Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4vsvivo v40E

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

Samsung
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
Galaxy Z Fold4
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen1
RAM:12GB
Storage:256GB

Quick Stats

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4's battery life is underwhelming, lasting around 10-11 hours with moderate usage.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4's display offers an unparalleled viewing experience with seamless transition between different modes.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4's camera system offers impressive improvements, especially in portrait mode and night mode capabilities overall.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4's performance is its standout feature, delivering exceptional results across various demanding activities seamlessly.
vivo
vivo v40E
v40E
Processor:MediaTek Dimensity 7300
RAM:8GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Vivo V40 boasts impressive battery life with a massive 5500mAh battery and rapid 80W charging capabilities easily.
The Vivo V40E's display is a solid effort with decent brightness and color accuracy, justifying its price point.
The Vivo V40E's camera delivers excellent results with great detail and minimal noise in various lighting conditions always.
The Vivo V40E delivers high-speed charging, fully charging its massive 5500mAh battery within 43 minutes.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
3.20 GHz
vivo v40E
2.50 GHz

RAM

Winner
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
12GB
vivo v40E
8GB

Storage

Winner
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
256GB
vivo v40E
128GB

Weight

Winner
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
271g
vivo v40E
183g
Specifications Comparison
Specification
Samsung Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
vivo vivo v40E
Model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen1
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
CPU
1x3.2 GHz Cortex, X2 +3x2.8 GHz Cortex, A710 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex, A510
4xCortex, A78 2.5GHz + 4xCortex, A55 2.0GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
4
4
Frequency
3.20
2.50
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Qualcomm Adreno 730 875 MHz
Arm Mali-G615 MC2
RAM
12
8
Type
RAM LPDDR5
N/A
Capacity
256
128
Type
UFS Storage 3.1
UFS Storage 2.2
SD slot
No
No
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
Yes, in screen
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Barometer sensor
Yes
N/A
Gravity sensor
Yes
N/A
Hall sensor
Yes
N/A
Geomagnetic sensor
Yes
N/A
Audio
Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers
Stereo Speakers
Antutu Score
1232800
708000
Antutu Version
Antutu v10
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 91% of devices
Overall performance better than 80% of devices
Cooling system
Yes
Yes
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

Strengths

No specific pros listed for this device

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

vivo v40E

Strengths

The Vivo V40E has a fast charging speed of 80w super fast charging, which can charge the phone from 0% to 100% in just 43 minutes.
The massive 5500 MH size battery provides ample power for heavy usage.
The phone's design is sleek and premium, with a glass back and plastic frame.
The dual cameras on the rear provide excellent image quality, especially with the 50 MP primary camera.
The phone has a high-quality display and features like fast charging, which is perfect for users who need their phone to be fully charged quickly.
The phone's battery health is 100% as per the settings

Weaknesses

There are no major cons mentioned in the review, but it would have been helpful if the reviewer had compared the phone with other similar devices in the market.
Read Full Reviews

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 boasts several upgrades over its predecessor, including a more powerful chipset and improved cameras. The phone's main camera features a 50-megapixel sensor with dual-pixel autofocus, while the telephoto zoom offers a 10-megapixel sensor with three times magnification. The ultra-wide-angle lens remains unchanged from the previous model. Image quality is generally good during the day, with pleasing results and plenty of detail. Portrait mode performs well, especially when using the main camera, which offers excellent subject separation. However, shadows can appear darker in night shots, but automatic night mode processing helps to improve this issue. Video recording capabilities are also enhanced, with the ability to capture 8K resolution footage at 24 frames per second. However, 4K video is a more practical and storage-efficient option, which delivers good detail and plenty of sharpening. Electronic stabilization is available in all resolutions and performs well, smoothing out camera shake. Other notable features include a wider cover screen, faster charging capabilities (up to 15W wirelessly), and the ability to reverse-charge other devices. The phone's price tag may be steep, but it remains one of the most cutting-edge foldable phones on the market, with no direct competitors in the global market. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 is a solid upgrade over its predecessor, offering improved cameras, faster charging, and a more powerful chipset. While not perfect, it's a worthwhile investment for those seeking the latest and greatest in foldable technology.

vivo v40E

The Vivo V40E is a mid-range smartphone that boasts an impressive 5500 mAh battery capacity and 80W super fast charging capabilities. In this test review, we put the phone's charging speed to the test. With a fully dead battery (1% charge), we connected the phone to its 80W charger and let it run for 15 minutes, after which it reached 46%. The charging speed was remarkably fast, considering the phone's size and capacity. At 25 minutes, the battery had reached 67%, and by 35 minutes, it had climbed to 87%. The phone continued to charge quickly, hitting 96% by the 40-minute mark. After a further three minutes, the battery finally hit 100%. The entire charging process took just 43 minutes, a testament to the power of Vivo's 80W super fast charging technology. In our test conditions (21°C room temperature), the phone's charging speed was impressive, and we would expect similar results in everyday use. While the battery size is substantial, the phone's overall design is still sleek, with a glass back and plastic frame, featuring dual cameras and a 50MP primary sensor. While this review focused solely on the battery charging test, it's clear that the Vivo V40E has plenty to offer, including its speedy charging capabilities. If you're in the market for a mid-range smartphone with impressive specs, the Vivo V40E is definitely worth considering.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features