We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
The Samsung Galaxy A16 4G is a budget-friendly mid-ranger that offers a large screen, solid camera, and plenty of software support. While it shares many similarities with the 5G model, the 4G version has a different chipset and lower price tag. One of the standout features of the A16 4G is its display, which measures 6.7 inches and boasts an OLED panel with a 90Hz refresh rate. The screen is sharp and contrasty, but lacks HDR video support. The phone also features IP54 water splash protection and a side-mounted fingerprint reader. The A16 4G's camera setup includes a 50MP main sensor, 5MP ultra-wide lens, and 2MP macro cam. While the primary camera captures decent photos with natural colors and good detail, it struggles in low light conditions. The ultra-wide and macro cameras are also underwhelming, particularly in low-light scenarios. The phone's performance is powered by a MediaTek Helio G99 chipset, which results in average benchmark scores but smooth everyday use. Battery life is impressive, with an active use score of 14 hours and 43 minutes. Charging speeds are also commendable, reaching up to 25W. While the A16 4G has its strengths, it's not without its weaknesses. The phone lacks electronic video stabilization, which can result in shaky videos. Additionally, the camera performance is inconsistent, particularly when compared to other Samsung offerings. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G is a solid mid-ranger that offers a high refresh rate OLED display and decent camera capabilities at an affordable price. However, it may not be the best choice for those who value exceptional camera performance or electronic video stabilization.
The Ulefone Armor 27T Pro is a rugged powerhouse that builds upon its predecessor's design cues from the Doogee V20 Pro. The phone's tank-like build makes it resistant to dust and water, with IP68/IP69K certification and MIL-STD-810G standards ensuring it can withstand rough handling. The 6.78-inch IPS LCD display has a 120Hz refresh rate but lacks AMOLED brightness. While decent for general use, 4K content is downscaled to 1080p. The phone's audio capabilities are limited to a single bottom speaker, which may not be sufficient for media or gaming enthusiasts. The camera setup consists of a 50MP main sensor, 64MP night vision camera, and 32MP front camera. While good for casual shots, low-light performance requires a steady hand. The night vision camera is particularly useful, allowing up to 20 meters visibility in complete darkness with infrared lighting. The thermal imaging feature, which uses a FLIR sensor, operates at a lower 9Hz refresh rate compared to the predecessor's 25Hz. While this results in more accurate temperature readings, it may not provide the smoothest video experience. The phone's battery is large, with a 10,600mAh capacity that can last 4-5 days of heavy use or weeks on light usage. The MediaTek Dimensity 6300 chip provides decent performance for everyday tasks but feels dated for more demanding activities like gaming. With 12GB RAM and 256GB storage (expandable to 2TB via microSD), the phone's real-world performance is solid, although not ideal for heavy apps or games at max settings. Overall, the Ulefone Armor 27T Pro excels in its thermal imaging accuracy, rugged durability, and long-lasting battery. Its price point of around $300 makes it a great value if you prioritize these features over top-tier gaming performance.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features