We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
The Samsung Galaxy M32 is a decent mid-range smartphone that excels in everyday use. Its 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display with 90Hz refresh rate is a highlight, offering vibrant colors and smooth visuals. The One UI launcher experience is also commendable, although it may feel cluttered due to the abundance of pre-installed apps. The quad-camera setup on the back features a 64MP primary sensor that captures great photos in good lighting conditions. Details are preserved well, and colors appear natural. However, low-light performance is a letdown, with grainy or fuzzy images often resulting from the night mode. The ultra-wide-angle lens can introduce distortion and warmer colors. The front camera is decent, taking detailed selfies even in harsh light. Portrait mode works well, but nighttime photography is poor. Battery life is impressive, with a 5,000mAh battery that easily lasts a day of heavy use. Charging is fast via the Type-C port, although wireless charging is not available. One notable issue is the GPS functionality, which seemed to malfunction during testing. Overall, this is an average smartphone that should be considered for those seeking a reliable device for everyday use. In terms of performance, there's some slowdown and jankiness, particularly when using multiple apps simultaneously. However, for most users, this won't be a major concern. Compared to other mid-range options like the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, the Galaxy M32 is a solid choice, offering similar features at a competitive price. Overall, it's not a bad phone for the price, but it's not exceptional either. For casual users who want a reliable device without breaking the bank, the Samsung Galaxy M32 could be worth considering.
The Vivo Y21 is a budget-friendly smartphone designed to compete in the upper budget segment. Priced at KSh 16,999, this device boasts an affordable tag while packing some impressive features. Design-wise, the phone has a sleek diamond glow texture that's sure to turn heads. The well-positioned volume buttons and USB-C port are also notable features. Vivo opted for a side-mounted fingerprint sensor instead of an in-display one, which works efficiently. The 6.51-inch Halo LCD display with 1600x720 pixels resolution is not high-refresh-rate enabled, but it still provides a pleasant multimedia experience. The phone's performance is backed by a Mediatek Helio P35 processor paired with 4GB RAM and 64GB storage, expandable to 1GB. While the device handles light to medium tasks without any issues, gaming performance takes a hit. Playing graphic-intensive games like Call of Duty requires medium settings, which might deter some users. However, the phone's battery longevity is noteworthy. The 5000mAh battery delivers up to two days of use on a single charge, with charging speeds that top off from 0-70% in just 52 minutes using an 18W charger. The camera setup features three sensors - an 8MP selfie camera and a 13MP dual main camera with a 2MP macro sensor. While not the best camera performer, it's still a commendable feature set for its price bracket. Overall, the Vivo Y21 is a solid budget offering that's worth considering, especially given its excellent battery life, satisfactory performance, and value-for-money pricing.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features