We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
The Vivo X Fold3 Pro is a significant player in the foldable phone market, with impressive build quality and sleek design. Weighing just 236g, this device outshines its competitors in terms of weight distribution and pocket-friendliness. The aluminum body and carbon fiber hinge work seamlessly together to provide a premium feel. The X Fold3 Pro boasts two impressive AMOLED displays, with the inner 8.3-inch screen featuring a 2K+ resolution and supporting 120Hz refresh rates. Both screens are HDR10+, support high refresh rates, and have in-display fingerprint scanners - a first for foldables. The device is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, with 16GB RAM and 512GB storage. In our testing, we found no lag or stuttering even during heavy multitasking and gaming. Real-world multitasking was where this device excelled, allowing seamless transitions between smartphone and mini-tablet form factors. Gaming performance was also impressive, handling graphically intensive games with ease. The ZBED camera system is versatile, featuring a 50MP main sensor, OIS, 64MP telephoto lens, and 50MP ultra-wide camera. Low-light performance was commendable, with night mode delivering brightened scenes without excessive noise. Battery life was also impressive, lasting two full days with moderate use. The phone supports 100W fast charging and 50W wireless charging. While the Vivo X Fold3 Pro is a compelling package that pushes the boundaries of foldable technology, its high price tag ( ₹1H 160,000) may deter some potential buyers.
Despite its impressive specs on paper, the Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro failed to deliver in various aspects. The phone's camera was a major letdown, struggling with low-light photography and often overexposing images. Even using a GCAM port didn't improve the results significantly. Daytime photos were excellent, but that's not enough to redeem the camera's shortcomings. The 100-megapixel sensor, touted as a highlight of the phone, seemed to be hampered by software issues rather than hardware limitations. The battery life was average, with around 7-8 hours of screen time in everyday use. However, gaming performance was excellent, with smooth gameplay and long battery life (4-5 hours). The speakers were also impressive, making this a great phone for gaming enthusiasts. However, the camera's poor performance makes it hard to recommend this phone, especially when considering its high price point. For the same money, you can get better cameras on older Xiaomi phones or even last year's OnePlus 9 Pro. If your primary concern is gaming, then the Redmi K50 Pro might be a good choice. The display, battery life, and speakers all performed well in this regard. However, if photography is important to you, there are far better options available, making this phone a hard sell overall.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features