vivo T1vsrealme C30

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

vivo
vivo T1
T1
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (SM6375)
RAM:8GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The vivo T1 boasts an impressive 5000mAh battery with up to eight hours of screen-on time available.
The Vivo T1's display offers a smooth experience with a 120Hz refresh rate but lacks overall quality and features.
The Vivo T1's camera department is its strong suit, offering great performance for a mid-range smartphone overall.
The Vivo T1's performance is solid but not spectacular, delivering decent results for everyday tasks and gaming.
realme
realme C30
C30
Processor:Unisoc Tiger T612
RAM:3GB
Storage:32GB

Quick Stats

The Realme C30's battery life is more than adequate for a budget smartphone, lasting at least two days.
The Realme C30's display is a pleasant surprise, offering crisp and clear visuals at its budget-friendly price point always.
The Realme C30's camera performance is decent for everyday use, but lacks advanced features and image quality overall.
The Realme C30 delivers smooth performance, handling everyday tasks with ease and offering efficient battery life capabilities.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
vivo T1
2.20 GHz
realme C30
1.80 GHz

RAM

Winner
vivo T1
8GB
realme C30
3GB

Storage

Winner
vivo T1
128GB
realme C30
32GB

Weight

Winner
vivo T1
192g
realme C30
182g
Rank
vivo T1
Winner
#501
realme C30
#842
Scores by Category
Rankings
Connectivity
vivo T1
#363
Winner
realme C30
#845
Design
vivo T1
#689
Winner
realme C30
#837
Display
vivo T1
#494
Winner
realme C30
#831
Performance
vivo T1
#516
Winner
realme C30
#774
Battery
vivo T1
#345
Winner
realme C30
#808
Camera
vivo T1
#366
Winner
realme C30
#859
item_phones_categoryId
vivo T1
#1
Tie
realme C30
#1
Tie

Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.

Specifications Comparison
Specification
vivo vivo T1
realme realme C30
Model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (SM6375)
Unisoc Tiger T612
CPU
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold +6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
2 x ARM Cortex, A75 1.8Ghz + 6 x ARM Cortex, A55 1.8Ghz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
6
12
Frequency
2.20
1.80
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Mali-G57 MP1
RAM
8
3
Type
RAM LPDDR5
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
128
32
Type
UFS Storage 3.1
UFS Storage 2.2
SD slot
No
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, on the side
No
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
No
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
Yes
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Geomagnetic sensor
N/A
Yes
Audio
Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphones
N/A
Antutu Score
405854
224223
Antutu Version
Antutu v9
Antutu v9
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 69% of devices
Overall performance better than 57% of devices
Cooling system
Yes
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

vivo T1

Strengths

No specific pros listed for this device

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

realme C30

Strengths

For its price, it packs quite a lot, including the Unisoc T612 chipset, huge 6.5-inch display, dual sim support, etc.
The 6.5 inch LCD display is excellent for a sub-10k phone, with clear text and vivid colors
The phone's performance is smooth, with no lag, even when running demanding apps like Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp, Netflix, YouTube
It has a decent single-camera setup that can be used in well-lit situations

Weaknesses

Lacks a fingerprint scanner for biometric authentication
Has a micro-USB port instead of USB-C, which might not be convenient for some users
The phone's camera performance is basic and may struggle in low-light conditions
Battery takes around 3-4 hours to fully charge with the provided 10W charger
Read Full Reviews

vivo T1

The Vivo T1 is a mid-range smartphone that boasts a fairly capable chipset, a 120Hz display, and a 50MP primary camera lens. However, the phone falls short in various aspects. The display, although fast at 120Hz, is not fully optimized for seamless performance. Additionally, the camera setup lacks an ultra-wide-angle sensor and features only two gimmicky lenses for depth and macro shots. The primary camera performs well under good lighting conditions, producing natural color tones with decent dynamic range. However, low-light images suffer from a lack of detail and excessive light flares. The selfie camera takes decent photos but struggles to maintain exposure in the background. Video recording capabilities are limited to 1080p at 60fps without stabilization. The phone's battery life is commendable, lasting around seven to eight hours on moderate usage, despite the slim form factor. However, the charging speed of 18W feels sluggish, taking over two hours to fully juice up the 5000mAh battery. In terms of software, the Vivo T1 runs on Funtouch OS 12 based on Android 12, offering features like a privacy dashboard and camera/microphone indicator. However, there's no official word on the number of android updates it will receive. Considering its price point, the phone is not the best value for money. The Realme 9 Pro and Galaxy F23 offer better performance at similar prices. If you're set on getting the Vivo T1, consider looking into the iQoo Z6 instead, which offers a similar experience at a lower cost.

realme C30

The Realme C30 is back with its budget-friendly charm. Priced between ₹8,000-₹10,000, this phone packs quite a punch. With the Unisoc T612 chipset and a 6.5-inch display, it's an attractive option for those seeking a no-frills smartphone experience. The design is slim, battery life promises two days of use, and the camera setup is adequate for casual snappers. But how well does it perform in real-world scenarios? This review delves into the details to find out if the Realme C30 is worth your consideration.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features