vivo S16evsSamsung Galaxy F34 5G

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

vivo
vivo S16e
S16e
Processor:Samsung Exynos 1080
RAM:8GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Vivo S16e's battery life is decent but underwhelming, requiring frequent top-ups for heavy users.
The Vivo S16e's display boasts a stunning HDR10+ AMOLED screen with impressive 120Hz refresh rate and high peak brightness.
The Vivo S16e's camera setup offers impressive results with high-quality image resolution and advanced features.
The Vivo S16e's strongest selling point is its impressive performance, making it a reliable mid-range smartphone choice overall.
Samsung
Samsung Galaxy F34 5G
Galaxy F34 5G
Processor:Samsung Exynos 1280
RAM:6GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The standout feature of the Samsung Galaxy F34 5G is its exceptional battery life with impressive endurance.
The Samsung Galaxy F34 5G's impressive AMOLED display offers vibrant and accurate colors with excellent brightness and energy efficiency.
The Samsung Galaxy F34 5G's solid camera setup delivers impressive results across various lighting conditions seamlessly.
The Samsung Galaxy F34 5G offers a solid performance experience suitable for casual users and everyday tasks.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
vivo S16e
2.80 GHz
Samsung Galaxy F34 5G
2.40 GHz

RAM

Winner
vivo S16e
8GB
Samsung Galaxy F34 5G
6GB

Storage

Tie
vivo S16e
128GB
Samsung Galaxy F34 5G
128GB

Weight

Winner
vivo S16e
187g
Samsung Galaxy F34 5G
208g
Rank
vivo S16e
Winner
#340
Samsung Galaxy F34 5G
#522
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
vivo S16e
#234
Winner
Samsung Galaxy F34 5G
#445
Design
vivo S16e
#476
Winner
Samsung Galaxy F34 5G
#725
Display
vivo S16e
#177
Winner
Samsung Galaxy F34 5G
#212
Performance
vivo S16e
#339
Winner
Samsung Galaxy F34 5G
#551
Battery
vivo S16e
#329
Winner
Samsung Galaxy F34 5G
#523
Camera
vivo S16e
#517
Winner
Samsung Galaxy F34 5G
#650
item_phones_categoryId
vivo S16e
#1
Tie
Samsung Galaxy F34 5G
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
vivo vivo S16e
Samsung Samsung Galaxy F34 5G
Model
Samsung Exynos 1080
Samsung Exynos 1280
CPU
1x Cortex, A78 2.8 GHz + 3x Cortex, A78 2.6 GHz + 4x Cortex, A55 2.0 GHz
2x Cortex, A78 2.4 GHz + 6x Cortex, A55 2.0 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
5
5
Frequency
2.80
2.40
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Mali G78 MP10
Mali-G68 MC4 4x cores 1GHz
RAM
8
6
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
128
128
Type
UFS Storage 3.1
N/A
SD slot
No
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, in screen
Yes, in screen
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
N/A
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Gravity sensor
Yes
N/A
Hall sensor
N/A
Yes
Geomagnetic sensor
N/A
Yes
Ultrasonic proximity virtual sensor
N/A
Yes
Audio
N/A
N/A
Antutu Score
720000
475448
Antutu Version
Antutu v9
Antutu v10
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 80% of devices
Overall performance better than 74% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

vivo S16e

Strengths

Vivo S16e has an attractive design with under-display fingerprint sensor, USB type-c port, and a bumpy camera module that gives it a premium look.
The phone's screen to body ratio is high at 85.9% making it a great device for media consumption.
It comes with a 6.62 inch HDR 10 plus amole display and a refresh rate of 120 hertz, which makes content easy to view even in bright sunlight.
The phone's build quality is much better, with protection from gorilla glass on the front, a glass back, and an aluminum frame.
It supports fast charging of up to 66 watts, which can charge the phone from 0 to 50% in just 19 minutes.
The device has a good camera setup, with a 50 megapixel main sensor, macro, and depth sensors, making it suitable for photography enthusiasts.

Weaknesses

The phone's benchmark score is lower than its predecessor, the S15e, which might be a concern for gaming enthusiasts.
It lacks stereo speakers and a headphone jack, which can affect sound quality.
The camera of Vivo S16e cannot record video at high frame rates like some other flagship devices, being limited to 24 FPS.
Vivo S16e has not more good feature according to its price, making it a less desirable option in the mid-range segment.
It does not come with a recent Android OS version, having only Android 11 out of the box and not receiving any official updates yet.
The phone's battery life is sufficient for daily use but gaming might require more frequent charging.

Samsung Galaxy F34 5G

Strengths

It has a bright AMOLED display
The battery is quite massive and will last for a long time, even with heavy usage
You can make 4K 30fps videos with this phone, which is impressive at its price point
The OIS works very well and there's no lag in video recording
You get excellent quality audio when listening to music through headphones, and Dolby Atmos support too
The single speaker is loud, although it would be even better with dual speakers

Weaknesses

It may not be the best choice for gamers due to its performance issues compared to other phones in the same price range
There's a durability concern with the Realme 9 SE, but it's also available with a similar spec and price point
The CPU is slightly weak, which may impact performance
The display isn't as great as some other phones, like OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite
You have to buy this phone online only from Flipkart or Samsung's website
There's no charger included in the box, so you'll need to arrange one yourself
Read Full Reviews

vivo S16e

The Vivo S16e is a mid-range smartphone launched by Vivo on September 12, 2022. This phone comes in three variants, each with its own set of specifications. The design of the phone is attractive and features an under-display fingerprint sensor, a USB Type-C port, dual SIM tray, and a microphone on top. The phone has a 6.62-inch HDR10+ AMOLED display with a higher refresh rate of 120Hz, making it suitable for gaming and multimedia consumption. The screen resolution is 1080 x 2400 pixels, and the density is 398 PPI. The phone runs on Android 11 OS but has been upgraded to Android 13. The Vivo S16e is powered by an Exynos 1085 chipset, which provides fast speeds for gaming and connectivity. However, its Benchmark score of 6,75,944 is lower than that of the previous model, the S15e. The phone features a triple-camera setup with a 50MP main sensor, a 2MP macro camera, and a 2MP depth sensor. The phone comes in three variants: 8GB + 128GB, 8GB + 256GB, and 12GB + 256GB, each with UFS 3.1 storage. The phone has a non-removable battery of 4600mAh and supports fast charging at 66W. The Vivo S16e is available in three colors: Black Sea Green, Purple, and starts at a price of $280 for the base variant. Overall, the phone has average features considering its price. If you're looking for a mid-range phone with decent specifications, the S16e might be worth considering. However, it's not significantly better than other options in the market. 3/5 For those who want a budget-friendly phone with average features and don't need top-of-the-line specs.

Samsung Galaxy F34 5G

The Samsung Galaxy F34 5G is an intriguing smartphone that checks many boxes for casual users. Its AMOLED display shines bright, while its massive 6000mAh battery promises extended usage times. The camera setup delivers quality images and videos, with 4K recording capabilities. However, the phone's performance may falter when pushed to its limits, such as during gaming. This review will delve into the pros and cons of this device, helping potential buyers decide whether it suits their needs or not.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Read vivo S16e ReviewRead Samsung Galaxy F34 5G Review

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features