We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
The Vivo V25e is a solid device that checks most of the right boxes for its price. It boasts a sleek design with a flat profile, glass on both display and rear, and a nice matte textured finish on the rear glass. The phone also features a triple camera setup with dual rings, a single bottom-firing mono speaker, and a 6.4-inch 1080p AMOLED display with a U-style notch. The Vivo V25e's display is vibrant and gets really bright up to 1300 nits, making it suitable for everyday use. The phone also features a fingerprint scanner on the display, which has been responsive and accurate most of the time. Software-wise, the device runs on Android 12 and Funtouch OS 12, with some nice customizations. The Mediatek Helio G99 processor powers this device, offering better battery optimization and higher CPU frequency compared to its predecessor. The phone also features 8GB of RAM, which can be extended by an additional 8GB via RAM Plus. While the V25e doesn't support 5G, it's a decent option for gaming, with smooth performance in high-graphics titles. The camera department has seen an upgrade, particularly on the main camera with the addition of OIS to its 64MP camera. However, there's no ultra-wide camera, and instead, we get a 2MP macro and depth sensor. The selfie camera is 32MP, taking good photos but sometimes requiring multiple shots due to overexposure. Overall, the Vivo V25e offers great value for its price, with impressive benchmark scores and decent gaming performance. While it may not be perfect, the phone's solid build quality, good display, and camera capabilities make it a strong contender in the mid-range market.
The Xiaomi Redmi 14C is a budget smartphone that can be purchased for €150, making it one of the most affordable options in its class. This device boasts a sleek design, with a vegan leather backside and polished plastic frame, giving it a premium look. The phone features a 6.88-inch LCD display with a 120Hz refresh rate, which can be trimmed down to 60Hz for longer battery life. The Redmi 14C comes equipped with a large 5,160mAh battery that lasts up to 20 hours of continuous video streaming. However, the charging speed is relatively slow at 18W, and there's no wireless or reverse wireless charging available. In terms of features, the phone runs on MIUI based on Android 14, with a fingerprint sensor and face detection for biometric authentication. It also supports gestures like turning off and on by double-tapping the screen and launching the camera by double-pressing the side button. The Redmi 14C's performance is somewhat disappointing, with laggy scrolling and delays when opening apps or gaming. The phone runs on a Mediatech Helio G81 Ultra processor, which doesn't quite live up to expectations. The camera department features a 50-megapixel primary sensor without optical image stabilization (OIS), making it difficult to take steady shots. The front-facing camera is a 13-megapixel snapper that can shoot videos in 1080p at 30fps, but lacks an ultra-wide-angle lens and has limited zoom capabilities. Overall, the Xiaomi Redmi 14C offers decent value for its price, but falls short in terms of performance and camera quality compared to other smartphones in the same segment.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features