Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsUlefone Power Armor 13

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Galaxy A32 5G
Processor:MediaTek Dimensity 720 (MT6853V)
RAM:4GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's impressive battery life is its most notable and attractive feature overall.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's display is underwhelming due to low pixel density and lack of color settings options.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's camera offers impressive performance, making it a compelling budget-friendly option overall.
The biggest takeaway is the phone's performance, offering solid CPU performance and average GPU results, with some notable drawbacks.
Ulefone
Ulefone Power Armor 13
Power Armor 13
Processor:MediaTek Helio G95
RAM:8GB
Storage:256GB

Quick Stats

The Ulefone Power Armor 13's battery life is its crowning jewel, offering unprecedented endurance and reliability.
The Power Armor 13's display is a standout feature, delivering vibrant colors and impressive brightness.
The Ulefone Power Armor 13's cameras are disappointing and fail to impress, even in good lighting conditions generally.
The Ulefone Power Armor 13 delivers exceptional performance, making it an excellent choice for demanding users every time.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Tie
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
2 GHz
Ulefone Power Armor 13
2 GHz

RAM

Winner
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
4GB
Ulefone Power Armor 13
8GB

Storage

Winner
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
128GB
Ulefone Power Armor 13
256GB

Weight

Winner
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
205g
Ulefone Power Armor 13
492g
Specifications Comparison
Specification
Samsung Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Ulefone Ulefone Power Armor 13
Model
MediaTek Dimensity 720 (MT6853V)
MediaTek Helio G95
CPU
2x Cortex, A76 2.0 GHz + 6x Cortex, A55 2.0 GHz
2x Cortex, A76 2.05 GHz + 6x Cortex, A55 1.95 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
7
12
Frequency
2
2
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
ARM Mali-G57
Arm Mali-G76 3EEMC4720 MHz
RAM
4
8
Type
N/A
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
128
256
Type
N/A
UFS Storage 2.1
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
N/A
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
N/A
Yes
Barometer sensor
N/A
Yes
Geomagnetic sensor
Yes
Yes
Audio
Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus
N/A
Antutu Score
249720
409878
Antutu Version
Antutu v8
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 59% of devices
Overall performance better than 70% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G

Strengths

The phone has a solid chipset that provides 5G connectivity
Excellent battery life lasting up to 123 hours
Decent camera experience with good quality photos and videos
Samsung's software support is top-notch

Weaknesses

Disappointing display with 720p resolution and standard refresh rate
Hollow and not very sturdy build quality
Slow charging speed taking around half an hour to charge from dead to just 23%

Ulefone Power Armor 13

Strengths

Powerful performance
Fast and snappy UI
Long battery life
Unique features
Good camera performance in good lighting
Wide compatibility

Weaknesses

Large and heavy design
Average camera performance in low light
Stabilization issues during video recording
Some fingerprint scanner quirks
Not a 5G device
Read Full Reviews

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G

The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G is a budget-friendly smartphone that offers a solid chipset with 5G connectivity, excellent battery life, and decent camera performance. However, it makes some compromises to balance out the cost. The phone's plastic build feels somewhat hollow, but not too light, weighing over 200 grams. The flat back has a reflective finish, while the rounded frame is chrome-colored. The biggest downgrade from the regular 4G version is the display, which features a 6.5-inch LCD with a 720p resolution and standard refresh rate. This results in a pixel density of 270 PPI, leading to some graininess and dull colors. The camera setup includes a 48MP quad Bayer main camera, an 8MP ultra-wide cam, a 5MP macro cam, and a depth sensor. While the photos are generally good for this class, with plenty of detail and sharp colors, there's some softness in low-light conditions and narrow dynamic range. The phone runs on One UI 3.1 based on Android 11, which offers three major OS updates and four years of security patches. The Mediatek Dimensity 720 5G chipset provides solid CPU performance for a mid-ranger and respectable GPU performance, but is not the best performer in its class. The battery life is excellent, with a great endurance rating of 123 hours in our test routine. However, charging speed is slow, with a 15W charger taking over half an hour to charge from dead to just 23%. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G is a decent budget phone that offers a solid chipset and good camera performance, but makes some compromises on the display and battery life. If you're set on getting a 5G Samsung on a budget and don't mind the lower-resolution LCD, this could be worth considering.

Ulefone Power Armor 13

The Ulefone Power Armor 13 is a behemoth of a phone, weighing in at an astonishing 492 grams, making it the largest and heaviest device I've ever had the pleasure of trying. While its size may be intimidating, this rugged phone packs a punch with its impressive feature set. Under the hood, you'll find the Mediatek Helio G95 processor paired with 8GB of RAM, delivering snappy performance that's more than capable of handling demanding tasks and games. The phone runs Android 11 out of the box, with a light launcher that feels remarkably close to stock Android. I was impressed by how fast it opens apps, switches between them, and even handles graphics-intensive games like Call of Duty. The display is another highlight, offering a larger screen than most rugged phones, making it perfect for those who need a device that can keep up with their active lifestyle. The battery life is equally impressive, providing days of use without needing to be plugged in. While the cameras are decent, they're not exactly setting any standards. In good light conditions, images are passable, but as soon as you venture into low-light situations, things start to degrade quickly. Video recording maxes out at 4K at 30fps, but lacks stabilization, resulting in shaky footage. The Ulefone Power Armor 13 is a solid choice for those seeking a rugged phone that can keep up with their active lifestyle. Its impressive battery life, larger screen, and robust feature set make it stand out from the competition. However, its massive size and weight may be a turn-off for some users, making it more suited to those who prioritize functionality over form. Overall, I'd say the Ulefone Power Armor 13 is a step up from other rugged phones on the market, but its size and weight may limit its appeal to some. If you're in the market for a reliable and feature-packed phone that can withstand the rigors of daily use, this device is definitely worth considering.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features