Samsung Galaxy F05vsXiaomi Redmi A3

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Samsung
Samsung Galaxy F05
Galaxy F05
Processor:MediaTek Helio G85 (MT6769V/CZ)
RAM:4GB
Storage:64GB

Quick Stats

The Samsung Galaxy F05 boasts an impressive battery life, lasting up to two days with moderate use effortlessly.
The Samsung Galaxy F05's display is adequate but unremarkable, lacking a 90Hz refresh rate.
The camera on the Samsung Galaxy F05 delivers passable results, but lacks depth and detail in low-light conditions.
The Samsung Galaxy F05 delivers smooth, impressive performance without breaking the bank, making it a standout budget phone.
Xiaomi
Xiaomi Redmi A3
Redmi A3
Processor:Mediatek Helio G36
RAM:3GB
Storage:64GB

Quick Stats

The Xiaomi Redmi A3 boasts exceptional battery life, lasting three days or more with heavy use effortlessly.
The Xiaomi Redmi A3's display offers a reliable and enjoyable viewing experience for its price point effectively.
The Redmi A3's camera is a mixed bag, offering decent quality but poor low-light performance and autofocus issues.
The Xiaomi Redmi A3's performance is its most significant limitation for demanding use cases and gaming.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
Samsung Galaxy F05
2 GHz
Xiaomi Redmi A3
2.20 GHz

RAM

Winner
Samsung Galaxy F05
4GB
Xiaomi Redmi A3
3GB

Storage

Tie
Samsung Galaxy F05
64GB
Xiaomi Redmi A3
64GB

Weight

Winner
Samsung Galaxy F05
195g
Xiaomi Redmi A3
199g
Rank
Samsung Galaxy F05
Winner
#802
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#806
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
Samsung Galaxy F05
#741
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#747
Design
Samsung Galaxy F05
#831
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#835
Display
Samsung Galaxy F05
#854
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#689
Winner
Performance
Samsung Galaxy F05
#737
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#821
Battery
Samsung Galaxy F05
#704
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#798
Camera
Samsung Galaxy F05
#726
Winner
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#825
item_phones_categoryId
Samsung Galaxy F05
#1
Tie
Xiaomi Redmi A3
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
Samsung Samsung Galaxy F05
Xiaomi Xiaomi Redmi A3
Model
MediaTek Helio G85 (MT6769V/CZ)
Mediatek Helio G36
CPU
2x Cortex, A75 2.0 GHz + 6x Cortex, A55 1.8 GHz
8x Cortex, A53 2.2 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
12
12
Frequency
2
2.20
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Arm Mali-G52 MC2 950MHz
IMG PowerVR GE8320 680 MHz
RAM
4
3
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
64
64
Type
eMMC 5.1 Storage
eMMC 5.1 Storage
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, on the side
Fingerprint sensor
No
No
Proximity sensor
Yes
N/A
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Ultrasonic proximity virtual sensor
N/A
Yes
Audio
N/A
N/A
Antutu Score
225154
127000
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v9
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 57% of devices
Overall performance better than 51% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Samsung Galaxy F05

Strengths

Elegant and eco-friendly design with a silicone polymer back that mimics leather
Fourth generation Network support for smooth connectivity
Large battery with excellent endurance and fast charging capability (up to 25W)
Supports 1080p video recording at 30fps and good photo quality from the rear camera
Supports accelerometer, proximity sensors, and a traditional headphone jack
Good performance from the Mediatech Helio G85 processor for an entry-level phone

Weaknesses

Display could have been better with a 90Hz refresh rate like other phones in the same price range
Lack of fingerprint sensor, especially at this price point
No NFC support, which is not a major drawback but still a notable omission

Xiaomi Redmi A3

Strengths

No specific pros listed for this device

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

Read Full Reviews

Samsung Galaxy F05

The Samsung Galaxy F05 is a budget-friendly phone that offers decent specifications but also has some unexpected shortcomings. The phone's design is simple yet elegant, with a plastic body that may appeal to some users. However, it lacks a fingerprint sensor, which is a notable omission at this price point. The display features a 6.7-inch HD Plus screen with a resolution of 1,600 x 720 pixels, offering a pixel density of 262 pixels per inch. While the screen quality is fine for its price range, it would have been more impressive with a 90Hz refresh rate like some competitors in the same category. The phone is powered by the MediaTek Helio G85 processor, which provides excellent performance for daily usage such as browsing, gaming, and running apps moderately. The internal storage is limited to 64GB, but it supports expandable storage of up to 1TB via a dedicated memory card slot. The rear camera features a 50MP main sensor and a 2MP depth sensor for portrait shots, while the front camera has an 8MP resolution. The battery is a 5,000mAh unit that provides excellent endurance and supports 25W fast charging. The phone runs on Android 14 but lacks NFC support, which may not be a major drawback at this price point. However, the absence of a fingerprint sensor and the lack of stereo sound on the speakers are notable drawbacks. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy F05 is an entry-level phone that offers good performance and camera quality, but its limitations make it less competitive in its price category.

Xiaomi Redmi A3

The Xiaomi Redmi A3 is a budget-friendly smartphone that offers decent value for its price. The phone's design is modern with clean lines, but the camera bump may not appeal to everyone. The display is nice and the battery life is surprisingly good, lasting up to 3 days on a single charge. Performance-wise, the phone is suitable for casual users who only need it for basic tasks like calls, texts, browsing, and occasional social media use. It can handle some lighter games, but hardcore gaming enthusiasts may want to look elsewhere. The phone's RAM, storage, and processor are pretty basic, making it a no-frills champion. One of the notable improvements is the charging speed, which has been upgraded to 18W fast charging. This allows for faster charging times, making it convenient for users who prioritize battery life. Overall, the Redmi A3 is worth considering if you're on a tight budget and only need a phone for the essentials. However, it's not a powerhouse device that can handle demanding tasks or high-performance games. In summary, this phone gets the job done, but doesn't excel in any particular area. It earns a 6 out of 10 rating, making it a decent value play for those who don't need much from their smartphone.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features