vivo V21vsMotorola Moto G60

We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.

vivo
vivo V21
V21
Processor:MediaTek Dimensity 800U (MT6853)
RAM:8GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Vivo V21 5G boasts exceptional battery life with over 123 hours of usage time, making it standout feature.
The Vivo V21 5G's impressive AMOLED display with 90Hz refresh rate is its standout feature overall.
The Vivo V21's camera is an unexpected strength, delivering decent to excellent results across various scenarios.
The Vivo V21 5G's performance is adequate for its price range, not exceptional or standout.
Motorola
Motorola Moto G60
Moto G60
Processor:Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
RAM:6GB
Storage:128GB

Quick Stats

The Motorola Moto G60 boasts exceptional battery life, lasting 12-14 hours with moderate to heavy use easily.
The Motorola Moto G60's impressive display offers vibrant colors, high brightness, and smooth visuals at an affordable price point.
The Motorola Moto G60 boasts a top-notch camera package, rivaling flagships in the mid-range market.
The Motorola Moto G60 delivers impressive performance for its price point, making it ideal for gaming and everyday use.
Key Differences

Processor Speed

Winner
vivo V21
2.40 GHz
Motorola Moto G60
2.30 GHz

RAM

Winner
vivo V21
8GB
Motorola Moto G60
6GB

Storage

Tie
vivo V21
128GB
Motorola Moto G60
128GB

Weight

Winner
vivo V21
176g
Motorola Moto G60
225g
Specifications Comparison
Specification
vivo vivo V21
Motorola Motorola Moto G60
Model
MediaTek Dimensity 800U (MT6853)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
CPU
2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex, A76 +6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex, A55
2x Kryo 470 2.3 GHz + 6x Kryo 470 1.8 GHz
Type
Octa-Core
Octa-Core
Nanometer
7
8
Frequency
2.40
2.30
64 Bits
Yes
Yes
GPU
ARM Mali-G57 MC3
Qualcomm Adreno 618
RAM
8
6
Type
LPDDR4X RAM
LPDDR4X RAM
Capacity
128
128
Type
UFS Storage 2.2
N/A
Fingerprint security
Yes, in screen
Yes, in the back
Fingerprint sensor
Yes
Yes
Proximity sensor
Yes
Yes
Light sensor
Yes
Yes
Accelerometer sensor
Yes
Yes
Compass sensor
Yes
N/A
Gyroscope sensor
Yes
Yes
Hall sensor
N/A
Yes
Audio
N/A
2 microphones
Antutu Score
343150
301500
Antutu Version
Antutu v8
Antutu v8
Antutu Standing
Overall performance better than 65% of devices
Overall performance better than 62% of devices
Cooling system
No
No
Gaming buttons
No
No
Extras
N/A
N/A

Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.

Pros and Cons

vivo V21

Strengths

The screen has a 90hz refresh rate, which is an entry-level high refresh rate that provides a much smoother experience.
The battery life is excellent, with 123 hours of endurance in our tests.
The selfie camera performance is unmatched in its price segment, producing 40 megapixel stills with autofocus and OIS.
The phone's screen has HDR 10+ support and widevine L1 certification, making it suitable for streaming high-quality videos.

Weaknesses

No specific cons listed for this device

Motorola Moto G60

Strengths

One of the most interesting mid-range phones of the year 2021
Huge 6000 milliamp hour battery inside with 20 watt charging
108 megapixel back camera and a 32 megapixel front camera that films in 4k
120 hertz refresh rate display for smooth performance
6 gigs of RAM, 120 gigabytes of storage, and micro SD card slot for expansion
Stock Android 11 with promise of quick software updates
Priced at around $300 or so, making it one of the best bang for the buck phones

Weaknesses

Only 4g connectivity, no love for 5g
Basic camera package with no stereo speakers
No FM radio in some regions (mentioned but not confirmed)
No stereo speakers and only a single speaker at the bottom
Weight is 225 grams, making it feel beefy despite decent distribution
Display panel is an IPS LCD without any special features besides HDR10
No fast charging support for micro SD card slot
Read Full Reviews

vivo V21

The Vivo V21 5G stands out in the market with its exceptional selfie video capabilities, making it a top choice for social media enthusiasts and those who frequently engage in long video calls. While other mid-range smartphones may have more powerful chipsets, the Vivo V21 5G excels in power efficiency, ensuring smooth day-to-day performance. The phone's design is sleek and premium, with a plastic build that feels solid to the touch. The 6.4-inch AMOLED display offers a high refresh rate of 90Hz, providing a seamless viewing experience. The camera setup includes a 64MP primary sensor, an 8MP ultrawide lens, and a 2MP macro camera, which delivers impressive results in various lighting conditions. The highlight of the phone is undoubtedly its 44MP selfie camera, which produces stunning stills and videos with excellent autofocus, LED flash, and OIS. The front-facing camera captures detailed selfies, even in low light, making it ideal for social media content creation. While the Vivo V21 5G may not be the most powerful mid-ranger on the market, its focus on power efficiency makes it a reliable choice for everyday tasks. The phone's battery life is also commendable, lasting up to 123 hours on our tests. In comparison to other mid-range smartphones like the Redmi Note 10 and Galaxy A52 5G, the Vivo V21 5G may not have all the bells and whistles, but it excels in its niche. If top-notch selfie video capabilities are a priority, this phone is definitely worth considering, especially given its competitive pricing.

Motorola Moto G60

The Motorola Moto G60 is an intriguing mid-range smartphone that checks many boxes on the feature list. Priced around $300, this device boasts a massive 6,000mAh battery, 108MP back camera, and 4K-capable front camera with LED flash. Other notable specs include a high-refresh-rate display (120Hz), 8nm Qualcomm processor, and 4GB RAM. This phone offers impressive value for its price, making it a strong contender in the budget-friendly market.

Need help choosing?

Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.

Compare other phones

Explore comparisons between any other phones

Compare phones
VS

Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features