We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
The Samsung Galaxy M13 5G has been launched in India with a price starting at Rs. 14,000, making it the most affordable 5G phone from the brand. While 5G is a significant advantage, other core areas also need to be strong to impress in this competitive segment. Design-wise, the M13 5G has a clean look, particularly from the rear, with two lenses sitting flush with the back of the handset. The midnight blue color with a basic matte finish is soothing but not exciting. The fit and finish are standard for a phone in this category, made entirely of plastic and weighing lightly. The display is a 6.5-inch HD+ LCD screen with a 90Hz refresh rate, making it smooth to use. However, the resolution becomes prominent while watching videos or playing games. The camera setup has only one functional rear camera, with the other module being a depth sensor, which is unfortunate given the increasing trend of ultra-wide cameras. Performance-wise, the M13 5G runs on Mediatek's Dimensity 700 SOC and comes with up to 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. It provides decent performance, interacting seamlessly with the UI. The phone can play demanding games without much throttling. Android 12 with One UI Core 4 is installed as the software. The camera performance was a letdown, struggling to maintain proper exposure in low light conditions. While the main camera produces nice results in daylight, it's not consistent, and the front camera has similar issues. Video quality is decent but lacks stabilization. Battery life, on the other hand, is impressive with up to seven hours of screen time on medium-heavy usage. Overall, while some areas fell short, the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G offers good performance and battery endurance for its price tag, making it a worthy consideration in this segment.
The Ulefone Power Armor 13 is a behemoth of a phone, weighing in at an astonishing 492 grams, making it the largest and heaviest device I've ever had the pleasure of trying. While its size may be intimidating, this rugged phone packs a punch with its impressive feature set. Under the hood, you'll find the Mediatek Helio G95 processor paired with 8GB of RAM, delivering snappy performance that's more than capable of handling demanding tasks and games. The phone runs Android 11 out of the box, with a light launcher that feels remarkably close to stock Android. I was impressed by how fast it opens apps, switches between them, and even handles graphics-intensive games like Call of Duty. The display is another highlight, offering a larger screen than most rugged phones, making it perfect for those who need a device that can keep up with their active lifestyle. The battery life is equally impressive, providing days of use without needing to be plugged in. While the cameras are decent, they're not exactly setting any standards. In good light conditions, images are passable, but as soon as you venture into low-light situations, things start to degrade quickly. Video recording maxes out at 4K at 30fps, but lacks stabilization, resulting in shaky footage. The Ulefone Power Armor 13 is a solid choice for those seeking a rugged phone that can keep up with their active lifestyle. Its impressive battery life, larger screen, and robust feature set make it stand out from the competition. However, its massive size and weight may be a turn-off for some users, making it more suited to those who prioritize functionality over form. Overall, I'd say the Ulefone Power Armor 13 is a step up from other rugged phones on the market, but its size and weight may limit its appeal to some. If you're in the market for a reliable and feature-packed phone that can withstand the rigors of daily use, this device is definitely worth considering.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features