We compare these two popular phones to help you decide which one fits your needs and budget better.
Note: Highlighted specifications show differences between the two devices.
No specific pros listed for this device
No specific cons listed for this device
In an era where smartphones are becoming increasingly premium, the $150 price range has lost some of its former glory. However, there's still a significant demand for budget-friendly options that offer solid performance and practical features. The Vivo Y37 Pro, part of Vivo's Y series, targets this segment with a well-balanced combination of design, durability, and functionality. The phone's elegant design belies its affordable price, featuring a clean and minimalistic flat body with rounded corners and smooth transitions. The back cover boasts an advanced coating technology that creates a visually stunning effect, resembling a sea of flowers. Weighing in at 199g and measuring 8.09mm in thickness, the phone is both comfortable to hold and easy to carry. The Vivo Y37 Pro sports a 6.68-inch LCD panel with a high refresh rate of up to 120Hz, ensuring smooth scrolling and a responsive touch experience. The screen's brightness reaches up to 7237 nits, making it easily readable under direct sunlight. The phone is also equipped with a large 6000mAh battery that offers exceptional longevity, lasting through a full day of heavy use. The Vivo Y37 Pro features a 50MP primary camera on the back and a 5MP front camera, delivering decent results in well-lit conditions. The phone's AI-driven photo processing capabilities are particularly noteworthy, allowing users to remove unwanted objects from their photos with ease. With fast charging support and respectable speeds, the battery life is more than sufficient for most users. The Vivo Y37 Pro is a testament to the fact that budget smartphones can still offer a well-rounded experience. With its durable design, impressive battery life, and sufficient performance for everyday tasks, it remains a strong contender in the $150 price range. For those who prioritize practicality and value over the latest tech features, the Vivo Y37 Pro is an excellent choice that won't disappoint.
The Samsung Galaxy A52S 5G is a mid-range smartphone that boasts a sleek design with a soft matte finish in various colors. The device's build quality is impressive, featuring IP67-rated dust and water resistance, a rarity in this price segment. The most significant upgrade over the regular A52 5G is the new Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G chipset, which provides improved performance and graphics capabilities. In our testing, the A52S 5G delivered great CPU performance, comparable to flagship-grade phones like the Poco X3 Pro. Graphics performance was respectable for its price range, making it a better choice for gaming enthusiasts. The device's battery life is also solid, with a nearly identical endurance rating of 113 hours as the regular model. The camera setup remains unchanged from the A52 5G, featuring a quad-camera setup with a 64MP primary sensor, 12MP ultra-wide-angle lens, and a 32MP front-facing camera. Image quality was decent during the day, with accurate colors and dynamic range, while nighttime shots showed some improvement. The ultrawide camera performed reasonably well at night. Other features on the A52S 5G include a 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, an under-display fingerprint reader, stereo speakers, and a headphone jack. Storage options are expandable through microSD, and the device runs on Samsung's OneUI 3.1 based on Android 11. In conclusion, the Samsung Galaxy A52S 5G offers improved performance, graphics capabilities, and battery life over its predecessor, all at the same price point. With no sacrifices in features or pricing, this device is worth recommending over the older model for anyone seeking a solid mid-range smartphone experience.
Read our detailed reviews to understand which device is better for your specific needs and budget.
Explore comparisons between any other phones
Choose two different items to see a detailed comparison of their specifications, performance, and features