We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G is a budget-friendly smartphone that offers a solid chipset with 5G connectivity, excellent battery life, and decent camera performance. However, it makes some compromises to balance out the cost. The phone's plastic build feels somewhat hollow, but not too light, weighing over 200 grams. The flat back has a reflective finish, while the rounded frame is chrome-colored. The biggest downgrade from the regular 4G version is the display, which features a 6.5-inch LCD with a 720p resolution and standard refresh rate. This results in a pixel density of 270 PPI, leading to some graininess and dull colors. The camera setup includes a 48MP quad Bayer main camera, an 8MP ultra-wide cam, a 5MP macro cam, and a depth sensor. While the photos are generally good for this class, with plenty of detail and sharp colors, there's some softness in low-light conditions and narrow dynamic range. The phone runs on One UI 3.1 based on Android 11, which offers three major OS updates and four years of security patches. The Mediatek Dimensity 720 5G chipset provides solid CPU performance for a mid-ranger and respectable GPU performance, but is not the best performer in its class. The battery life is excellent, with a great endurance rating of 123 hours in our test routine. However, charging speed is slow, with a 15W charger taking over half an hour to charge from dead to just 23%. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G is a decent budget phone that offers a solid chipset and good camera performance, but makes some compromises on the display and battery life. If you're set on getting a 5G Samsung on a budget and don't mind the lower-resolution LCD, this could be worth considering.
The Xiaomi Redmi A3 is a budget-friendly smartphone that offers decent value for its price. The phone's design is modern with clean lines, but the camera bump may not appeal to everyone. The display is nice and the battery life is surprisingly good, lasting up to 3 days on a single charge. Performance-wise, the phone is suitable for casual users who only need it for basic tasks like calls, texts, browsing, and occasional social media use. It can handle some lighter games, but hardcore gaming enthusiasts may want to look elsewhere. The phone's RAM, storage, and processor are pretty basic, making it a no-frills champion. One of the notable improvements is the charging speed, which has been upgraded to 18W fast charging. This allows for faster charging times, making it convenient for users who prioritize battery life. Overall, the Redmi A3 is worth considering if you're on a tight budget and only need a phone for the essentials. However, it's not a powerhouse device that can handle demanding tasks or high-performance games. In summary, this phone gets the job done, but doesn't excel in any particular area. It earns a 6 out of 10 rating, making it a decent value play for those who don't need much from their smartphone.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features