We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Metric | vivo X90 | Xiaomi Redmi K50 |
---|---|---|
Connectivity | #238 Winner | #277 |
Design | #677 Winner | #709 |
Display | #245 | #89 Winner |
Performance | #101 Winner | #306 |
Battery | #332 | #147 Winner |
Camera | #363 Winner | #519 |
item_phones_categoryId | #1 Tie | #1 Tie |
Note: Lower rank number indicates a better position in category.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific cons listed for this device
The Vivo X90 is the standard variant of Vivo's flagship lineup, boasting impressive upgrades over its predecessor. Despite shipping attention towards Xiaomi's Digital Series, Vivo has successfully created an efficient smartphone with the X90. With a 6.78-inch Boe Q9 display, the X90 offers a 1260p resolution and 1300 nits peak brightness, providing a comfortable visual experience in low light conditions. The phone also features a new Zs T coating for its triple lenses, which enhances photo and video quality in extreme low light conditions. Under the hood, the X90 is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9200 chipset, delivering impressive performance in benchmarks. In Geekbench 5, the X90 achieves a 15% boost in single-core performance, while in 3D Mark GPU tests, it surpasses an iPhone 14 Pro's A16 chip. The camera performance is surprisingly decent, with the same triple lenses as its predecessor, but the new Zs T coating and V2 image chip deliver enhanced photos and videos. The battery life is also satisfactory, with a 4800mAh capacity and 120W fast charging capabilities. While not without its drawbacks, the Vivo X90 is poised to become one of the best flagship killers of 2023, with its impressive performance, camera capabilities, and feature-packed design making it a compelling choice for Android enthusiasts.
I recently had the opportunity to try out the Xiaomi Redmi K50, and unfortunately, my experience was underwhelming. Despite its impressive specs on paper, this phone failed to deliver in several key areas. The camera performance was abysmal, especially in low-light conditions. The sensor size is decent, but it seems that the software is not optimized to extract the best from it. Daytime photos are okay, but nowhere near as good as what I've seen on other phones with similar cameras. The gaming experience was actually quite enjoyable, thanks to the phone's powerful processor and snappy performance. However, only a few games, like Asphalt 9, have adapted to take full advantage of the phone's high refresh rate capabilities. Battery life is decent for general use, but drops significantly when gaming or using resource-intensive apps. The display is nice, and the speakers are quite good, making it enjoyable to watch videos or listen to music on this phone. My biggest disappointment lies in the camera performance, which I believe is a software issue rather than a hardware one. For a phone priced around $500-$600, there are better options available that offer superior camera capabilities. If you're a gamer and don't mind a mediocre camera experience, then the Redmi K50 might be worth considering. However, if you prioritize taking good photos or have high expectations for your camera, I would suggest looking elsewhere. There are simply better phones on the market that offer more value for the price.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features