's subpar performance is its major downfall, making it a disappointing budget-friendly option.
ZTE
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
Blade A53 Pro
Processor:Spreadtrum Unisoc SC9863A
RAM:4GB
Storage:64GB

Quick Stats

The ZTE Blade A53 Pro's battery life is underwhelming, even by budget phone standards, and a significant letdown.
The ZTE Blade A53 Pro's subpar display is its major downfall and main drawback overall.
The ZTE Blade A53 Pro's camera system is a major disappointment with poor image quality overall.
The ZTE Blade A53 Pro's underwhelming performance makes it a poor choice for seamless smartphone experiences overall.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
Samsung Galaxy A13
2 GHz
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
1.60 GHz

RAM

Winner
Samsung Galaxy A13
3GB
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
4GB

Storage

Winner
Samsung Galaxy A13
32GB
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
64GB

Weight

Winner
Samsung Galaxy A13
195g
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
198g
Rank
Samsung Galaxy A13
Winner
#711
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#850
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
Samsung Galaxy A13
#639
Winner
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#858
Design
Samsung Galaxy A13
#654
Winner
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#839
Display
Samsung Galaxy A13
#732
Winner
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#838
Performance
Samsung Galaxy A13
#790
Winner
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#839
Battery
Samsung Galaxy A13
#713
Winner
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#853
Camera
Samsung Galaxy A13
#418
Winner
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#824
item_phones_categoryId
Samsung Galaxy A13
#1
Tie
ZTE Blade A53 Pro
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
Samsung Samsung Galaxy A13
ZTE ZTE Blade A53 Pro
Model
MediaTek Helio G80 (MT6769T)
Spreadtrum Unisoc SC9863A
CPU
2x Cortex, A75 2.0 GHz + 6x Cortex, A55 1.8 GHz
4x Cortex, A55 1.6 GHz + 4x Cortex, A55 1.2 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12
28
Frequency
2
1.60
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
ARM Mali-G52 2EEMC2
PowerVR GE8322
RAM
3
4
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4 RAM
Capacity
32
64
Type
eMMC 5.1 Storage
eMMC 5.1 Storage
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, in the back
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
No
Proximity sensor
N/A
Yes
Light sensor
N/A
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
N/A
Geomagnetic sensor
Yes
N/A
Ultrasonic proximity virtual sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
N/A
N/A
Antutu Score
200150
112000
Antutu Version
Antutu v8
Antutu v9
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 55% of devices
Overall performance better than 49% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Samsung Galaxy A13

Strengths

The Galaxy A13 has a good battery life, with a 5000 mAh battery that scored a 114 hour endurance rating.
The cameras on the A13 do a pretty good job too, especially for a budget phone. The main cam's photos come out at 12.5MP and are solid, with plenty of resolved detail and good sharpness.
The selfie camera is also good, with plenty of detail and nicely rendered colors.
The Galaxy A13 runs One ui 4.1 core, which provides most of the features you'd get on the higher end Samsung devices.

Weaknesses

The phone struggles in CPU tests and is particularly underpowered in the GPU department, making it slow to use even for basic tasks.
The display has a sluggish pixel response and ghosting and smearing when swiping around, which can be frustrating.
The Exynos 850 chipset is not impressive and sits at the bottom of the charts, even in this budget class.

ZTE Blade A53 Pro

Strengths

The phone comes with a screen protector, which is a nice surprise.
It has 4GB of RAM and 64GB of storage, although some of it may be reserved for system use.
The device has a dual camera setup, even if the cameras are not impressive
The phone's price is relatively low at $150.
It comes with a SIM tool and a charger

Weaknesses

The packaging is cheap and flimsy.
The charging port is micro USB, which is outdated and a major inconvenience.
The cameras are not impressive, especially the 2MP sensor
The display has a low resolution of 720p and no high refresh rate
The processor is weak and not powerful enough to handle demanding tasks
Read Full Reviews

Samsung Galaxy A13

The Samsung Galaxy A13 is a budget-friendly smartphone that aims to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank. However, despite its affordable price, this device falls short in several areas. The phone's glossy plastic unibody feels far from premium and lacks grip. The fingerprint reader is fast and responsive, but the timeout between unlocks can be frustrating. The 6.6-inch PLS LCD display has a 1080p resolution and standard 60Hz refresh rate, making movement less smooth compared to more premium phones. Performance-wise, the Exynos 850 chipset is underwhelming, particularly in GPU-intensive tasks. The phone lags and stutters when performing basic tasks, including navigating the homescreen. The lack of an ambient light sensor results in auto brightness being unresponsive. The cameras are decent for a budget phone, with a 50MP main cam producing solid photos, especially for a low price point. However, the ultrawide camera struggles in low-light conditions, and there's no night mode to help improve image quality. Despite its shortcomings, the Galaxy A13 has some redeeming qualities, such as good battery life (114 hours endurance rating) and decent storage options (expandable via microSD cards). Unfortunately, the phone's overall performance issues make it less desirable compared to other budget-friendly alternatives.

ZTE Blade A53 Pro

The ZTE Blade A53 Pro - a budget smartphone that falls short on several fronts. With a subpar display resolution, outdated micro USB charging port, and questionable camera setup, this device struggles to justify its $150 price tag. Add to that a weak processor, limited storage, and no NFC or 5G capabilities, and you're left with a phone that feels like a major compromise. Can it still be considered a budget option, or is it simply not worth the money?

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features