We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a mid-range phone that offers a range of features despite its budget nature. The device has a sleek design with a flat plastic back and a glossy finish, similar to the more expensive A series models. It features a 6.7-inch AMOLED display with a 1080p resolution and a 90Hz refresh rate, which provides a smooth user experience. The phone also boasts IP54-rated splash protection, a larger display than its predecessor, and improved battery life. However, it lacks some premium features like HDR video support, stereo speakers, and a headphone jack. The camera system is identical to the previous model, with a 50MP main camera, 5MP ultra-wide camera, and 2MP macro camera. In terms of performance, the Galaxy A16 5G uses either Samsung's Exynos 1330 or MediaTek Dimensity 6300 chipsets, depending on the market. While it holds its own in CPU benchmarks, it lags behind other mid-range devices in graphics tests. The phone also has 4GB or 8GB of RAM and a 5,000mAh battery with up to 25W fast charging. The camera system delivers solid results for photos and videos, especially in bright conditions. However, the ultra-wide camera struggles in low light, and the macro camera is only average. The phone also offers six years of software support, which is a significant upgrade from previous models. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a decent budget phone with some notable features, but its performance and battery life are not as impressive as other mid-range devices. While it may be worth considering at a discounted price, there are better options within the same price range.
The Ulefone Armor 27T Pro is a rugged powerhouse that builds upon its predecessor's design cues from the Doogee V20 Pro. The phone's tank-like build makes it resistant to dust and water, with IP68/IP69K certification and MIL-STD-810G standards ensuring it can withstand rough handling. The 6.78-inch IPS LCD display has a 120Hz refresh rate but lacks AMOLED brightness. While decent for general use, 4K content is downscaled to 1080p. The phone's audio capabilities are limited to a single bottom speaker, which may not be sufficient for media or gaming enthusiasts. The camera setup consists of a 50MP main sensor, 64MP night vision camera, and 32MP front camera. While good for casual shots, low-light performance requires a steady hand. The night vision camera is particularly useful, allowing up to 20 meters visibility in complete darkness with infrared lighting. The thermal imaging feature, which uses a FLIR sensor, operates at a lower 9Hz refresh rate compared to the predecessor's 25Hz. While this results in more accurate temperature readings, it may not provide the smoothest video experience. The phone's battery is large, with a 10,600mAh capacity that can last 4-5 days of heavy use or weeks on light usage. The MediaTek Dimensity 6300 chip provides decent performance for everyday tasks but feels dated for more demanding activities like gaming. With 12GB RAM and 256GB storage (expandable to 2TB via microSD), the phone's real-world performance is solid, although not ideal for heavy apps or games at max settings. Overall, the Ulefone Armor 27T Pro excels in its thermal imaging accuracy, rugged durability, and long-lasting battery. Its price point of around $300 makes it a great value if you prioritize these features over top-tier gaming performance.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features