We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific cons listed for this device
The Samsung Galaxy A22 4G is a solid budget smartphone that offers a lot for its price. The device features an AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate, which provides a smooth and vibrant visual experience. However, the lower resolution of the display might be a drawback for some users. In terms of performance, the A22 is powered by a quad-camera setup, including a 48MP primary sensor, 8MP ultra-wide lens, 2MP macro sensor, and 2MP depth sensor. The camera capabilities are impressive, with great low-light performance, night mode shots that rival those taken in broad daylight, and a punchy color tone. The added OIS feature also helps to minimize shaky footage. Battery life is another strong point of the A22, with a massive 5,000mAh battery that can last up to two days on a single charge. However, charging speeds are limited to 15W, which takes around two hours to fully charge the device from zero percent. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A22 4G is a great affordable smartphone option for those looking for a reliable device with good camera capabilities and long battery life. While it may not offer the latest features or top-of-the-line specs, it's a solid choice for budget-conscious buyers who want a good all-around experience.
The Vivo Y21 is a budget-friendly smartphone designed to compete in the upper budget segment. Priced at KSh 16,999, this device boasts an affordable tag while packing some impressive features. Design-wise, the phone has a sleek diamond glow texture that's sure to turn heads. The well-positioned volume buttons and USB-C port are also notable features. Vivo opted for a side-mounted fingerprint sensor instead of an in-display one, which works efficiently. The 6.51-inch Halo LCD display with 1600x720 pixels resolution is not high-refresh-rate enabled, but it still provides a pleasant multimedia experience. The phone's performance is backed by a Mediatek Helio P35 processor paired with 4GB RAM and 64GB storage, expandable to 1GB. While the device handles light to medium tasks without any issues, gaming performance takes a hit. Playing graphic-intensive games like Call of Duty requires medium settings, which might deter some users. However, the phone's battery longevity is noteworthy. The 5000mAh battery delivers up to two days of use on a single charge, with charging speeds that top off from 0-70% in just 52 minutes using an 18W charger. The camera setup features three sensors - an 8MP selfie camera and a 13MP dual main camera with a 2MP macro sensor. While not the best camera performer, it's still a commendable feature set for its price bracket. Overall, the Vivo Y21 is a solid budget offering that's worth considering, especially given its excellent battery life, satisfactory performance, and value-for-money pricing.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features