We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
The Vivo Y18 boasts a sleek and stylish design with a glossy plastic back that looks premium but can be prone to fingerprint smudges. The rounded edges provide comfort in the hand, while the 6.5-inch HD+ IPS LCD display offers vibrant colors and decent viewing angles. Under the hood, the phone runs on FunTouch OS 12 based on Android 12, with a MediaTek Helio P35 processor paired with 4GB of RAM. While this setup is suitable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media, it may struggle with heavy gaming or multitasking. The dual-camera setup features a 13MP main sensor and a 2MP depth sensor, delivering good results in well-lit conditions but compromising on low-light performance. The front camera is an 8MP sensor suitable for selfies and video calls. Battery life is one of the Y18's strengths, with a 5,000mAh battery that can easily last a full day with moderate use. Additional features include facial recognition, a fingerprint sensor, and dual-SIM support. Sleek design, good battery life, decent performance for everyday tasks, expandable storage. Display is only HD+, camera performance could be better in low light, not ideal for heavy gaming or photography. Overall, the Vivo Y18 is a solid choice for those seeking a budget-friendly phone with a nice design and good battery life. However, users requiring a device for heavy gaming or photography may want to consider alternative options.
The Xiaomi Redmi A3 is a budget-friendly smartphone that offers decent value for its price. The phone's design is modern with clean lines, but the camera bump may not appeal to everyone. The display is nice and the battery life is surprisingly good, lasting up to 3 days on a single charge. Performance-wise, the phone is suitable for casual users who only need it for basic tasks like calls, texts, browsing, and occasional social media use. It can handle some lighter games, but hardcore gaming enthusiasts may want to look elsewhere. The phone's RAM, storage, and processor are pretty basic, making it a no-frills champion. One of the notable improvements is the charging speed, which has been upgraded to 18W fast charging. This allows for faster charging times, making it convenient for users who prioritize battery life. Overall, the Redmi A3 is worth considering if you're on a tight budget and only need a phone for the essentials. However, it's not a powerhouse device that can handle demanding tasks or high-performance games. In summary, this phone gets the job done, but doesn't excel in any particular area. It earns a 6 out of 10 rating, making it a decent value play for those who don't need much from their smartphone.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features