We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 boasts several upgrades over its predecessor, including a more powerful chipset and improved cameras. The phone's main camera features a 50-megapixel sensor with dual-pixel autofocus, while the telephoto zoom offers a 10-megapixel sensor with three times magnification. The ultra-wide-angle lens remains unchanged from the previous model. Image quality is generally good during the day, with pleasing results and plenty of detail. Portrait mode performs well, especially when using the main camera, which offers excellent subject separation. However, shadows can appear darker in night shots, but automatic night mode processing helps to improve this issue. Video recording capabilities are also enhanced, with the ability to capture 8K resolution footage at 24 frames per second. However, 4K video is a more practical and storage-efficient option, which delivers good detail and plenty of sharpening. Electronic stabilization is available in all resolutions and performs well, smoothing out camera shake. Other notable features include a wider cover screen, faster charging capabilities (up to 15W wirelessly), and the ability to reverse-charge other devices. The phone's price tag may be steep, but it remains one of the most cutting-edge foldable phones on the market, with no direct competitors in the global market. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 is a solid upgrade over its predecessor, offering improved cameras, faster charging, and a more powerful chipset. While not perfect, it's a worthwhile investment for those seeking the latest and greatest in foldable technology.
I recently had the opportunity to try out the Xiaomi Redmi K50, and unfortunately, my experience was underwhelming. Despite its impressive specs on paper, this phone failed to deliver in several key areas. The camera performance was abysmal, especially in low-light conditions. The sensor size is decent, but it seems that the software is not optimized to extract the best from it. Daytime photos are okay, but nowhere near as good as what I've seen on other phones with similar cameras. The gaming experience was actually quite enjoyable, thanks to the phone's powerful processor and snappy performance. However, only a few games, like Asphalt 9, have adapted to take full advantage of the phone's high refresh rate capabilities. Battery life is decent for general use, but drops significantly when gaming or using resource-intensive apps. The display is nice, and the speakers are quite good, making it enjoyable to watch videos or listen to music on this phone. My biggest disappointment lies in the camera performance, which I believe is a software issue rather than a hardware one. For a phone priced around $500-$600, there are better options available that offer superior camera capabilities. If you're a gamer and don't mind a mediocre camera experience, then the Redmi K50 might be worth considering. However, if you prioritize taking good photos or have high expectations for your camera, I would suggest looking elsewhere. There are simply better phones on the market that offer more value for the price.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features